| Literature DB >> 29912165 |
De-Sheng Liu1, Xian-Guo Rong2, Hui-Hui Kang3, Li-Ying Ma4, Mark T Hamann5, Wei-Zhong Liu6.
Abstract
Three new diastereomers of polyketides (PKs), raistrickiones A−C (1⁻3), together with two new analogues, raistrickiones D and E (4 and 5), were isolated from a highly productive strain of Penicillium raistrickii, which was subjected to an experimental thermo-change strategy to tap its potential of producing new secondary metabolites. Metabolites 1 and 2 existed in a diastereomeric mixture in the crystal packing according to the X-ray data, and were laboriously separated by semi-preparative HPLC on a chiral column. The structures of 1⁻5 were determined on the basis of the detailed analyses of the spectroscopic data (UV, IR, HRESIMS, 1D, and 2D NMR), single-crystal X-ray diffractions, and comparison of the experimental and calculated electronic circular dichroism spectra. Compounds 1⁻5 represented the first case of 3,5-dihydroxy-4-methylbenzoyl derivatives of natural products. Compounds 1⁻5 exhibited moderate radical scavenging activities against 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) hydrazyl (DPPH).Entities:
Keywords: Penicillium raistrickii; diastereomers; polyketides; thermo-change strategy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29912165 PMCID: PMC6025261 DOI: 10.3390/md16060213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1–5.
NMR Spectroscopic Data (1H 400 MHz and 13C 100 MHz) of 1–3 (DMSO-d6).
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | |
| 1 | 133.0, C | 132.9, C | 133.5, C | |||
| 2, 6 | 106.2, CH | 6.90, s | 106.2, CH | 6.89, s | 106.2, CH | 6.94, s |
| 3, 5 | 156.2, C | 156.2, C | 156.3, C | |||
| 4 | 116.6, C | 116.6, C | 116.7, C | |||
| 7 | 199.0, C | 199.2, C | 199.4, C | |||
| 8 | 74.9, CH | 4.74, dd (7.3, 3.5) | 75.4, CH | 4.69, dd (7.3, 3.3) | 74.8, CH | 4.73, t (5.8) |
| 9 | 80.1, CH | 4.13, m | 79.5, CH | 4.27, td (7.0, 3.3) | 79.3, CH | 4.20, q (5.8) |
| 10 | 27.3, CH2 | 1.84, a m | 27.8, CH2 | 1.93, a m | 26.5, CH2 | 1.84, m; 1.77, m |
| 11 | 32.5, CH2 | 1.84, a m; 1.34, m | 33.4, CH2 | 1.93, a m; 1.31, m | 33.1, CH2 | 1.99, m; 1.34, m |
| 12 | 75.2, CH | 3.77, m | 75.4, CH | 3.99, m | 75.0, CH | 4.04, m |
| 13 | 20.6, CH3 | 1.06, d (6.0) | 21.0, CH3 | 1.02, d (6.1) | 21.0, CH3 | 1.04, d (6.0) |
| 14 | 8.9, CH3 | 1.99, s | 8.9, CH3 | 1.99, s | 8.9, CH3 | 1.99, s |
| 15 | ||||||
| OH-3, 5 | 9.51, s | 9.52, s | 9.49, s | |||
| OH-8 | 4.84, d (7.3) | 4.96, d (7.3) | 5.31, d (5.8) | |||
a Overlapping signals.
Figure 2Key HMBC (red →) and 1H−1H COSY (blue ―) correlations of 1–5.
Figure 3Key NOESY correlations (dashed blue arrows) of 1, 2 and 4.
Figure 4X-ray ORTEP drawings of 1 (a) and 2 (b).
Figure 5Experimental and calculated ECD of 1 (a), 4 (b) and 5 (c).
NMR Spectroscopic Data (1H 400 MHz and 13C 100 MHz) of 4 and 5.
| Position | 4 | 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | |
| 1 | 133.9, C | 136.3, C | ||
| 2, 6 | 109.2, CH | 7.36, s | 108.7, CH | 6.94, s |
| 3, 5 | 156.8, C | 156.8, C | ||
| 4 | 117.6, C | 116.8, C | ||
| 7 | 196.5, C | 190.1, C | ||
| 8 | 102.6, C | 152.7, C | ||
| 9 | 32.3, CH2 | 1.80, m; 1.65, | 112.2, CH | 5.71, t (3.8) |
| 10 | 19.7, CH2 | 1.91, m; 1.65, | 21.6, CH2 | 2.30, m; 2.20, m |
| 11 | 32.7, CH2 | 1.65, | 29.3, CH2 | 1.94, m; 1.55, m |
| 12 | 68.0, CH | 3.88, m | 73.0, CH | 4.04, m |
| 13 | 22.0, CH3 | 1.22, d (6.3) | 21.2, CH3 | 1.32, d (6.2) |
| 14 | 9.0, CH3 | 2.13, s | 9.0, CH3 | 2.15, s |
| 15 | 50.5, CH3 | 3.17, s | ||
| OH-3, 5 | 8.43, s | 8.45, s | ||
| OH-8 | ||||
NMR spectra obtained in acetone-d6. Overlapping signals.
Figure 6Separation of 1 and 2 on a chiral HPLC column.