Literature DB >> 29912962

Novel genetic associations for blood pressure identified via gene-alcohol interaction in up to 570K individuals across multiple ancestries.

Mary F Feitosa1, Aldi T Kraja1, Daniel I Chasman2,3, Yun J Sung4, Thomas W Winkler5, Ioanna Ntalla6, Xiuqing Guo7, Nora Franceschini8, Ching-Yu Cheng9,10,11, Xueling Sim12, Dina Vojinovic13, Jonathan Marten14, Solomon K Musani15, Changwei Li16, Amy R Bentley17, Michael R Brown18, Karen Schwander4, Melissa A Richard19, Raymond Noordam20, Hugues Aschard21,22, Traci M Bartz23, Lawrence F Bielak24, Rajkumar Dorajoo25, Virginia Fisher26, Fernando P Hartwig27,28, Andrea R V R Horimoto29, Kurt K Lohman30, Alisa K Manning31,32, Tuomo Rankinen33, Albert V Smith34,35, Salman M Tajuddin36, Mary K Wojczynski1, Maris Alver37, Mathilde Boissel38, Qiuyin Cai39, Archie Campbell40, Jin Fang Chai12, Xu Chen41, Jasmin Divers30, Chuan Gao42, Anuj Goel43,44, Yanick Hagemeijer45, Sarah E Harris46,47, Meian He48, Fang-Chi Hsu30, Anne U Jackson49, Mika Kähönen50,51, Anuradhani Kasturiratne52, Pirjo Komulainen53, Brigitte Kühnel54,55, Federica Laguzzi56, Jian'an Luan57, Nana Matoba58, Ilja M Nolte59, Sandosh Padmanabhan60, Muhammad Riaz61,62, Rico Rueedi63,64, Antonietta Robino65, M Abdullah Said45, Robert A Scott57, Tamar Sofer32,66, Alena Stančáková67, Fumihiko Takeuchi68, Bamidele O Tayo69, Peter J van der Most59, Tibor V Varga70, Veronique Vitart14, Yajuan Wang71, Erin B Ware72, Helen R Warren6,73, Stefan Weiss74,75, Wanqing Wen39, Lisa R Yanek76, Weihua Zhang77,78, Jing Hua Zhao57, Saima Afaq77, Najaf Amin13, Marzyeh Amini59, Dan E Arking79, Tin Aung9,10,11, Eric Boerwinkle80,81, Ingrid Borecki1, Ulrich Broeckel82, Morris Brown6,73, Marco Brumat83, Gregory L Burke84, Mickaël Canouil38, Aravinda Chakravarti79, Sabanayagam Charumathi9,10, Yii-Der Ida Chen7, John M Connell85, Adolfo Correa15, Lisa de Las Fuentes4,86, Renée de Mutsert87, H Janaka de Silva88, Xuan Deng26, Jingzhong Ding89, Qing Duan90, Charles B Eaton91, Georg Ehret92, Ruben N Eppinga45, Evangelos Evangelou77,93, Jessica D Faul72, Stephan B Felix75,94, Nita G Forouhi57, Terrence Forrester95, Oscar H Franco13, Yechiel Friedlander96, Ilaria Gandin83, He Gao77, Mohsen Ghanbari13,97, Bruna Gigante56, C Charles Gu4, Dongfeng Gu98, Saskia P Hagenaars46,99, Göran Hallmans100, Tamara B Harris101, Jiang He102,103, Sami Heikkinen67,104, Chew-Kiat Heng105,106, Makoto Hirata107, Barbara V Howard108,109, M Arfan Ikram13,110,111, Ulrich John75,112, Tomohiro Katsuya113,114, Chiea Chuen Khor25,115, Tuomas O Kilpeläinen116,117, Woon-Puay Koh12,118, José E Krieger29, Stephen B Kritchevsky119, Michiaki Kubo120, Johanna Kuusisto67, Timo A Lakka53,104,121, Carl D Langefeld30, Claudia Langenberg57, Lenore J Launer101, Benjamin Lehne77, Cora E Lewis122, Yize Li4, Shiow Lin1, Jianjun Liu12,25, Jingmin Liu123, Marie Loh77,124, Tin Louie125, Reedik Mägi37, Colin A McKenzie95, Thomas Meitinger126,127, Andres Metspalu37, Yuri Milaneschi128, Lili Milani37, Karen L Mohlke90, Yukihide Momozawa129, Mike A Nalls130,131, Christopher P Nelson61,62, Nona Sotoodehnia132, Jill M Norris133, Jeff R O'Connell134,135, Nicholette D Palmer136, Thomas Perls137, Nancy L Pedersen41, Annette Peters55,138, Patricia A Peyser24, Neil Poulter139, Leslie J Raffel140, Olli T Raitakari141,142, Kathryn Roll7, Lynda M Rose2, Frits R Rosendaal87, Jerome I Rotter7, Carsten O Schmidt143, Pamela J Schreiner144, Nicole Schupf145, William R Scott77,146, Peter S Sever146, Yuan Shi9, Stephen Sidney147, Mario Sims15, Colleen M Sitlani148, Jennifer A Smith24,72, Harold Snieder59, John M Starr46,149, Konstantin Strauch150,151, Heather M Stringham49, Nicholas Y Q Tan9, Hua Tang152, Kent D Taylor7, Yik Ying Teo12,25,153,154,155, Yih Chung Tham9, Stephen T Turner156, André G Uitterlinden13,157, Peter Vollenweider158, Melanie Waldenberger54,55, Lihua Wang1, Ya Xing Wang159,160, Wen Bin Wei160, Christine Williams1, Jie Yao7, Caizheng Yu48, Jian-Min Yuan161,162, Wei Zhao24, Alan B Zonderman163, Diane M Becker76, Michael Boehnke49, Donald W Bowden136, John C Chambers77,78,164,165,166, Ian J Deary46,99, Tõnu Esko37,167, Martin Farrall43,44, Paul W Franks70,168, Barry I Freedman169, Philippe Froguel38,170, Paolo Gasparini65,83, Christian Gieger54,171, Jost Bruno Jonas159,172, Yoichiro Kamatani58, Norihiro Kato68, Jaspal S Kooner78,146,165,166, Zoltán Kutalik64,173, Markku Laakso67, Cathy C Laurie125, Karin Leander56, Terho Lehtimäki174,175, Lifelines Cohort Study176, Patrik K E Magnusson41, Albertine J Oldehinkel177, Brenda W J H Penninx128, Ozren Polasek178,179,180, David J Porteous40, Rainer Rauramaa53, Nilesh J Samani61,62, James Scott146, Xiao-Ou Shu39, Pim van der Harst45,181, Lynne E Wagenknecht84, Nicholas J Wareham57, Hugh Watkins43,44, David R Weir72, Ananda R Wickremasinghe52, Tangchun Wu48, Wei Zheng39, Claude Bouchard33, Kaare Christensen182, Michele K Evans36, Vilmundur Gudnason34,35, Bernardo L Horta27, Sharon L R Kardia24, Yongmei Liu183, Alexandre C Pereira29, Bruce M Psaty184,185, Paul M Ridker2,3, Rob M van Dam12,186, W James Gauderman187, Xiaofeng Zhu71, Dennis O Mook-Kanamori87,188, Myriam Fornage18,19, Charles N Rotimi17, L Adrienne Cupples26,189, Tanika N Kelly102, Ervin R Fox190, Caroline Hayward14, Cornelia M van Duijn13, E Shyong Tai12,118,186, Tien Yin Wong9,10,11, Charles Kooperberg191, Walter Palmas192, Kenneth Rice125, Alanna C Morrison18, Paul Elliott166, Mark J Caulfield6,73, Patricia B Munroe6,73, Dabeeru C Rao4, Michael A Province1, Daniel Levy189,193.   

Abstract

Heavy alcohol consumption is an established risk factor for hypertension; the mechanism by which alcohol consumption impact blood pressure (BP) regulation remains unknown. We hypothesized that a genome-wide association study accounting for gene-alcohol consumption interaction for BP might identify additional BP loci and contribute to the understanding of alcohol-related BP regulation. We conducted a large two-stage investigation incorporating joint testing of main genetic effects and single nucleotide variant (SNV)-alcohol consumption interactions. In Stage 1, genome-wide discovery meta-analyses in ≈131K individuals across several ancestry groups yielded 3,514 SNVs (245 loci) with suggestive evidence of association (P < 1.0 x 10-5). In Stage 2, these SNVs were tested for independent external replication in ≈440K individuals across multiple ancestries. We identified and replicated (at Bonferroni correction threshold) five novel BP loci (380 SNVs in 21 genes) and 49 previously reported BP loci (2,159 SNVs in 109 genes) in European ancestry, and in multi-ancestry meta-analyses (P < 5.0 x 10-8). For African ancestry samples, we detected 18 potentially novel BP loci (P < 5.0 x 10-8) in Stage 1 that warrant further replication. Additionally, correlated meta-analysis identified eight novel BP loci (11 genes). Several genes in these loci (e.g., PINX1, GATA4, BLK, FTO and GABBR2) have been previously reported to be associated with alcohol consumption. These findings provide insights into the role of alcohol consumption in the genetic architecture of hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29912962      PMCID: PMC6005576          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD)[1], which in 2015 alone was estimated to cause about 10.7 million deaths worldwide[2]. The prevalence of hypertension in the US is ~46% for those of African ancestry compared to ~33% for European ancestry and ~30% for Hispanic ancestry[3] based on previous blood pressure (BP) guidelines (The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention)[4]. Recently, based on the 2017 American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association high BP guideline, the overall prevalence of hypertension among US adults is estimated at 45.6%[5]. Blood pressure levels are influenced by alcohol consumption independently of adiposity, sodium intake, smoking and socio-economic status[6]. Alcohol shows a dose-dependent effect on systolic BP (SBP) after adjusting for environmental confounders[7]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 400 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) for BP[8-14] and about 30 SNVs for alcohol consumption[Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2014 ">15-17]. However, few studies have explored SNV-alcohol interactions in relation to BP[18, 19], in part due to the large sample sizes required to obtain adequate power[18, 20]. SNVs, which effect differ by level of alcohol consumption, can harbor modest marginal effects and might therefore be missed by standard marginal effects association screening. As previously demonstrated, a joint test of main genetic effect and gene-environmental interaction can have higher power[21] to identify such variants. Within the CHARGE Gene-Lifestyle Interactions Working Group[22, 23], we studied a total of 571,652 adults across multiple ancestries to identify variants associated with SBP, diastolic BP (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP). We tested a model that included a joint model of SNV main effect on BP and SNV-alcohol consumption interaction, in each ancestry and across ancestries. Alcohol consumption was defined by two categories: (I) as current drinking (yes/no), and (II) in the subset of drinkers, as light/heavy drinking (1–7 drinks/week or ≥8 drinks/week). Individual cohort results were meta-analyzed using a modified version of METAL applicable to the statistics summary results accounting for interactions[24]. We also performed multi-trait correlated meta-analyses[25, 26] in participants of European ancestry using the joint model P-values from each meta-analysis of all four BP traits.

Results

Genetic associations for BP identified via gene-alcohol interaction

The overall description of the CHARGE Gene-Lifestyle Interactions Working Group was previously reported[22, 23]. We studied the joint model of SNV main effect and SNV-alcohol consumption interaction for BP in a two-stage study design, as depicted in S1 Fig. GWAS discovery (Stage 1), was conducted in each of 47 multi-ancestry cohorts including a total of 130,828 individuals of African ancestry (N = 21,417), Asian ancestry (N = 9,838), Brazilian (4,415), European ancestry (N = 91,102), and Hispanic ancestry (N = 4,056) (S1–S4 Tables and S1 Note). A total of 3,514 SNVs (245 loci) attained P < 1.0 x 10−5 in Stage 1 meta-analyses (for at least one combination of BP trait and alcohol consumption status in one ancestry or multi-ancestries). We considered a locus to be independent, if our lead variant (i.e., most significant) was in low linkage disequilibrium (LD, r2 ≤ 0.2) and at least 500 kb away from any variant associated with BP in previous GWAS (P ≤ 5.0 x 10−8). The meta-analysis distributions of–log10 P-values of observed versus–log10 P-values expected (QQ plots) are shown in S2 and S3 Figs. The 3,514 SNVs were taken forward to replication, Stage 2, which included 440,824 individuals from 68 cohorts of African ancestry (N = 5,041), Asian ancestry (N = 141,026), European ancestry (N = 281,380), and Hispanic ancestry (N = 13,377, S5–S8 Tables and S1 Note). We identified and replicated (Stage 2, at Bonferroni correction P < 0.0002) five novel BP loci in European ancestry, four loci on 8p23.1 and one locus (FTO) on 16q12.2, which included 380 SNVs in 21 genes. These findings achieved genome-wide statistical significance (P < 5.0 x 10−8) in Stage 1 and Stage 2 combined meta-analyses. Tables 1 and 2 show the most significant SNVs per BP trait, per alcohol consumption and gene for European ancestry participants. The loci containing novel BP associations at 8p23.1 were detected for all four BP traits in current drinkers and in light/heavy drinkers. The regional association plots on chromosomes 8p23 and 16q12 in European ancestry are shown in S4 and S5 Figs. For African ancestry, 18 potentially novel BP loci were found in discovery (P ≤ 5.0 x 10−8), but without replication (Table 3). Further, we performed combined meta-analyses of Stage 1 and Stage 2 across all ancestries, which reproduced our European ancestry findings (P ≤ 5.0 x 10−8, Table 4 and S9 Table). We also identified and replicated 49 previously reported BP loci (2,159 SNVs in 109 genes) for European ancestry participants (S10 Table). For African Ancestry, and multi-ancestry analyses, additional reported BP loci were significant (P < 5.0 x 10−8) in Stage 1 and Stage 2 combined meta-analyses (S11 and S12 Tables). Manhattan plots for BP trait and alcohol consumption status are shown in S6–S15 Figs, for Stage 1 and Stage 2 combined meta-analyses of European, African and Asian ancestries.
Table 1

Novel SNVs/Genes associated with BP traits in European ancestry.

Stage 1 (S1)Stage 2 (S2)S1 & S2
SNVChrPositionGeneNear GeneRoleA1/2Frq1TraitDrinkb_Mb_IP-Valueb_Mb_IP-ValueP-Meta
rs297917288452998LOC107986913SGK223C/G0.48PPLHD0.240.257.59 x 10−60.32-0.205.13 X 10−66.17 X 10−10
rs292106488459127LOC107986913SGK223T/C0.45PPCURD0.190.107.76 X 10−60.24-0.023.63 X 10−92.69 x 10−14
rs297918188465578LOC107986913SGK223A/T0.52SBPCURD-0.25-0.239.33 x 10−8-0.350.011.15 x 10−107.41 x 10−18
rs297918188465578LOC107986913SGK223A/T0.52SBPLHD-0.47-0.145.37 x 10−7-0.420.164.79 x 10−53.98 x 10−11
rs298075588506173LOC105379224SGK223A/G0.55PPLHD-0.28-0.204.17 x 10−6-0.320.174.90 x 10−61.35 x 10−10
rs298075588506173LOC105379224SGK223A/G0.55SBPLHD-0.49-0.202.63 x 10−7-0.420.125.25 x 10−52.51 x 10−11
rs1327019488520592LOC105379224SGK223T/C0.51SBPCURD-0.26-0.242.46 x 10−8-0.420.051.23 x 10−122.34 x 10−20
rs699540788527137LOC105379224SGK223C/G0.51PPCURD-0.16-0.157.59 x 10−7-0.250.022.34 x 10−102.34 x 10−16
rs45330189172877LOC102724880PPP1R3BT/G0.51SBPCURD-0.17-0.331.59 x 10−6-0.27-0.088.13 x 10−101.23 x 10−15
rs1177491589331252LOC157273 IntronT/C0.33SBPCURD0.450.011.02 x 10−70.35-0.057.94 x 10−88.91 x 10−15
rs660130289381948LOC105379231LOC157273IntronT/G0.24SBPCURD0.350.177.94 x 10−70.200.067.59 x 10−52.57 x 10−10
rs3523127589762399TNKS IntronA/T0.31PPCURD-0.380.031.26 x 10−6-0.05-0.123.31 x 10−41.35 x 10−8
rs197667189822124TNKS A/G0.62SBPCURD-0.21-0.314.68 x 10−8-0.37-0.022.24 x 10−107.24 x 10−18
rs5586851489822890TNKS T/C0.38DBPCURD0.200.091.32 x 10−60.170.011.20 x 10−71.70 x 10−13
rs48391689936091MIR124-1 A/C0.47DBPCURD0.250.011.18 x 10−60.040.141.29 x 10−65.89 x 10−12
rs48391689936091MIR124-1 A/C0.47PPCURD0.200.097.94 x 10−60.160.034.68 x 10−126.61 x 10−17
rs48391689936091MIR124-1 A/C0.47SBPCURD0.380.171.05 x 10−90.210.163.24 x 10−113.31 x 10−20
rs61563289938811MIR124-1 T/C0.53SBPLHD-0.50-0.307.41 x 10−9-0.400.091.07 x 10−43.63 x 10−12
rs965062289946782LOC105379235MIR124-1T/G0.53DBPCURD-0.24-0.014.07 x 10−6-0.12-0.071.10 x 10−74.27 x 10−13
rs5624351189948185LOC105379235MIR124-1T/C0.47SBPCURD0.370.112.57 x 10−80.270.141.91 x 10−131.74 x 10−21
rs65631989956901LOC105379235MIR124-1A/G0.45MAPLHD0.290.201.29 x 10−60.240.066.03 x 10−57.59 x 10−11
rs65631989956901LOC105379235MIR124-1A/G0.45SBPLHD0.390.358.71 x 10−70.430.011.62 x 10−61.59 x 10−12
rs11786677810406750MSRA IntronA/G0.58SBPCURD-0.25-0.222.57 x 10−7-0.400.031.35 x 10−425.62 x 10−49
rs2062331810122482MSRA IntronA/G0.54DBPCURD-0.18-0.152.00 x 10−8-0.180.007.59 x 10−85.01 x 10−15
rs11993089810152442MSRA IntronT/G0.42PPCURD0.240.055.25 x 10−60.32-0.134.68 x 10−186.17 x 10−23
rs7832708810332530MSRA IntronT/C0.49SBPLHD0.550.072.19 x 10−80.42-0.092.19 x 10−55.89 x 10−13
rs4841409810658864RP1L1 A/G0.44MAPCURD0.180.147.59 x 10−70.27-0.129.77 x 10−65.13 x 10−11
rs4841409810658864RP1L1 A/G0.44MAPLHD0.37-0.146.03 x 10−60.36-0.192.14 x 10−66.46 x 10−12
rs4841409810658864RP1L1 A/G0.44SBPCURD0.230.251.91 x 10−70.320.129.55 x 10−164.90 x 10−23
rs10096777810660990RP1L1 A/G0.56SBPLHD-0.520.101.55 x 10−6-0.600.392.88 x 10−83.80 x 10−14
rs7814795810661775MIR4286 T/C0.55MAPCURD-0.18-0.147.59 x 10−7-0.220.081.45 x 10−49.77 x 10−10
rs7814795810661775MIR4286 T/C0.55SBPCURD-0.22-0.261.78 x 10−7-0.2-0.152.29 x 10−141.48 x 10−21
rs7814795810661775MIR4286 T/C0.55SBPLHD-0.500.062.04 x 10−6-0.590.383.80 x 10−87.76 x 10−14

The most significantly associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38); Role: Intronic, Non-coding transcript (NCT) or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no), LHD, Light(1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/week) drinker; Stage 1, Discovery cohorts; Stage 2, Replication cohorts; S1 & S2,Combined Discovery and Replication; b_M, beta coefficient of SNV; b_I: SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect; P-Value: modified-interaction METAL P-Value; P-Meta, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of Meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2.

Table 2

Novel SNVs/Genes associated with BP traits in European ancestry.

Stage 1 (S1)Stage 2 (S2)S1 & S2
SNVChrPositionGeneNear GeneRoleA1/2Frq1TraitDrinkb_Mb_IP-Valueb_Mb_IP-ValueP-Meta
rs28680211810661935MIR4286 A/T0.55MAPLHD-0.360.137.76 x 10−6-0.350.193.98 x 10−61.59 x 10−11
rs13276026810752445LOC102723313SOX7IntronA/G0.56SBPCURD-0.23-0.235.62 x 10−7-0.26-0.192.29 x 10−153.98 x 10−22
rs7814757810817678PINX1 IntronT/C0.40SBPCURD0.240.227.94 x 10−70.210.268.71 x 10−162.63 x 10−22
rs4841465810962344XKR6 IntronT/C0.52SBPCURD-0.21-0.276.17 x 10−7-0.21-0.216.03 x 10−141.41 x 10−20
rs4841465810962344XKR6 IntronT/C0.52SBPLHD-0.51-0.103.89 x 10−7-0.430.044.07 x 10−61.23 x 10−12
rs9969423811398066FAM167A-AS1C8orf12IntronA/C0.50SBPCURD0.210.23.98 X 10−60.290.011.20 x 10−75.37 x 10−13
rs9969423811398066FAM167A-AS1C8orf12IntronA/C0.50SBPLHD0.52-0.094.90 X 10−60.38-0.071.95 X 10−48.13 X 10−10
rs12156009811427710FAM167AC8orf12IntronA/C0.51SBPCURD0.290.211.66 X 10−70.170.101.02 X 10−55.37 X 10−12
rs13255193811451683FAM167AFAM167AIntronT/C0.46SBPLHD0.53-0.116.76 X 10−70.36-0.117.76 X 10−46.17 X 10−10
rs6983727811558303BLK IntronT/C0.48PPCURD-0.15-0.154.68 X 10−6-0.17-0.081.66 X 10−105.89 X 10−16
rs6983727811558303BLK IntronT/C0.48PPLHD-0.24-0.255.89 X 10−6-0.260.076.03 X 10−51.74 X 10−9
rs6983727811558303BLK IntronT/C0.48SBPLHD-0.47-0.174.27 X 10−7-0.340.001.55 X 10−41 X 10−10
rs34190028811559641BLK IntronT/G0.48SBPCURD-0.16-0.315.13 X 10−7-0.36-0.043.47 X 10−131.26 X 10−19
rs899366811572976LINC00208 A/G0.33MAPCURD0.150.183.39 X 10−60.280.003.47 X 10−791.51 X 10−82
rs7464263811576667LINC00208 NCTA/T0.48SBPLHD0.480.246.03 X 10−80.41-0.083.72 X 10−54.37 X 10−12
rs1478894811591245LINC00208 T/C0.36SBPCURD0.330.211.00 X 10−80.240.163.31 X 10−112.51 X 10−19
rs4841569811594668LINC00208 A/G0.42PPCURD-0.10-0.281.95 X 10−7-0.07-0.181.23 X 10−104.17 X 10−17
rs4841569811594668LINC00208 A/G0.42PPLHD-0.27-0.442.88 X 10−8-0.280.082.40 X 10−54.79 X 10−11
rs17807624811605506LINC00208 T/C0.35DBPCURD0.110.205.37 X 10−60.140.058.13 X 10−86.03 X 10−13
rs17807624811605506LINC00208 T/C0.35MAPLHD0.45-0.225.13 X 10−70.32-0.166.03 X 10−52.57 X 10−11
rs13280442811610048LOC105379242LINC00208C/G0.55MAPCURD0.230.111.29 X 10−60.28-0.174.90 X 10−41.62 X 10−8
rs13280442811610048LOC105379242LINC00208C/G0.55MAPLHD0.40-0.113.39 X 10−60.28-0.015.25 X 10−51.38 X 10−10
rs13280442811610048LOC105379242LINC00208C/G0.55SBPCURD0.300.248.32 X 10−80.48-0.031.91 X 10−169.12 X 10−24
rs13280442811610048LOC105379242LINC00208C/G0.55SBPLHD0.570.101.38 X 10−70.50-0.104.68 X 10−75.01 X 10−14
rs13250871811610254LOC105379242LINC00208A/G0.4PPCURD-0.10-0.278.51 X 10−7-0.21-0.102.63 X 10−171.91 X 10−23
rs13250871811610254LOC105379242LINC00208A/G0.39PPLHD-0.24-0.497.59 X 10−8-0.290.102.69 X 10−52.14 X 10−10
rs36038176811752486GATA4 IntronT/C0.28SBPCURD-0.21-0.291.07 X 10−6-0.390.153.89 X 10−53.24 X 10−10
rs558727251653775211FTO IntronT/C0.41SBPCURD0.69-0.313.39 X 10−90.36-0.162.14 X 10−52.40 X 10−13
rs71857351653788739FTO IntronA/G0.59PPCURD-0.360.076.31 X 10−8-0.250.143.31 X 10−42.09 X 10−10

The most significantly associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38); Role: Intronic, Non-coding transcript (NCT) or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no), LHD, Light(1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/week) drinker; Stage 1, Discovery cohorts; Stage 2, Replication cohorts; S1 & S2,Combined Discovery and Replication; b_M, beta coefficient of SNV; b_I: SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect; P-Value: modified-interaction METAL P-Value; P-Meta, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of Meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2.

Table 3

Potential novel SNVs/Genes associated with BP traits in African ancestry.

Stage 1 (S1)Stage 2 (S2)S1 & S2
SNVChrPositionGeneNear GeneRoleA1/2Frq1TraitDrinkb_Mb_IP-Valueb_Mb_IP-ValueP-Meta
rs80158983665489746EYSEYSintronT/C0.02SBPCURD3.53-10.051.29 x 10−80.95-3.088.32 x 10−16.92 x 10−9
rs769875546133759717TARIDMGC34034, SGK1intronT/C0.09SBPCURD-2.450.802.19 x 10−8-1.48-0.422.09 x 10−11.86 x 10−9
rs79505281835841899UNC5D A/C0.02PPCURD-5.661.266.03 x 10−71.50-6.672.82 x 10−33.24 x 10−9
rs115888294894105161CDH17 T/C0.93PPCURD-1.18-0.551.59 x 10−7-0.71-0.842.19 x 10−11.29 x 10−8
rs73655199998145201CORO2AGABBR2intronA/G0.01PPCURD-5.09-0.133.16 x 10−9-0.45-2.712.95 x 10−11.41 x 10−9
rs42531971049473111ERCC6CHATintronA/G0.89PPCURD0.660.676.61 x 10−7-0.802.573.63 x 10−24.90 x 10−8
rs1120050910122256927TACC2 C/G0.17PPLHD-0.27-4.056.76 x 10−91.72-2.921.45 x 10−11.00 x 10−8
rs107415341111233360GALNT18 T/C0.09SBPCURD2.34-3.768.32 x 10−80.94-2.762.29 x 10−11.18 x 10−8
rs13907748111107579224ELMOD1 T/C0.99PPCURD-3.1810.411.32 x 10−7-0.814.673.47 x 10−13.39 x 10−8
rs1405209441829508647LOC105372045MIR302F T/G0.02PPCURD-0.49-4.831 x 10−121.94-3.306.03 x 10−14.07 x 10−13
rs1426736851931669942LOC105372361THEG5 T/C0.01PPCURD-3.04-2.205.01 x 10−8-2.922.294.47 x 10−13.63 x 10−8
Stage 1 (S1)No Stage 2 (S2)
SNVChrPositionGeneNear GeneRoleA1/2Frq1TraitDrinkb_Mb_IP-Value
rs98623443178283140LOC105374235KCNMB2, KCNMB2-IT1T/C0.02SBPCURD3.53-10.051.29 x 10−8
rs738843513178287933LOC105374235KCNMB2, KCNMB2-IT1T/C0.09SBPCURD-2.450.802.19 x 10−8
rs145429126447000363GABRB1GABRA4intronA/C0.02PPCURD-5.661.266.03 x 10−7
rs61494734929196976LINGO2intronT/C0.93PPCURD-1.18-0.551.59 x 10−7
rs20138395110119468517GRK5BAG3A/G0.01PPCURD-5.09-0.133.16 x 10−9
rs1863317801261317029LOC105369793FAM19A2A/G0.89PPCURD0.660.676.61 x 10−7
rs1878888441367705907LOC105370250PCDH9 C/G0.17PPLHD-0.27-4.056.76 x 10−9
rs11646449613105934773LINC00343 T/C0.09SBPCURD2.34-3.768.32 x 10−8

The most significantly associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38); Role: Intronic or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no), LHD, Light(1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/week) drinker; Stage 1, Discovery cohorts; Stage 2, Replication cohorts; S1 & S2,Combined Discovery and Replication; b_M, beta coefficient of SNV; b_I: SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect; P-Value: modified-interaction METAL P-Value; P-Meta, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of Meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2

Table 4

Novel SNVs/Genes associated with BP traits in Multi-ancestry meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2.

Stage 1 and Stage 2
SNVChrPositionGeneNear GeneRoleA1/2Frq1AncestryTraitDrinkb_Mb_IP-MetaN
rs1009296588515975LOC105379224SGK223A/G0.53EA, HADBPCURD-0.190.011.74 x 10−12373,915
rs782305688525195LOC105379224SGK223A/G0.5AA, EAPPLHD-0.310.103.31 x 10−11161,080
rs782305688525195LOC105379224SGK223A/G0.41AA, EASBPLHD-0.440.111.38 x 10−11214,814
rs45330189172877LOC102724880PPP1R3BT/G0.5EA, HADBPCURD-0.13-0.074.90 x 10−12365,537
rs1050338789293015LOC157273T/C0.37AA, EASBPCURD0.320.031.07 x 10−14381,431
rs1178100889295729LOC157273T/G0.37EA, HADBPCURD0.130.071.05 x 10−11373,915
rs438397489761838TNKSintronC/G0.7AA, EASBPCURD-0.28-0.082.04 x 10−13381,431
rs928606089795635TNKSA/C0.38AA, EADBPCURD0.21-0.022.29 x 10−13371,053
rs34919878810241994MSRAintronA/G0.41EA, HADBPCURD-0.18-0.055.75 x 10−17365,537
rs4841294810247558MSRAintronA/C0.43AA, EASBPLHD-0.400.012.69 x 10−10166,956
rs17693945810248500MSRAintronT/C0.41AA, EAMAPLHD-0.300.081.51 x 10−9166,054
rs13276026810752445LOC102723313PINX1intronA/G0.55EA, HADBPCURD-0.11-0.104.47 x 10−14373,915
rs13276026810752445LOC102723313PINX1intronA/G0.55EA, HAMAPCURD-0.15-0.034.68 x 10−9373,911
rs13276026810752445LOC102723313PINX1intronA/G0.55EA, HASBPCURD-0.22-0.243.89 x 10−23373,919
rs4551304810807559PINX1intronA/G0.4EA, HADBPCURD0.100.121.70 x 10−14373,915
rs4551304810807559PINX1intronA/G0.4EA, HAMAPCURD0.150.032.24 x 10−8373,911
rs9969436810985149XKR6intronT/G0.47AA, EAMAPLHD0.28-0.013.09 x 10−9165,894
rs2409784811539347BLKintronA/C0.51EA, HADBPCURD-0.11-0.095.62 x 10−12374,975
rs2244894811591150LINC00208C/G0.44ASA, EAPPCURD-0.07-0.193.24 x 10−15493,402
rs13249843811601509LINC00208T/G0.33EA, HADBPCURD0.180.042.51 x 10−15398,330
rs3735814811749887GATA4intronA/G0.52EA, HASBPCURD0.090.222.14 x 10−10373,919
rs99280941653765993FTOintronA/G0.63ASA, EAPPCURD-0.330.192.63 x 10−15499,179
rs620334061653790314FTOintronA/G0.55ASA, EAMAPCURD-0.220.123.31 x 10−8511,074

The most significantly associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role, in dbSNP build 150 (hg38) annotation; Role: Intronic or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no), LHD, Light(1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/week) drinker; Stage 1 and Stage 2, Combined Discovery and Replication; b_M, beta coefficient of SNV; b_I: SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect; P-Meta, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of Meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2; N, Number of individuals.

The most significantly associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38); Role: Intronic, Non-coding transcript (NCT) or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no), LHD, Light(1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/week) drinker; Stage 1, Discovery cohorts; Stage 2, Replication cohorts; S1 & S2,Combined Discovery and Replication; b_M, beta coefficient of SNV; b_I: SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect; P-Value: modified-interaction METAL P-Value; P-Meta, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of Meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2. The most significantly associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38); Role: Intronic, Non-coding transcript (NCT) or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no), LHD, Light(1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/week) drinker; Stage 1, Discovery cohorts; Stage 2, Replication cohorts; S1 & S2,Combined Discovery and Replication; b_M, beta coefficient of SNV; b_I: SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect; P-Value: modified-interaction METAL P-Value; P-Meta, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of Meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2. The most significantly associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38); Role: Intronic or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no), LHD, Light(1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/week) drinker; Stage 1, Discovery cohorts; Stage 2, Replication cohorts; S1 & S2,Combined Discovery and Replication; b_M, beta coefficient of SNV; b_I: SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect; P-Value: modified-interaction METAL P-Value; P-Meta, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of Meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 The most significantly associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role, in dbSNP build 150 (hg38) annotation; Role: Intronic or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no), LHD, Light(1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/week) drinker; Stage 1 and Stage 2, Combined Discovery and Replication; b_M, beta coefficient of SNV; b_I: SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect; P-Meta, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of Meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2; N, Number of individuals. Finally, we leveraged the added power of correlated meta-analysis[25, 26] for BP traits to detect additional variants. We performed correlated meta-analysis on P-values from METAL-meta-analysis[24] of DBP, SBP, MAP and PP traits separately for current drinkers and light/heavy drinkers in Stage 1 European ancestry cohorts. A variant was considered pleiotropic if the P- METAL-meta reached P ≤ 0.0001 in two or more BP traits and the correlated meta-analysis P-value was P ≤ 5.0 x 10−8[27]. We identified eight novel BP loci (11 genes, Table 5), the above five novel loci (14 genes, Tables 1 and 2), and the 22 previously reported BP loci (49 genes).
Table 5

Novel SNVs/Genes associated with BP traits from correlated meta-analysis in European ancestry in Stage 1.

Associations NOT Present in Tables 1 and 2, in Current Drinkers
SNVChrPositionGeneNear GeneRoleFrq1P-Correlated MetaP-DBPP-SBPP-MAPP-PPN
rs200124401183336112LOC107985037TTLL7intron0.704.29 x 10−81.82 x 10−51.86 x 10−61.20 x 10−64.68 x 10−489,035
rs38139631206648224DYRK3DYRK3, IL10Synon0.992.95 x 10−81.66 x 10−48.32 x 10−88.13 x 10−73.72 x 10−439,497
rs801692491206683281LOC105372875MAPKAPK20.993.52 x 10−82.45 x 10−47.41 x 10−81.00 x 10−63.39 x 10−439,497
rs1855973564161336738FSTL5FSTL50.991.77 x 10−87.24 x 10−78.71 x 10−74.37 x 10−81.00 x 10−255,056
rs777791421165832185SNX32SNX320.843.89 x 10−88.32 x 10−51.12 x 10−62.88 x 10−67.08 x 10−590,689
rs112273331165874946EFEMP2EFEMP20.802.34 x 10−83.24 x 10−55.89 x 10−71.15 x 10−62.00 x 10−486,262
rs2014070031165894964FOSL1FOSL1, MALAT1intron0.851.76 x 10−82.09 x 10−56.31 x 10−77.94 x 10−72.04 x 10−486,262
Associations Present in Tables 1 and 2, in Current Drinkers
SNVChrPositionGeneNear GeneRoleFrq1P-Correlated MetaP-DBPP-SBPP-MAPP-PPN
rs298075588506173LOC107986913SGK223 0.554.59 x 10−95.13 x 10−44.27 x 10−81.74 x 10−61.15 x 10−690,691
rs1327019488520592LOC105379224CLDN23 0.511.59 x 10−92.14 x 10−42.45 x 10−88.13 x 10−78.51 x 10−790,691
rs197667189822124TNKSTNKS 0.622.01 x 10−91.58 x 10−64.68 x 10−83.02 x 10−81.26 x 10−390,691
rs48391689936091MIR124-1MIR124-1 0.471.55 x 10−111.17 x 10−61.05 x 10−93.55 x 10−97.94 x 10−690,691
rs2062331810122482MSRAMSRAintron0.545.49 x 10−132.00 x 10−81.70 x 10−101.20 x 10−101.32 x 10−590,691
rs10096777810660990RP1L1RP1L1 0.447.58 x 10−99.77 x 10−51.91 x 10−79.55 x 10−71.51 x 10−590,691
rs7814795810661775MIR4286MIR4286 0.456.86 x 10−97.76 x 10−51.78 x 10−77.59 x 10−72.00 x 10−590,691
rs13276026810752445LOC102723313SOX7intron0.444.79 x 10−81.38 x 10−45.62 x 10−71.58 x 10−61.91 x 10−490,691
rs12156009811427710FAM167AFAM167Aintron0.519.49 x 10−91.82 x 10−41.66 x 10−71.32 x 10−61.07 x 10−590,691
rs1478894811591245LINC00208LINC00208 0.643.69 x 10−101.66 x 10−51.00 x 10−88.51 x 10−88.32 x 10−690,691
rs13280442811610048LOC105379242GATA4 0.455.23 x 10−91.86 x 10−48.32 x 10−81.29 x 10−64.47 x 10−690,691
rs99375211653765384FTOFTOintron0.612.89 x 10−108.13 x 10−54.68 x 10−96.46 x 10−72.04 x 10−790,691
Associations NOT Present in Tables 1 and 2, in Light / Heavy Drinkers
SNVChrPositionGeneNear GeneRoleFrq1P-Correlated MetaP-DBPP-SBPP-MAPP-PPN
rs1175198961543645473CATSPER2CATSPER2intron0.988.25 x 10−97.76 x 10−52.88 x 10−79.77 x 10−72.75 x 10−513,141
rs29573981753625691LOC107984982LOC107984982 0.291.11 x 10−88.91 x 10−51.23 x 10−72.69 x 10−63.80 x 10−554,785
rs1460913191871962177LOC102725148LOC102725148 0.991.50 x 10−81.26 x 10−31.74 x 10−83.39 x 10−61.26 x 10−526,187
rs1117001011911433340CCDC151CCDC151intron0.942.78 x 10−83.80 x 10−68.13 x 10−73.80 x 10−73.55 x 10−337,996
Associations Present in Tables 1 and 2, in Light / Heavy Drinkers
SNVChrPositionGeneNear GeneRoleFrq1P-Correlated MetaP-DBPP-SBPP-MAPP-PPN
rs3406299689802688TNKSTNKS 0.392.26 x 10−96.17 x 10−52.40 x 10−83.24 x 10−73.47 x 10−554,785
rs61563289938811MIR124-1MIR124-1 0.474.18 x 10−101.78 x 10−57.41 x 10−98.13 x 10−82.34 x 10−554,785
rs7843924810119030MSRAMSRAintron0.542.46 x 10−131.38 x 10−81.58 x 10−101.58 x 10−106.46 x 10−654,785
rs11250099810961147XKR6XKR6intron0.484.13 x 10−81.82 x 10−43.98 x 10−72.19 x 10−61.62 x 10−454,785
rs13255193811451683FAM167AFAM167Aintron0.462.41 x 10−87.76 x 10−56.76 x 10−71.66 x 10−69.77 x 10−554,785
rs4841559811559376BLKBLKintron0.514.12 x 10−84.79 x 10−44.47 x 10−79.55 x 10−61.35 x 10−554,785
rs4840573811605721LINC00208LINC00208 0.603.94 x 10−91.15 x 10−37.76 x 10−87.59 x 10−64.57 x 10−853,371
rs13280442811610048LOC105379242GATA4 0.456.26 x 10−92.40 x 10−41.38 x 10−73.39 x 10−62.24 x 10−654,785

The most significantly associated SNVs are shown per gene for correlated BP traits and alcohol status: Current drinker (yes/no), and Light (1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/ week) drinker. The “NOT Present in Tables 1 and 2” represents the associations detected using correlated meta-approach, otherwise the associations were already presented in Tables 1 and 2 using modified-interaction METAL approach. Abbreviations: SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38); Role: Intronic, synonymous codon (Synon), or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; P-Correlated Meta, P-Value of BP-correlated meta-analysis; P-DBP, modified-interaction METAL P-Value for Diastolic BP; P-SBP, modified-interaction METAL P-Value for Systolic BP; P-MAP, modified-interaction METAL P-Value for Mean Arterial Pressure; P-PP, modified-interaction METAL P-Value for Pulse Pressure; N, Number of individuals.

The most significantly associated SNVs are shown per gene for correlated BP traits and alcohol status: Current drinker (yes/no), and Light (1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/ week) drinker. The “NOT Present in Tables 1 and 2” represents the associations detected using correlated meta-approach, otherwise the associations were already presented in Tables 1 and 2 using modified-interaction METAL approach. Abbreviations: SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38); Role: Intronic, synonymous codon (Synon), or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; P-Correlated Meta, P-Value of BP-correlated meta-analysis; P-DBP, modified-interaction METAL P-Value for Diastolic BP; P-SBP, modified-interaction METAL P-Value for Systolic BP; P-MAP, modified-interaction METAL P-Value for Mean Arterial Pressure; P-PP, modified-interaction METAL P-Value for Pulse Pressure; N, Number of individuals.

Gene transcription regulation

HaploReg[28, 29], RegulomeDB[30, 31], GTEx[32], GWAS3D[33], and GRASP[34] provided evidence that several SNVs on 8p23.1 have regulatory features (S13 and S14 Tables). From the analyses with GTEx, a total of 227 (56 novel and 171 BP-known S14 Tables) SNVs had tissue specific eQTL results. Seven out of 56 novel SNVs were associated with eQTLs that have expression in brain, thyroid, and/or blood. From 171 BP-known SNVs, 44 were significantly associated with eQTLs with expression in adipose, artery, esophagus, lung, pancreas, thyroid and/or fibroblasts. In addition, GWAS3D analyses suggested trans-regulation features for our BP candidate SNVs. It identified 215 SNVs with long-range interactions.

BP genes show enrichment for alcohol and cardiovascular disease

We used GeneGO[35] and Literature Lab[36] to perform enrichment analyses for the full set of novel and reported (179 BP candidate) genes identified from our analyses. Literature Lab, based on 106,967 abstracts for “Drinking” Physiology from MeSH (Medical Subject Headings), identified enrichment (P < 0.00001) related to ALDH2 (known to be associated with alcohol dependence)[15] and several other genes, including our novel finding for ERCC6, CATSPER2, GABRB1 and GATA4. The main contributor for “Angiotensin II” (P < 0.00001) was AGT and ACE for “Hypertension” (P = 0.0002). AGT and ACE are part of Renin-Angiotensin System pathway (KEGG, map04614), involved in BP homeostasis, fluid-electrolyte balance, and essential hypertension[37, 38]. Our results were significantly enriched for cardiovascular disease-related biological functions. For example, “Cardiovascular Diseases” (P = 0.0034) enriched with genes AGT, NPPA, ACE, NOS3, ADRB1, MTHFR, FBN1 and GATA4. “Heart Failure” (P = 0.0003) and “Cardiomegaly” (P = 0.0003); from Pathological Conditions: “Hypertrophy” (P = 0.0001); from Anatomy MeSH: “Heart” (P = 0.0001), “Cardiovascular System” (P = 0.0002) and “Aorta” (P = 0.0002); and from domain Tissue Type MeSH: “Myocardium” (P = 0.0008) enriched with NPPA, GATA4, AGT, ADRB1, NOS3, ACE and KCNJ11. GeneGO identified an additional term “Cardiac Arrhythmias” (P-FDR = 3.2 x 10−20).

Protein-protein interactions and pathways enriched for BP genes

The protein-protein interactions (PPI) analyses showed that several novel gene proteins are important hubs in interaction with many other proteins. For example, MAPKAPK2 (1q32.1, Table 5) interacts among others with BAG2, LISP1 and ELAVL1. ELAVL1 interacts also with novel XKR6 from 8p23.1 (S16 Fig). Of the novel genes GRK5, MAPKAPK2, BLK, EFEMP2 and ERCC6 ranked the highest in protein-protein interconnectivity (degree), while MAPKAPK2, PINX1, EFEMP2, FAM167A and GRK5 were ranked the highest for important interconnections based on PageRank algorithm. Further, we entered the gene labels of the combined PPI network into the GeneGo software and found enrichment for Cytoskeleton Remodeling/TGF/ Wnt (P-FDR = 1.7 x 10−17), among other pathways.

Discussion

This is the first large-scale study to systematically evaluate the role of joint effect of main gene and gene-alcohol interaction on BP in a very large meta-analysis across multiple ancestries.

BP genes interacting with alcohol show association with alcohol metabolism or dependence

The 8p23.1 containing novel BP associations spans ~3.3 Mb from LOC107986913-SGK223 (8,452,998 bp) to GATA4 (11,752,486 bp) (Tables 1 and 2). Chromosome 8p23.1 is a complex region of deletions and replications, with repeated inverse structures[39, 40]. We identified four LD blocks in 8p23.1 (Fig 1). The significant GWAS results on 8p23.1 are from European ancestry participants in Stage 1, Stage 2 follow up, and combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analyses. For this region, the evidence of genetic associations was identified from all four BP traits at both current drinking and light/heavy drinking status (Tables 1 and 2). The association on 8p23.1 found in the large European ancestry sample may also occur in other ancestries. The genome-wide significance levels in meta-analysis of European ancestry combined with African (5 genes), Asian (2 genes), and/or Hispanic (9 genes) ancestries have shown small improvements in their P-values compared to European ancestry meta-analysis alone (Tables 4 and S9). For some of these associated SNVs on 8p23.1, the allele frequencies in European ancestry are higher than in African ancestry (e.g., rs4841294: 0.44 versus 0.25, respectively), and Hispanic Ancestry (e.g., rs34919878: 0.42 versus 0.25, respectively). These findings suggest the presence of cross-population association patterns between European, African, and Hispanic ancestries, although they are not genome-wide significant in African and Hispanic ancestries presumably because of small sample sizes.
Fig 1

Identification of four independent LD blocks in the 8p23.1 region (~3.3 MBs).

Several of the genes residing on 8p23.1 have been reported for alcohol metabolism and/or dependence. Overexpression of PINX1 was reported to be associated with alcohol-related cirrhosis and fibrosis[41]. The transcription factor GATA4 has been reported to be associated with alcohol dependence in several studies[42-45]. GATA4 was suggested to regulate atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP, officially known as NPPA) modulating the amygdala’s response to alcohol dependence[39] and is associated with BP[46]. In addition, a suggestive GWAS finding was observed between a variant near BLK-LINC00208 with alcohol dependence[47]. The S2 Note provides a comprehensive summary of novel and neighboring genes and their potential biological relevance. FTO (16q12.2) variants in interaction with alcohol consumption were significant for BP in European ancestry (Table 2) and in combined meta-analysis of European and Asian ancestries (Table 4). FTO is involved in the regulation of thermogenesis and the control of adipocyte differentiation into brown or white fat cells[48]. FTO variants have been associated in diverse ancestries with obesity-related traits[49, 50], as well as alcohol consumption and alcohol dependency[51, 52]. Frequency of alcohol consumption was suggested to modify the effect of FTO variants on body mass index[53]. IL10 (interleukin 10, ~49 Kb upstream of rs3813963, Table 5) has been associated with hypertension[54] and with alcoholic cirrhosis[55]. MALAT1 (ncRNA, ~390 Kb upstream of rs201407003) is upregulated in the cerebellum, hippocampus and brain stem of alcoholics[56], which may represent an important mechanism for alcohol actions in the central nervous system. It is worth to note that the allele frequencies for several potential SNVs in African ancestry (Table 3) are low (<0.10) but they are monomorphic in Europeans, which may suggest African-specific associations. Even though we did not have true replications for African ancestry associations (some of them due to missing SNVs or very low sample size in Stage 2), the identified candidate loci include genes previously related to alcohol consumption and dependence (Table 3). GABRB1[57] (4p12) and GABBR2[58] (9q22.33, 143 kb upstream of rs73655199) are major neurotransmitters in the vertebrate brain, representing ligand-gated ion channels and have been shown to associate with alcohol dependence. EYS (6q12) displayed association with alcohol dependence in multi-ancestry population studies for rare[59] and common[60] variants. LINGO2 (9p21.1) was reported to be associated with age at onset of alcohol dependence in the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism[16]. ERCC6 (10q11.23) participates in DNA repair in response to oxidative stress[61]. Carriers of Arg1230Pro at ERCC6 had a decreased risk for laryngeal cancer, strongest in heavy smokers and high alcohol consumers[62]. CHAT (10q11.23, 136 kb downstream of rs4253197) encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the biosynthesis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, and binge ethanol in adolescents was reported to decrease CHAT expression[63]. BAG3 (10q26.11, 183 Kb downstream of rs201383951) was also suggested to contribute to alcohol-induced neurodegenerations[64]. A mouse study suggested that BAG3 exerts a vaso-relaxing effect through the activation of the PI3K/Akt/eNOS signaling pathway, and may influence BP regulation[64]. A GWAS identified association of BAG3 with dilated cardiomyopathy[65], and suggestive association with alcohol dependence[44]. SGK1 (409 kb upstream of rs76987554) is associated with increased BP[66] and may contribute to the mechanisms underlying behavioral response to chronic ethanol exposure[67]. In addition, our two potential genes by alcohol interaction, TARID (rs76987554) and CDH17 (rs115888294), have been recently reported association with BP in African ancestry, which supports our findings[68].

Regulatory features of BP genes

Analysis of our significant BP variants for cis- transcription regulation via HaploReg[29] (S13 Table) showed that in total about 11% of variants were localized in promoter histone marks, 55% in enhancer histone marks, 34% at DNAse hypersensitive sites, 10% located at protein regulatory binding sites, and 88% were predicted to change regulatory protein binding motifs. These feature findings are inflated, because several variants are in LD blocks. Several of our variants had P-values ≤ 5.0 x 10−8 for being eQTLs for one or more target genes. The rs2921053 is the best eSNV regulating the transcription of SGK223 in thyroid tissue (P-value = 1.04 x 10−67). Thyroid hormones are known to affect BP, heart and cardiovascular system[69].

Pathways enriched for BP genes

Our findings, TNKS (Table 1), FSTL5 and MAPKAPK2 (Table 5) and many other genes from PPI networks (S17 Fig), are part of Wnt/beta-catenin[70] signaling pathway. The TNKS forms a complex for degrading β-catenin (CTNNB1)[70] in interaction with AXIN1, AXIN2, and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) (S17 and S18 Figs). The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway is known to be involved in renal injury and fibrosis induced by hypertension[71]. In addition, TNKS is involved in the regulation of GLUT4 trafficking in adipocytes[72]. Other findings from correlated meta-analysis also contributed to pathways. For example, rs206648224 is intronic to DYRK3, 37 Kb upstream of MAPKAPK2, and 119 Kb downstream of IL10. MAPKAPK2 is a stress-activated serine/threonine-protein kinase involved in cytokine production especially for TNF and IL6, and phosphorylates among others LSP1, already identified in association with BP[9]. MAPKAPK2[73] augments and FSTL5[74] diminishes the expression of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Limitations

Despite large sample sizes in Stages 1 and 2 (≈131K individuals and ≈440K individuals, respectively), our novel variants (8p23 and 16q12) are common in their allele frequencies. For an analysis of gene by alcohol interactions in BP, even larger sample sizes are required to have sufficient power for detecting (and replicating) variants with lower allele frequency in the genome. Our findings were based on a joint test of the main and interaction effects, which limits our ability to statistically differentiate the effect of interaction from the main effect. However, there is evidence that several of our novel and previously reported findings suggest association with alcohol consumption and dependency. For African ancestry, the findings were not replicated, due to low sample size in Stage 2 (≈3K individuals) versus Stage 1 (≈21K individuals) and because seven potential variants for African ancestry were not available in Stage 2. There are fewer associations of SNVs interacting with light/heavy drinkers compared to current drinkers, which is probably due to the reduced sample size in light/heavy drinkers. We also found an association in light/heavy drinkers which is not present in current drinkers. The LOC105374235 gene interacts with light/heavy drinkers for SBP but does not interact with current drinkers for SBP in African ancestry (Table 3 and S10 Fig). These findings suggest that novel loci for BP can be expected to be discovered when increasing the sample size for light/heavy drinkers. The two Brazilian cohorts (from discovery only) were included in the multi-ancestry meta-analyses. However, their association results did not contribute to SNV-alcohol interactions for BP traits, which could be in part to the relative small sample size (4,415 subjects) affecting the power of associations in the joint gene-environmental interaction model.

Conclusion

We identified and replicated five novel loci (380 SNVs in 21 genes) via joint test of main genetic effect and gene-alcohol interaction, and eight novel loci (11 genes) using correlated meta-analysis in European ancestry. We also found 18 potentially novel BP loci in discovery (P ≤ 5.0 x 10−8) in gene-alcohol interaction model in African ancestry participants, but without replication. In addition, we identified 49 loci previously reported for BP (2,159 SNVs in 109 genes) using the joint test for interaction in European and multi-ancestries meta-analyses. Several of these SNVs/genes are related to alcohol metabolism and dependence, have evidence for regulatory features, and are enriched in pathways for cardiovascular disease, hypertension and blood pressure homeostasis. Our findings provide novel insights into mechanisms of BP regulation and may highlight new therapeutic targets.

Methods

Individuals between the ages of 18–80, who participated in the studies, provided written informed consent and approval by their research ethics committees and/or institutional review boards. The description of each participating study cohort is shown in S1 Note.

Phenotypes, alcohol consumption, and study cohorts

SBP (in mmHg) and diastolic BP (DBP in mmHg) were measured at resting or sitting positions by averaging up to three BP readings at the same clinical visit. To account for the reduction in BP levels due to anti-hypertensive medication use, the BP levels were adjusted by adding 15 mm Hg to SBP and 10 mm Hg to DBP values. After adjustment, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was defined as the sum of two-thirds of DBP and one-third of SBP, and pulse pressure (PP) was estimated as the difference between SBP and DBP. Hypertension was defined whether participants presented: (i) SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg, (ii) DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg, and/or (iii) taking anti-hypertensive medication. For quality control (QC), SE-N (i.e., inverse of the median standard error versus the square root of the sample size) plots were produced[75]. If cohort-specific analytical problems existed, they were corrected. Definition of “a dose or a drink” is about 17.7 grams of ethanol, which is the amount of a typical beverage of 12 oz. (354.882 ml) bottle or can of beer, a 5 oz. (147.868 ml) glass of wine, or a standard 1.5 oz. (44.3603 ml) shot of 80-proof spirits, such as gin, vodka, or whiskey[76]. Alcohol consumption was defined by two categories: (I) as current drinking (yes/no), and (II) in the subset of drinkers, as light/heavy drinking (1–7 drinks/week or ≥8 drinks/week).

Genotyping

Genotyping was performed using Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) or Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA, USA) arrays. 1000 Genomes Imputation was implemented using MACH and Minimac, IMPUTE2, and/or BEAGLE software, based on the cosmopolitan panel from Phase I Integrated Release Version 3 Haplotypes (2010–11 data freeze, 2012-03-14 haplotypes). Dosages from 1000 Genomes were used in 106 cohorts out of 115 Stage 1 and Stage 2 cohorts. If 1000 Genomes were not available in a cohort, dosages based on HapMap Phase II / III reference panel (2 Stage 1 cohorts and 4 Stage 2 cohorts) or genotyped data (3 Stage 2 cohorts) were used in the analyses. Information of study characteristics, genotyping, imputation, covariates, and analyses are summarized for Stage 1 in S1–S4 Tables, and for Stage 2 in S5–S8 Tables.

Interaction association analysis

Each Stage 1 and Stage 2 cohort conducted a joint statistical model analysis[24]: where SNV is the dosage of the genetic (G) variant, E is the alcohol consumption (current drinker or light/heavy drinker) effect, SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect, b values are the respective beta coefficients from regression analysis and C represents covariates (age, sex, principal components (PCs), and other study-specific covariates). The joint model provides estimates of b and b, robust estimates of the corresponding standard errors (SEs) and covariance, and P-values from the joint 2 degree-of-freedom Wald test. The SNV effect (b) is context-dependent and thus should not be interpreted as the “main effect”[23]. Principal components were derived from genotyped SNVs and used for controlling population stratification and genomic confounding effects. Each cohort decided the number of PCs to be included in the joint statistical model analysis, as shown in S4 Table (Discovery, in Stage 1) and S8 Table (Replication, in Stage 2). Particularly for African ancestry, it was required to include at the least the first PC and additional PCs as appropriate. The association analyses were implemented by programming in R or using ProbABEL[77] for studies of unrelated individuals, or by GenABEL/MixABEL[78] or MMAP (O’Connell, unpublished; personal communication), which account for family relatedness.

Meta-analysis and quality control

We employed a modified METAL software[24] to perform 2 degrees of freedom joint meta-analysis, using the inverse-variance weighted fixed-effects approach. We applied multiple steps of QC, both at cohort association analysis and at meta-analysis level, implemented with EasyQC, an R package[75]. They included filtering of markers with imputation quality < 0.5; with minor allele frequency < 1%; minor allele count ≤ 10; if alleles were mismatched when comparing the cohort’s alleles with the 1000 Genomes cosmopolitan panel; and/or if the allele frequencies were different from those of the 1000 Genomes. In addition, a cohort participated in the meta-analysis if it had more than 50 individuals consuming alcohol. The meta-analysis results were reported if they had more than 5,000 individuals and if at least two studies for each SNV contributed to the analysis. Markers with meta-heterogeneity P < 1.0 x 10−6 were dropped. We used (double) study- and meta- level genomic control corrections to account for population stratification accumulated across studies or due to unaccounted relatedness. Distributions of–log10 P-values of observed versus–log10 P-values expected (QQ plots) are shown in S2 and S3 Figs.

Correlated meta-analysis

The genome (millions of SNPs) are under the null hypothesis of no genotype-phenotype association, which is only mildly contaminated with a relatively smaller set of SNVs that are under the alternative. The correlated meta-analysis[25, 26] performs a large sampling of genome and produces the polychoric correlation estimator (using SAS PROC FREQ). The estimator measures the relation degree of any non-independence between scans. The correlated meta-analysis corrects the inference for it, retaining the proper type I error structure. The correlated meta-analysis[25, 26] uses the Fisher’s 1925 method by combining P-values at each location of the genome. This technique uses the fact that for number of scans, sum of −2 ln (p), approximately chi-square (X2) with two degrees of freedom. In the case of correlated GWAS, this sum is no longer distributed as a simple X2. Instead, the correlated meta-analysis method[25, 26] uses an inverse-normal transform, Zi = θ−1 (p) forming the N dimensional vector Z of all Zi s. Then, the method applies the basic theorem of multidimensional statistics for the matrix D, if Z~N(O, E) then DZ~N(O, E∑D’). In particular, when D is a 1×N vector of all 1’s, SUM(Z) = D Z ~ N(0, SUM(∑)), whose tail probability gives the Z meta-analysis P-value. In this case, for estimating ∑, the SNV P-values are dichotomized across the genome as (P ≤ 0.5; P > 0.5). The software was developed in SAS.

Bioinformatics analyses

The annotation of variants was sourced from NCBI dbSNP build 138 (hg19) during the analyses and updated to dbSNP build 150 (hg38) for reporting results. Our candidate SNVs for BP were questioned if they resided in any of regulatory marks, analyzing information from the NCBI Entrez gene, dbSNP, Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Consortium (ENCODE) project and the Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium (ROADMAP), as summarized by HaploReg[28, 29], and RegulomeDB[30, 31]. HaploReg (v.4.1) queries were used to identify functional annotations including the chromatin state segmentation on the Roadmap reference epigenomes, conserved regions by GERP and SiPhy, the experiments of DNAse hypersensitivity and ChIP-seq experiments from ENCODE. UCSC Genome Browser and GENCODE were used for gene annotations. We calculated the proximity of each variant to a gene. RegulomeDB (v. 1.1, accessed on 06.15.2017) provided regulatory information of gene expression via ChIP factors, DNase sensitivity, and transcription factor (TF) binding sites from ENCODE. RegulomeDB uses the Position-Weight Matrix for TF binding, and databases JASPAR CORE, TRANSFAC and UniPROBE[79]. RegulomeDB reported Chromatin States from ROADMAP, eQTLs from several tissue types, DNase footprinting[80, 81], differentially methylated regions[82], manually curated regions and validated functional SNVs. GWAS3D[33] (accessed on 03.15.2017) was used to analyze genetic variants that may affect regulatory elements, by integrating annotations from cell type-specific chromatin states, epigenetic modifications, sequence motifs and cross-species conservation. The regulatory elements are inferred from the genome-wide chromosome interaction data, chromatin marks in different cell types measured by high-throughput chromosome conformation capture technologies (5C, ChIA-PET and Hi-C) from ENCODE, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, published resources and regulatory factor motifs. We gathered also evidence for eQTLs based on GTEx (v. 7), GRASP software and special gene expression reported results[83, 84]. The importance of our novel and potential novel BP genes (Tables 1–5) were mined by means of four methods: enrichment analysis, protein- protein interactions (PPI), analytical gene expression cis-regulation, and analytical gene expression trans-regulation. The GeneGO and Literature Lab of ACUMENTA software (accessed on 03.15. 2017) were used for enrichment analysis. We tested if novel genes were significantly enriched among pre-specified gene sets defined in pathways, or by shared roles in particular diseases or biological processes from Gene Ontology. The GeneGO enrichment analysis consists of matching unique gene symbols of possible targets for the "common", "similar" and "unique" sets with gene symbols in functional ontologies. The probability of a random intersection between a set of gene symbols, the size of target list with ontology entities, is estimated by P-value of a hypergeometric intersection. The lower P-value means higher relevance of the entity to the dataset, which shows in higher rating for the entity. Literature Lab is an interface between experimentally-derived gene lists and scientific literature in a curated vocabulary of 24,000 biological and biochemical terms. It employs statistical and clustering analysis on over 17.5 million PubMed abstracts (from 01.01.1990 to the present) to identify pathways (809 pathways), diseases, compounds, cell biology and other areas of biology and biochemistry. The analysis engine compares statistically the submitted gene set to 1,000 random gene sets generated in the analysis to identify term relationships that are associated with the gene set more than by chance alone. The BP candidate genes were assessed via PPI of databases from Biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets (BioGrid), Escherichia coli K-12 (EcoCyc), and Human Protein Database (HPRD) as summarized by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, accessed on 02.28.2017). The gene list from PPI was evaluated using igraph package[85]. The network was built using our programs in SAS, to a Pajek format and imported into igraph in R language. “Google” PageRank algorithm provided the importance of genes (website pages) in a network, which was implemented by igraph. Information of data analysis tools and databases, including their website links (when available) and the corresponding literature citations, are provided in S15 Table.

Description of participating studies.

Study descriptions of discovery cohorts (Stage 1) and replication cohorts (Stage 2). (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Summary of biological description for novel BP loci.

Information summary of the nearest genes for blood pressure novel loci. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Study design of SNV x alcohol interactions for BP.

Schematic study design of the joint model of SNV main effect and SNV-alcohol consumption interaction; Blood pressure (BP) traits: systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP); Alcohol consumption was defined by two categories: (I) as current drinking (yes/no), and (II), in the subset of drinkers, as light/heavy drinking (1–7 drinks/week or ≥8 drinks/week); Meta-analysis using a modified version of METAL: Stage 1 (discovery), Stage 2 (replication) and combined Stage 1 and Stage 2; Cohorts: European ancestry (EA), African ancestry, Asian ancestry (ASA), Hispanic ancestry (HA), Brazilian (BRA); Correlated meta-analysis in EA for four BP traits; Number of BP loci (genes), novel and reported. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

QQ plots for BP traits for current drinkers.

Meta-analysis distributions of–log10 P-values of observed versus–log10 P-values expected (QQ plots) for current drinkers (yes/no) European ancestry (A) and in African ancestry (B). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

QQ plots for BP traits for light/heavy drinkers.

Meta-analysis distributions of–log10 P-values of observed versus–log10 P-values expected (QQ plots) for light/heavy drinkers (1–7 drinks/week or ≥8 drinks/week) in European ancestry (A) and in African ancestry (B). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Regional association plots on 8p23.

SNV x current drinker interaction for SBP (A), DBP (B), MAP (C) and PP (D) in European Ancestry; four linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks (see also Fig 1). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Regional association plots on 16q12.

SNV x current drinker interaction for SBP (A), DBP (B), MAP (C) and PP (D) in European Ancestry. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Manhattan plots of combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis for SBP in current drinkers (A) and in light/heavy drinkers (B) in European ancestry. Novel loci are highlighted in blue. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Manhattan plots of combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis for DBP in current drinkers (A) and in light/heavy drinkers (B) in European ancestry. Novel loci are highlighted in blue. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Manhattan plots of combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis for MAP in current drinkers (A) and in light/heavy drinkers (B) in European ancestry. Novel loci are highlighted in blue. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Manhattan plots of combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis for PP in current drinkers (A) and in light/heavy drinkers (B) in European ancestry. Novel loci are highlighted in blue. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Manhattan plots of combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis for SBP in current drinkers (A) and in light/heavy drinkers (B) in African ancestry. Novel loci are highlighted in blue. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Manhattan plots of combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis for DBP in current drinkers (A) and in light/heavy drinkers (B) in African ancestry. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Manhattan plots of combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis for MAP in current drinkers (A) and in light/heavy drinkers (B) in African ancestry. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Manhattan plots of combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis for PP in current drinkers (A) and in light/heavy drinkers (B) in African ancestry. Novel loci are highlighted in blue. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Manhattan plots of combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis for SBP (A) and DBP (B) in current drinkers in Asian ancestry. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Manhattan plots of combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis for MAP (A) and PP (B) in current drinkers in Asian ancestry. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Protein-protein interactions network.

In the figure, ellipses in black represent all novel genes; ellipses in red represent novel from EA; squares in blue represent potential novel findings from African ancestry; and triangles in black from correlated-meta. Labeled with A and B free-hand circles are proteins that have two connections, while labeled within C are proteins that have three-five connections with our findings. APP interacts with five of our BP candidate novel genes TTLL7, SOX7, PINX1, LINGO2 and KCNMB2 (circle C). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Protein-protein interactions between tankyrase and beta-catenin.

Tankyrase (from TNKS gene) and β-catenin (from CTNNB1 gene). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Wnt signaling KEGG pathway.

TNKS interacts with CTNNB1. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Descriptive analyses for discovery data (Stage 1) in current drinkers.

Characteristics of blood pressure (BP) in current drinkers (yes or no), within sub-sample of individuals with or without anti-hypertensive (BP Lowering) medications, and in combined samples; SBP, systolic BP; DBP, diastolic BP; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PP, pulse pressure; N, number of individuals; mean, mean levels; SD, standard deviation of mean; Min, minimum value; Max, maximum value; For each BP trait (SBP, DBP, MAP, and PP), the extreme BP values were winsorised if a BP value was greater than 6 SD, above or below the mean, setting the BP value exactly at 6 SDs from the mean. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Descriptive analyses for discovery data (Stage 1) in light/heavy drinkers.

Characteristics of blood pressure (BP) in light/heavy drinkers (1–7 drinks/week or ≥8 drinks/week), within sub-sample of individuals with or without anti-hypertensive (BP Lowering) medications, and in combined samples; SBP, systolic BP; DBP, diastolic BP; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PP, pulse pressure; N, number of individuals; mean, mean levels; SD, standard deviation of mean; Min, minimum value; Max, maximum value; For each BP trait (SBP, DBP, MAP, and PP), the extreme BP values were winsorised if a BP value was greater than 6 SD, above or below the mean, setting the BP value exactly at 6 SDs from the mean. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Descriptive analyses for blood pressure (BP) stratified by alcohol consumption for discovery data (Stage 1).

Characteristics of systolic BP and diastolic BP, after correcting for BP lowering medication and winsorizing observations. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Characteristics of each study and their genotype data for discovery data (Stage 1).

Study design, population-based or cohort-unrelated; Principal components used; Other covariates entered in the model; Genotyping platforms; Genotyping calling algorithm; Quality Control Filters; Imputation reference panel; Number of SNVs (single nucleotide variants). (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Descriptive analyses for replication data (Stage 2) in current drinkers.

Characteristics of blood pressure (BP) within current drinkers (CURD: yes or no), and in alcohol combined samples; SBP, systolic BP; DBP, diastolic BP; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PP, pulse pressure; N, number of individuals; mean, mean levels; SD, standard deviation of mean; Min, minimum value; Max, maximum value. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Descriptive analyses for replication data (Stage 2) in light/heavy drinkers.

Characteristics of blood pressure (BP) within light/heavy drinkers (LHD: 1–7 drinks/week or ≥8 drinks/week), and in alcohol combined samples; SBP, systolic BP; DBP, diastolic BP; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PP, pulse pressure; N, number of individuals; mean, mean levels; SD, standard deviation of mean; Min, minimum value; Max, maximum value. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Demographic statistics for replication data (Stage 2).

N, Number of subjects; % Hypertensive, defined whether participants presented: (i) SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg, (ii) DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg, and/or (iii) taking anti-hypertensive medication; Mean, age mean; SD, standard deviation of mean; Min, minimum age; Max, maximum age. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Characteristics of each study and their genotype data for replication data (Stage 2).

Study design, population-based or cohort-unrelated; Principal components used; Other covariates entered in the model; Genotyping platforms; Genotyping calling algorithm; Imputation reference panel; NCBI dbSNP build; Analysis software; Robust or model-based statistics; Family studies: Method of handling relatedness. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Novel SNVs/ genes associated with BP traits in multi-ancestry and specific-ancestry meta-combined results.

Top significant associated SNVs are shown per gene for each trait and alcohol exposure. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

SNVs/genes associated with BP traits in European ancestry.

Variants previously reported for blood pressure (BP) in genome-wide association studies. The most significant associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: Nb, order number based on genes; SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38) annotation; Role: Intronic, missense, up-stream or downstream, or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no), LHD, Light(1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/week) drinker; Stage 1, Discovery cohorts; Stage 2, Replication cohorts; Stage 1 & Stage 2, Discovery and Replication combined; b_M(S.E.), beta coefficient of SNV (standard error); b_I(S.E.): SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect (standard error); P-Value: modified-interaction METAL P-Value; N, Number of subjects; P-Meta, P-Meta, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of Meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2; Het-P value, Heterogeneity P-Value. * These genes were detected also via correlated meta-analysis. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

SNVs/genes associated with BP traits in African ancestry.

Variants previously reported for blood pressure (BP) in genome-wide association studies. The most significant associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: Nb, order number based on genes; SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38) annotation; Role: Intronic or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no); Stage 1, Discovery cohorts; Stage 2, Replication cohorts; Stage 1 & Stage 2, Discovery and Replication combined; b_M(S.E.), beta coefficient of SNV (standard error); b_I(S.E.): SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect (standard error); P-Value: modified-interaction METAL P-Value; N, Number of subjects; P-Meta, P-Meta, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of Meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2; Het-P value, Heterogeneity P-Value. * These genes were detected also via correlated meta-analysis. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

SNVs/genes associated with BP traits in multi-ancestry meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2.

Variants previously reported for blood pressure (BP) in genome-wide association studies. The most significant associated SNVs are shown per gene for each Blood Pressure (BP) trait and alcohol status. Abbreviations: Nb, order number based on genes; SNV, single nucleotide variant; Chr, chromosome; Position, Gene, and Role in dbSNP build 150 (hg38) annotation; Role: Intronic, missense, up-stream or downstream, or intergenic (blank space) SNV; Near gene reflects genes at up to +/-500 kb and related to BP / alcohol; A1/2, Coded and non-coded alleles; Frq1, Frequency of coded allele; Ancestry, EA: European Ancestry, AA: African American Ancestry, ASA: Asian American Ancestry, HA: Hispanic Ancestry; Trait, SBP: Systolic BP, DBP: Diastolic BP, MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure, PP: Pulse Pressure; Drink: Alcohol consumption, CURD, Current drinker (yes/no), LHD, Light(1–7 drinks/week) or heavy (≥8 drinks/week) drinker; Stage 1 and Stage 2, Combined Discovery and Replication; b_M, beta coefficient of SNV; b_I: SNV*E is SNV-alcohol interaction effect; P-Value, modified-interaction METAL P-Value of meta-analysis in combined Stage 1 and Stage 2; N, Number of subjects; Het-P value, Heterogeneity P-Value. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

SNVs/genes associated with BP traits for regulatory features using HaploReg and RegulomeDB.

Association findings from European Ancestry (novel), African Ancestry (potential) and correlated meta-analysis (novel variants). The annotation of variants was sourced from NCBI dbSNP build 138 (hg19) during the analyses and updated to dbSNP build 150 (hg38) for reporting results. Abbreviations: Nb, order number based on SNVs; Position, dbSNP build 150 (hg38) annotation; Variant, single nucleotide variant (SNV); Ref, reference allele; Alt, alternative allele; AFR Freq, Freq of Ref in African ancestry; ASN Freq, Freq of Ref in East Asian ancestry; EUR Freq, Freq of Ref in European ancestry; GERP cons and Siphy cons, measured conserved regions. RegulomeDB scoring has classes defined as 1b, 1d and 1f: likely to affect binding and linked to expression of a gene target, with details: 1b (eQTL + TF binding + any motif + DNase footprint + DNase peak); 1d (eQTL + TF binding + any motif + DNase peak); 1f (eQTL + TF binding/DNase peak), 2a and 2b: likely to affect binding, 3a: less likely to affect binding, 4, 5, and 6: minimal binding evidence, and 7: no data. This software was accessed on 06.15.2017. Regulatory function measured by Promoter histone marks, Enhancer histone marks, DNase (DNAse hypersensitivity), Proteins bound, Motifs changed. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Novel SNVs/genes associated with BP traits for eSNV/eQTL using GTEx.

Target genes (Tissues and P-Values). Association findings from European Ancestry (novel) and correlated meta-analysis (novel variants). The annotation of variants was sourced from NCBI dbSNP build 138 (hg19) during the analyses and updated to dbSNP build 150 (hg38) for reporting results. Abbreviations: Nb, order number based on SNVs; Position, dbSNP build 150 (hg38) annotation; Variant, single nucleotide variant (SNV); Ref, reference allele; Alt, alternative allele; AFR Freq, Freq of Ref in African ancestry; ASN Freq, Freq of Ref in East Asian ancestry; EUR Freq, Freq of Ref in European ancestry. * RegulomeDB scoring has classes defined as 1b, 1d and 1f: likely to affect binding and linked to expression of a gene target, with details: 1b (eQTL + TF binding + any motif + DNase footprint + DNase peak); 1d (eQTL + TF binding + any motif + DNase peak); 1f (eQTL + TF binding/DNase peak), 2a and 2b: likely to affect binding, 3a: less likely to affect binding, 4, 5, and 6: minimal binding evidence, and 7: no data. This software was accessed on 06.15.2017. Regulatory function measured by Promoter histone marks, Enhancer histone marks, DNase (DNAse hypersensitivity), Proteins bound, Motifs changed. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Data analysis tools and databases.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  84 in total

1.  GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis.

Authors:  Yurii S Aulchenko; Stephan Ripke; Aaron Isaacs; Cornelia M van Duijn
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Multiancestry Study of Gene-Lifestyle Interactions for Cardiovascular Traits in 610 475 Individuals From 124 Cohorts: Design and Rationale.

Authors:  D C Rao; Yun J Sung; Thomas W Winkler; Karen Schwander; Ingrid Borecki; L Adrienne Cupples; W James Gauderman; Kenneth Rice; Patricia B Munroe; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2017-06

Review 3.  The angiotensin-converting enzyme gene family: genomics and pharmacology.

Authors:  Anthony J Turner; Nigel M Hooper
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  FTO Obesity Variant Circuitry and Adipocyte Browning in Humans.

Authors:  Melina Claussnitzer; Simon N Dankel; Kyoung-Han Kim; Gerald Quon; Wouter Meuleman; Christine Haugen; Viktoria Glunk; Isabel S Sousa; Jacqueline L Beaudry; Vijitha Puviindran; Nezar A Abdennur; Jannel Liu; Per-Arne Svensson; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Daniel J Drucker; Gunnar Mellgren; Chi-Chung Hui; Hans Hauner; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Common PTP4A1-PHF3-EYS variants are specific for alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Lingjun Zuo; Kesheng Wang; Guilin Wang; Xinghua Pan; Xiangyang Zhang; Heping Zhang; Xingguang Luo
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2013-09-13

6.  Genome-wide association study of alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Jens Treutlein; Sven Cichon; Monika Ridinger; Norbert Wodarz; Michael Soyka; Peter Zill; Wolfgang Maier; Rainald Moessner; Wolfgang Gaebel; Norbert Dahmen; Christoph Fehr; Norbert Scherbaum; Michael Steffens; Kerstin U Ludwig; Josef Frank; H Erich Wichmann; Stefan Schreiber; Nico Dragano; Wolfgang H Sommer; Fernando Leonardi-Essmann; Anbarasu Lourdusamy; Peter Gebicke-Haerter; Thomas F Wienker; Patrick F Sullivan; Markus M Nöthen; Falk Kiefer; Rainer Spanagel; Karl Mann; Marcella Rietschel
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07

7.  The prosurvival protein BAG3: a new participant in vascular homeostasis.

Authors:  Albino Carrizzo; Antonio Damato; Mariateresa Ambrosio; Antonia Falco; Alessandra Rosati; Mario Capunzo; Michele Madonna; Maria C Turco; James L Januzzi; Vincenzo De Laurenzi; Carmine Vecchione
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 8.469

8.  Pleiotropic genes for metabolic syndrome and inflammation.

Authors:  Aldi T Kraja; Daniel I Chasman; Kari E North; Alexander P Reiner; Lisa R Yanek; Tuomas O Kilpeläinen; Jennifer A Smith; Abbas Dehghan; Josée Dupuis; Andrew D Johnson; Mary F Feitosa; Fasil Tekola-Ayele; Audrey Y Chu; Ilja M Nolte; Zari Dastani; Andrew Morris; Sarah A Pendergrass; Yan V Sun; Marylyn D Ritchie; Ahmad Vaez; Honghuang Lin; Symen Ligthart; Letizia Marullo; Rebecca Rohde; Yaming Shao; Mark A Ziegler; Hae Kyung Im; Renate B Schnabel; Torben Jørgensen; Marit E Jørgensen; Torben Hansen; Oluf Pedersen; Ronald P Stolk; Harold Snieder; Albert Hofman; Andre G Uitterlinden; Oscar H Franco; M Arfan Ikram; J Brent Richards; Charles Rotimi; James G Wilson; Leslie Lange; Santhi K Ganesh; Mike Nalls; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; James S Pankow; Josef Coresh; Weihong Tang; W H Linda Kao; Eric Boerwinkle; Alanna C Morrison; Paul M Ridker; Diane M Becker; Jerome I Rotter; Sharon L R Kardia; Ruth J F Loos; Martin G Larson; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Michael A Province; Russell Tracy; Benjamin F Voight; Dhananjay Vaidya; Christopher J O'Donnell; Emelia J Benjamin; Behrooz Z Alizadeh; Inga Prokopenko; James B Meigs; Ingrid B Borecki
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.797

9.  Statistical and biological gene-lifestyle interactions of MC4R and FTO with diet and physical activity on obesity: new effects on alcohol consumption.

Authors:  Dolores Corella; Carolina Ortega-Azorín; Jose V Sorlí; M Isabel Covas; Paula Carrasco; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González; Fernando Arós; José Lapetra; Lluís Serra-Majem; Rosa Lamuela-Raventos; Enrique Gómez-Gracia; Miquel Fiol; Xavier Pintó; Emilio Ros; Amelia Martí; Oscar Coltell; Jose M Ordovás; Ramon Estruch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Single-trait and multi-trait genome-wide association analyses identify novel loci for blood pressure in African-ancestry populations.

Authors:  Jingjing Liang; Thu H Le; Digna R Velez Edwards; Bamidele O Tayo; Kyle J Gaulton; Jennifer A Smith; Yingchang Lu; Richard A Jensen; Guanjie Chen; Lisa R Yanek; Karen Schwander; Salman M Tajuddin; Tamar Sofer; Wonji Kim; James Kayima; Colin A McKenzie; Ervin Fox; Michael A Nalls; J Hunter Young; Yan V Sun; Jacqueline M Lane; Sylvia Cechova; Jie Zhou; Hua Tang; Myriam Fornage; Solomon K Musani; Heming Wang; Juyoung Lee; Adebowale Adeyemo; Albert W Dreisbach; Terrence Forrester; Pei-Lun Chu; Anne Cappola; Michele K Evans; Alanna C Morrison; Lisa W Martin; Kerri L Wiggins; Qin Hui; Wei Zhao; Rebecca D Jackson; Erin B Ware; Jessica D Faul; Alex P Reiner; Michael Bray; Joshua C Denny; Thomas H Mosley; Walter Palmas; Xiuqing Guo; George J Papanicolaou; Alan D Penman; Joseph F Polak; Kenneth Rice; Ken D Taylor; Eric Boerwinkle; Erwin P Bottinger; Kiang Liu; Neil Risch; Steven C Hunt; Charles Kooperberg; Alan B Zonderman; Cathy C Laurie; Diane M Becker; Jianwen Cai; Ruth J F Loos; Bruce M Psaty; David R Weir; Sharon L R Kardia; Donna K Arnett; Sungho Won; Todd L Edwards; Susan Redline; Richard S Cooper; D C Rao; Jerome I Rotter; Charles Rotimi; Daniel Levy; Aravinda Chakravarti; Xiaofeng Zhu; Nora Franceschini
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 6.020

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the promise of inclusion of African ancestry populations in genomics.

Authors:  Amy R Bentley; Shawneequa L Callier; Charles N Rotimi
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 8.617

Review 2.  Appraisal of Gene-Environment Interactions in GWAS for Evidence-Based Precision Nutrition Implementation.

Authors:  Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Juan de Toro-Martín; Marie-Claude Vohl
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2022-08-11

Review 3.  The HERITAGE Family Study: A Review of the Effects of Exercise Training on Cardiometabolic Health, with Insights into Molecular Transducers.

Authors:  Mark A Sarzynski; Treva K Rice; Jean-Pierre Després; Louis Pérusse; Angelo Tremblay; Philip R Stanforth; André Tchernof; Jacob L Barber; Francesco Falciani; Clary Clish; Jeremy M Robbins; Sujoy Ghosh; Robert E Gerszten; Arthur S Leon; James S Skinner; D C Rao; Claude Bouchard
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-05-01

Review 4.  Alcohol and Hypertension-New Insights and Lingering Controversies.

Authors:  Ian B Puddey; Trevor A Mori; Anne E Barden; Lawrence J Beilin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Identifying blood pressure loci whose effects are modulated by multiple lifestyle exposures.

Authors:  Oyomoare L Osazuwa-Peters; R J Waken; Karen L Schwander; Yun Ju Sung; Paul S de Vries; Sarah M Hartz; Daniel I Chasman; Alanna C Morrison; Laura J Bierut; Chengjie Xiong; Lisa de Las Fuentes; D C Rao
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Role of Rare and Low-Frequency Variants in Gene-Alcohol Interactions on Plasma Lipid Levels.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Han Chen; Traci M Bartz; Lawrence F Bielak; Daniel I Chasman; Mary F Feitosa; Nora Franceschini; Xiuqing Guo; Elise Lim; Raymond Noordam; Melissa A Richard; Heming Wang; Brian Cade; L Adrienne Cupples; Paul S de Vries; Franco Giulanini; Jiwon Lee; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Lisa W Martin; Alex P Reiner; Stephen S Rich; Pamela J Schreiner; Stephen Sidney; Colleen M Sitlani; Jennifer A Smith; Ko Willems van Dijk; Jie Yao; Wei Zhao; Myriam Fornage; Sharon L R Kardia; Charles Kooperberg; Ching-Ti Liu; Dennis O Mook-Kanamori; Michael A Province; Bruce M Psaty; Susan Redline; Paul M Ridker; Jerome I Rotter; Eric Boerwinkle; Alanna C Morrison
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2020-06-08

7.  Genome-wide association study on blood pressure traits in the Iranian population suggests ZBED9 as a new locus for hypertension.

Authors:  Goodarz Kolifarhood; Siamak Sabour; Mahdi Akbarzadeh; Bahareh Sedaghati-Khayat; Kamran Guity; Saeid Rasekhi Dehkordi; Mahmoud Amiri Roudbar; Farzad Hadaegh; Fereidoun Azizi; Maryam S Daneshpour
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Lifestyle Risk Score: handling missingness of individual lifestyle components in meta-analysis of gene-by-lifestyle interactions.

Authors:  Hanfei Xu; Karen Schwander; Michael R Brown; Wenyi Wang; R J Waken; Eric Boerwinkle; L Adrienne Cupples; Lisa de Las Fuentes; Diana van Heemst; Oyomoare Osazuwa-Peters; Paul S de Vries; Ko Willems van Dijk; Yun Ju Sung; Xiaoyu Zhang; Alanna C Morrison; D C Rao; Raymond Noordam; Ching-Ti Liu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.351

9.  Deriving stratified effects from joint models investigating gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Vincent Laville; Timothy Majarian; Paul S de Vries; Amy R Bentley; Mary F Feitosa; Yun J Sung; D C Rao; Alisa Manning; Hugues Aschard
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A Long Non-coding RNA, LOC157273, Is an Effector Transcript at the Chromosome 8p23.1-PPP1R3B Metabolic Traits and Type 2 Diabetes Risk Locus.

Authors:  Alisa K Manning; Anton Scott Goustin; Erica L Kleinbrink; Pattaraporn Thepsuwan; Juan Cai; Donghong Ju; Aaron Leong; Miriam S Udler; James Bentley Brown; Mark O Goodarzi; Jerome I Rotter; Robert Sladek; James B Meigs; Leonard Lipovich
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.