Andrew C Meltzer1, Pamela Katzen Burrows2, Allan B Wolfson3, Judd E Hollander4, Michael Kurz5, Ziya Kirkali6, John W Kusek6, Patrick Mufarrij7, Stephen V Jackman8, Jeremy Brown9. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC. 2. The George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham. 6. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 7. Department of Urology, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC. 8. Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 9. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract
Importance: Urinary stone disease is a common presentation in the emergency department, and α-adrenergic receptor blockers, such as tamsulosin, are commonly used to facilitate stone passage. Objective: To determine if tamsulosin promotes the passage of urinary stones within 28 days among emergency department patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial from 2008 to 2009 (first phase) and then from 2012 to 2016 (second phase). Participants were followed for 90 days. The first phase was conducted at a single US emergency department; the second phase was conducted at 6 US emergency departments. Adult patients were eligible to participate if they presented with a symptomatic urinary stone in the ureter less than 9 mm in diameter, as demonstrated on computed tomography. Interventions: Participants were randomized to treatment with either tamsulosin, 0.4 mg, or matching placebo daily for 28 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was stone passage based on visualization or capture by the study participant by day 28. Secondary outcomes included crossover to open-label tamsulosin, time to stone passage, return to work, use of analgesic medication, hospitalization, surgical intervention, and repeated emergency department visit for urinary stones. Results:The mean age of 512 participants randomized totamsulosin or placebowas 40.6 years (range, 18-74 years), 139 (27.1%) were female, and 110 (22.8%) were nonwhite. The mean (SD) diameter of the urinary stones was 3.8 (1.4) mm. Four hundred ninety-seven patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Stone passage rates were 50% in the tamsulosin group and 47% in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.05; 95.8% CI, 0.87-1.27; P = .60), a nonsignificant difference. None of the secondary outcomes were significantly different. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle, although patients lost to follow-up before stone passage were excluded from the analysis of final outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Tamsulosin did not significantly increase the stone passage rate compared with placebo. Our findings do not support the use of tamsulosin for symptomatic urinary stones smaller than 9 mm. Guidelines for medical expulsive therapy for urinary stones may need to be revised. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00382265.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Urinary stone disease is a common presentation in the emergency department, and α-adrenergic receptor blockers, such as tamsulosin, are commonly used to facilitate stone passage. Objective: To determine if tamsulosin promotes the passage of urinary stones within 28 days among emergency department patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial from 2008 to 2009 (first phase) and then from 2012 to 2016 (second phase). Participants were followed for 90 days. The first phase was conducted at a single US emergency department; the second phase was conducted at 6 US emergency departments. Adult patients were eligible to participate if they presented with a symptomatic urinary stone in the ureter less than 9 mm in diameter, as demonstrated on computed tomography. Interventions: Participants were randomized to treatment with either tamsulosin, 0.4 mg, or matching placebo daily for 28 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was stone passage based on visualization or capture by the study participant by day 28. Secondary outcomes included crossover to open-label tamsulosin, time to stone passage, return to work, use of analgesic medication, hospitalization, surgical intervention, and repeated emergency department visit for urinary stones. Results: The mean age of 512 participants randomized to tamsulosin or placebo was 40.6 years (range, 18-74 years), 139 (27.1%) were female, and 110 (22.8%) were nonwhite. The mean (SD) diameter of the urinary stones was 3.8 (1.4) mm. Four hundred ninety-seven patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Stone passage rates were 50% in the tamsulosin group and 47% in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.05; 95.8% CI, 0.87-1.27; P = .60), a nonsignificant difference. None of the secondary outcomes were significantly different. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle, although patients lost to follow-up before stone passage were excluded from the analysis of final outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Tamsulosin did not significantly increase the stone passage rate compared with placebo. Our findings do not support the use of tamsulosin for symptomatic urinary stones smaller than 9 mm. Guidelines for medical expulsive therapy for urinary stones may need to be revised. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00382265.
Authors: Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Dean Assimos; Amy Krambeck; Nicole L Miller; Manoj Monga; M Hassan Murad; Caleb P Nelson; Kenneth T Pace; Vernon M Pais; Margaret S Pearle; Glenn M Preminger; Hassan Razvi; Ojas Shah; Brian R Matlaga Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ralph C Wang; Newton Addo; Thomas Chi; Christopher Moore; Michael Mallin; Stephen Shiboski; Marshall Stoller; Rebecca Smith-Bindman Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Jeremy S Furyk; Kevin Chu; Colin Banks; Jaimi Greenslade; Gerben Keijzers; Ogilvie Thom; Tom Torpie; Carl Dux; Rajan Narula Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: John M Hollingsworth; Benjamin K Canales; Mary A M Rogers; Shyam Sukumar; Phyllis Yan; Gretchen M Kuntz; Philipp Dahm Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-12-01
Authors: Andrew C Meltzer; Pamela Katzen Burrows; Ziya Kirkali; Judd E Hollander; Michael Kurz; Patrick Mufarrij; Allan B Wolfson; Cora MacPherson; Scott Hubosky; Nataly Montano; Stephen V Jackman Journal: Urology Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Andrew C Meltzer; Allan B Wolfson; Patrick Mufarrij; Cora MacPherson; Nataly Montano; Ziya Kirkali; Pamela Katzen Burrows; Stephen V Jackman Journal: J Endourol Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 2.619