| Literature DB >> 29910904 |
Xiuli Lu1, Kun Xu1, Shi Tao2, Zewei Shao1, Xu Peng1, Wentuan Bi1, Pengzuo Chen1, Hui Ding1, Wangsheng Chu2, Changzheng Wu1, Yi Xie1.
Abstract
Engineering the electronic structure of two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials endows unique physical and chemical properties. Although developed modification strategies have significantly expanded the applications of 2D nanomaterials, exploring new strategies to regulate the electronic structure of 2D nanomaterials is also expected. Herein, we highlight a new strategy to engineer the electronic structure of 2D subnanoporous nanomaterials. As a proof of concept, based on controllable subnanopore engineering using molecular titanium-oxide incorporation, the electronic band structure of 2D graphitic carbon nitride (CN) nanosheets has been efficiently tuned with the enhancement of visible light absorption as well as separation and the migration rate of photo-excited charge carriers, exhibiting significantly improved photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Our work opens a new door to engineering the intrinsic properties of 2D subnanoporous nanomaterials.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 29910904 PMCID: PMC5975925 DOI: 10.1039/c5sc03551a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1(A) The schematic illustration for the synthesis of TiO–CN from the “bottom-up” polycondensation of the designed precursors. (B) TEM, (C) HAADF-STEM and (D) AFM images of the TiO–CN2 nanosheet. (E) XRD patterns of the CN and TiO–CN2 nanosheets. (F) The solid state 13C NMR spectra of 2D CN and TiO–CN2, and (G) IR spectra of CN and TiO–CN2.
Fig. 2(A and B) Experimental and calculated Ti K-edge XANES spectra of prepared TiO–CN2 compared with the anatase TiO2 powder. (C) FT-EXAFS comparison between the prepared sample and standard anatase TiO2. (D) The illustration of the detailed TiO–CN structure.
Fit results of the first shell around a Ti absorber of the TiO2 powder and the prepared sample using the IFEFFIT code
| Samples | Bonds |
|
|
|
|
| TiO2 | Ti–O | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 1.96 ± 0.02 | 5.8 ± 0.6 | –0.3 |
| TiO–CN | Ti–O | 1 | 2.07 ± 0.05 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | –8.0 |
| Ti–N(1) | 3 | 2.14 ± 0.08 | 5.0 ± 0.5 | –5.0 | |
| Ti–N(2) | 3 | 2.51 ± 0.09 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | –5.0 |
Note: (1) S02 = 0.8 from the fit of the TiO2 powder was used in the fit of the sample; (2) the coordination number of the first shell of the sample was fixed in order to reduce the varied parameters.
Fig. 3(A) The UV-visible absorption spectra of 2D CN and TiO–CN. (B) The plot of transformed Kubelka–Munk function vs. photon energy for 2D CN and TiO–CN2. (C) Band structure diagram of 2D CN and TiO–CN2. (D) Fluorescence emission spectra of 2D CN and TiO–CN samples. (E) EIS and (F) photocurrent responses of the CN and TiO–CN2 electrodes.
Fig. 4(A) Comparison of the PL relative intensity of 2-hydroxyterephthalic generated by reacting terephthalic acid with ˙OH radicals in the suspension of CN and TiO–CN nanosheets under visible light (λ > 420 nm) for 25 min. (B) DMPO spin-trapping ESR spectra of samples in aqueous dispersions for DMPO-˙OH. (C) Time-dependent photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B by the CN and TiO–CN samples under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm).