Literature DB >> 4049109

Standing and supine Cobb measures in girls with idiopathic scoliosis.

G Torell, A Nachemson, K Haderspeck-Grib, A Schultz.   

Abstract

The standing Cobb measure in a group of 287 girls with idiopathic scoliosis at the start of treatment was in the mean approximately 9 degrees larger than the supine Cobb measure. This mean standing-supine difference was essentially independent of curve severity expressed by the supine Cobb measure. Because of this, when the difference was expressed as a percentage of the supine Cobb measure, the mean values of this ratio decreased substantially with increasing curve severity. The mean difference decreased only slightly with age through adolescence, indicating that spine lateral curves stiffen little as patients mature. The standard deviations in the standing minus supine Cobb differences were approximately 6 degrees in the majority of the age and severity groupings studied. Ninety-three percent of these patients had standing-supine Cobb measure differences that were between 0 degrees and 20 degrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4049109     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198506000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  29 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the Providence nighttime bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of 36 female patients.

Authors:  Timo Yrjönen; Mauno Ylikoski; Dietrich Schlenzka; Riitta Kinnunen; Mikko Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A semi-automatic 3D ultrasound reconstruction method to assess the true severity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Quang N Vo; Lawrence H Le; Edmond Lou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Adult lumbar scoliosis: underreported on lumbar MR scans.

Authors:  Z Anwar; E Zan; S K Gujar; D M Sciubba; L H Riley; Z L Gokaslan; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.

Authors:  Ricarda Lechner; David Putzer; Dietmar Dammerer; Michael Liebensteiner; Christian Bach; Martin Thaler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Accuracy and applicability of measurement of the scoliotic angle at the frontal plane by Cobb's method, by Ferguson's method and by a new method.

Authors:  K M Diab; J A Sevastik; R Hedlund; I A Suliman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Adults with idiopathic scoliosis improve disability after motor and cognitive rehabilitation: results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marco Monticone; Emilia Ambrosini; Daniele Cazzaniga; Barbara Rocca; Lorenzo Motta; Cesare Cerri; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Alessio Lovi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Visualisation of the brace effect on the spinal profile in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Alfred Schmitz; Roy König; Jörg Kandyba; Peter Pennekamp; Ottmar Schmitt; Ursula E Jaeger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Charles E Mackel; Ajit Jada; Amer F Samdani; James H Stephen; James T Bennett; Ali A Baaj; Steven W Hwang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Measurement of vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with low-dose CT in prone position - method description and reliability analysis.

Authors:  Kasim Abul-Kasim; Magnus K Karlsson; Ralph Hasserius; Acke Ohlin
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.