| Literature DB >> 34276370 |
Maaz Ahmed Khan1, Varsha Srivastava1, Mariya Kabir1, Monalisha Samal1, Areeba Insaf1, Mohammad Ibrahim1, Sultan Zahiruddin1, Sayeed Ahmad1.
Abstract
The present study is aimed at developing a synergistic combination to enhance learning and memory in Alzheimer's patients with the help of eight common medicinal plants used in the AYUSH system. Aqueous and hydroalcoholic extracts of eight medicinal plants from the AYUSH system of medicine were prepared. These were subjected to in vitro anticholinesterase activity, to find out the combination index of synergistic combination. The synergistic combination and their individual extracts were subjected to total phenol, flavonoid and antioxidant activity estimation. Further, in vivo neurobehavioral studies in rats were carried out followed by TLC-MS-bioautographic identification of bioactive metabolites. Out of the sixteen extracts, aqueous extracts of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (WSA) and Myristica fragrans (L.) Dunal (MFA) were selected for the development of synergistic combination based on their IC50 value in vitro anticholinesterase assay. The synergistic combination inhibited the anticholinesterase activity significantly as compared to the individual extracts of WSA and MFA. The synergistic combination also showed more phenolic and flavonoid contents with potential antioxidant activity. The TLC-bioautography showed four white spots in WSA, signifying sitoindosides VII, VIII, quercetin, isopelletierine and Withanolide S as AChE inhibitory compounds while showing five white spots of anti-cholinesterase active metabolites identified as eugenol, methyl eugenol, myristic acid, galbacin and β-sitosterol in MFA. The observation of neurocognitive behavior in amnesia induced subjects manifested that both the synergistic combinations showed comparable results to that of standard piracetam, though the synergistic combination containing a higher concentration of WSA showed more appreciable results in ameliorating dementia in rats. The study suggests that the synergy based combination successfully enhanced memory and learning by abating free radical and acetylcholine levels, and increased learning and memory in rats, providing a strong rationale for its use in the treatment of dementia and Alzheimer's disease.Entities:
Keywords: Myristica fragrans; TLC-bioautography; Withania somnifera; anticholinesterase; neurodegenerative; synergy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34276370 PMCID: PMC8283279 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.678611
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Procurement of selected plants and their voucher specimen number.
| S.N. | Botanical name of the plants | Family | Plant part | References | Voucher number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Scrophulariaceae | Whole |
| BNPL/JH/MPH/MAK-18–01 |
| 2 |
| Piperaceae | Fruits |
| BNPL/JH/MPH/MAK-18–02 |
| 3 |
| Solanaceae | Roots |
| BNPL/JH/MPH/MAK-18–03 |
| 4 |
| Umbelliferae | Whole |
| BNPL/JH/MPH/MAK-18–04 |
| 5 |
| Valerianaceae | Rhizomes |
| BNPL/JH/MPH/MAK-18–05 |
| 6 |
| Myristicaceae | Aril |
| BNPL/JH/MPH/MAK-18–06 |
| 7 |
| Menispermaceae | Stem |
| BNPL/JH/MPH/MAK-18–07 |
| 8 |
| Leguminosae | Stem bark |
| BNPL/JH/MPH/MAK-18–08 |
Extractive values of selected plant extracts.
| S.N. | Plant name | % Extractive yield ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aqueous extract (A) | Hydro alcoholic extract (HA) | ||
| 1 |
| 7.82 ± 0.84 | 7.22 ± 0.72 |
| 2 |
| 6.58 ± 0.63 | 5.62 ± 0.69 |
| 3 |
| 10.62 ± 1.02 | 10.28 ± 1.24 |
| 4 |
| 16.67 ± 1.42 | 15.67 ± 1.53 |
| 5 |
| 8.23 ± 0.93 | 7.58 ± 0.91 |
| 6 |
| 6.45 ± 0.62 | 7.96 ± 1.16 |
| 7 |
| 7.62 ± 0.59 | 6.54 ± 0.71 |
| 8 |
| 7.28 ± 0.81 | 7.59 ± 0.83 |
FIGURE 1Anticholinesterase activity measured as IC50 value of selected plant extracts.
TLC profiling of WSA and MFA separated in toluene: ethyl acetate: acetic acid (7:2:1, v/v/v) at 254 and 366 nm.
| S.N. | Rf | WSA | MFA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Wavelength) | ||||||
| 254 | 366 | 254 | 366 | |||
| 1 | 0.04 | − | + | − | − | |
| 2 | 0.09 | + | − | − | − | |
| 3 | 0.17 | − | − | + | + | |
| 4 | 0.19 | + | − | − | − | |
| 5 | 0.28 | − | + | + | − | |
| 6 | 0.33 | + | − | − | − | |
| 7 | 0.40 | + | − | + | + | |
| 8 | 0.44 | − | + | + | + | |
| 9 | 0.54 | − | − | + | − | |
| 10 | 0.57 | + | − | − | − | |
| 11 | 0.61 | − | − | + | + | |
| 12 | 0.66 | − | − | + | − | |
| 13 | 0.71 | − | − | + | + | |
| 14 | 0.74 | − | + | − | − | |
| 15 | 0.79 | − | − | + | − | |
| 16 | 0.82 | + | − | + | + | |
| 17 | 0.92 | + | − | + | − | |
| 18 | 0.96 | − | − | + | − | |
Identified anticholinesterase active metabolites by TLC-MS-bioautography.
Identified metabolite in MFA.
Identified metabolite in WSA.
FIGURE 2TLC chromatograms of WSA and MFA at different wavelengths. (A1) WSA at 254 nm (A2) WSA at 366 nm (B1) MFA at 254 nm (B2) MFA at 366 nm.
FIGURE 3Developed TLC-bioautography plates of WSA represents AChE active spots and their mass spectroscopy.
FIGURE 4Developed TLC-bioautography plates of MFA represents AChE active spots and their mass spectroscopy.
Isolated bioactive metabolites from WSA and MFA through TLC-MS-bioautography.
| Extract | S.N. | Rf value | Tentative mass | Exact mass | Compound name | Chemical formula |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSA | 1 | 0.44 | 797.0 | 798.0 | Sitoindoside VII | C50H86O7 |
| 814.0 | 814.0 | Sitoindoside VIII | C50H86O8 | |||
| 2 | 0.74 | 301.0 | 302.04 | Quercetin | C15H10O7 | |
| 3 | 0.82 | 135.0 | 135.16 | Isopelletierine | C8H9NO | |
| 4 | 0.91 | 470.0 | 470.6 | Withanolide S | C28H40O8 | |
| MFA | 1 | 0.17 | 413.0 | 414.70 | β Sitosterol | C29H50O |
| 2 | 0.61 | 339.0 | 340.37 | Galbacin | C20H20O5 | |
| 3 | 0.66 | 227.0 | 228.20 | Myristic acid | C14H28O2 | |
| 4 | 0.78 | 179.0 | 178.23 | Methyleugenol | C11H14O2 | |
| 5 | 0.81 | 165.0 | 164.08 | Eugenol | C10H12O2 |
FIGURE 5Dynamics of escape latency in the spatial acquisition trial in reference memory test in male wistar rats in Morris water maze. There were five days acquisition trials with 30 s inter-trial intervals and each data point is the mean of four trials. The data is represented as Mean ± SEM. Each line in the plot shows the average of six mice in each group. Markers represent the differences ***p < 0.001 when compared to Scop group; analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test.
FIGURE 6Dynamics of percentage dwell time in the spatial acquisition trial in reference memory test in male wistar rats in Morris water maze. Each data point is marked on the day of probe trial and is the mean of four trials. The data is represented as Mean ± SEM. Each line in the plot shows the average of six mice in each group. Markers represent the differences ***p < 0.001 when compared to Scop group; analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test.
FIGURE 7Dynamics of transfer latency in the spatial acquisition trial in reference memory test in male wistar rats in Elevated plus maze. There were three days acquisition trials with 30s inter-trial intervals and each data point is the mean of four trials. The data is represented as Mean ± SEM. Markers represent the differences. Each line in the plot shows the average of six mice in each group. The data is represented as Mean ± SEM. Markers represent the differences **p < 0.001 and *p < 0.5 when compared to Scop group; analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test.