Literature DB >> 29909110

Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Normal Transcatheter Valve Function.

Rebecca T Hahn1, Jonathon Leipsic2, Pamela S Douglas3, Wael A Jaber4, Neil J Weissman5, Philippe Pibarot6, Philipp Blanke2, Jae K Oh7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to establish parameters for identifying normal function for each of the 3 iterations of balloon-expandable valves and 2 iterations of self-expanding valves.
BACKGROUND: Expected transthoracic echocardiographic Doppler-derived hemodynamic data for transcatheter aortic valves inform pre-implant decision-making and post-implanted monitoring of longitudinal valve function.
METHODS: We collected the echocardiography core Lab measured mean gradients and effective orifice area (EOA) from discharge or 30-day echocardiograms from randomized trials; the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trials for the balloon-expandable valves and the Medtronic CoreValve US Pivotal trial and Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R United States IDE Clinical Study for the self-expanding valves.
RESULTS: For all SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) valve sizes, mean EOA is 1.70 ± 0.49 cm2 with a mean gradient of 9.36 ± 4.13 mm Hg. For all SAPIEN XT valve sizes, mean EOA is 1.67 ± 0.46 cm2 with a mean gradient of 9.52 ± 3.64 mm Hg. For all SAPIEN 3 valve sizes, the mean EOA is 1.66 ± 0.38 cm2 with a mean gradient of 11.18 ± 4.35 mm Hg. For all CoreValve valve sizes, the mean EOA is 1.88 ± 0.56 cm2 with a mean gradient of 8.85 ± 4.14 mm Hg. For all Evolut R valve sizes, the mean EOA is 2.01 ± 0.65 cm2 with a mean gradient of 7.52 ± 3.19 mm Hg. The SAPIEN 3 post-implant EOA was progressively larger for each quintile of baseline annular area by computed tomography (p < 0.001). Similarly, for the Evolut R valve, post-implantation EOA was significantly larger for each quintile of baseline annular perimeter (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Tables of expected mean transcatheter aortic valve hemodynamics by valve type and size are essential in evaluating the function of these transcatheter prosthetic valves. Tables of expected EOA by the native annular anatomy may be useful for pre-implantation decision making. Criteria for defining structural valve dysfunction are proposed.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  echocardiography; effective orifice area; hemodynamics; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Year:  2018        PMID: 29909110     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  26 in total

1.  Valve hemodynamic performance and myocardial strain after implantation of a third-generation, balloon-expandable, transcatheter aortic valve.

Authors:  Sara Fernandez-Santos; Alexis Théron; Philippe Pibarot; Frédéric Collart; Martine Gilard; Marina Urena; Tomas Hovorka; Philipp Kahlert; José Luis Zamorano Gomez
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Two-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Mechanical vs Self-expanding Valves: The REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Michael J Reardon; Ted E Feldman; Christopher U Meduri; Raj R Makkar; Daniel O'Hair; Axel Linke; Dean J Kereiakes; Ron Waksman; Vasilis Babliaros; Robert C Stoler; Gregory J Mishkel; David G Rizik; Vijay S Iyer; Thomas G Gleason; Didier Tchétché; Joshua D Rovin; Thibault Lhermusier; Didier Carrié; Robert W Hodson; Dominic J Allocco; Ian T Meredith
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 3.  The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Low Incidence of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Extremely Small Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with 20-mm Sapien 3.

Authors:  Kazue Okajima; Ikki Komatsu; Todd B Seto
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-08-25

5.  Simultaneous transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement of severely degenerated bioprosthetic aortic and mitral prostheses.

Authors:  Hendrik Wienemann; Victor Mauri; Elmar Kuhn; Stephan Baldus; Matti Adam
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.138

Review 6.  Aortic Stenosis: New Insights in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention.

Authors:  Saki Ito; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 3.101

Review 7.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Masaki Miyasaka
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-06-16

8.  Numerical evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve performance during heart beating and its post-deployment fluid-structure interaction analysis.

Authors:  Ram P Ghosh; Gil Marom; Matteo Bianchi; Karl D'souza; Wojtek Zietak; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-02-24

9.  Balloon-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses: clinical and echocardiographic long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Victor X Mosquera; Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera; Yago Vilela-González; Carlos Velasco; Jorge Salgado-Fernández; Ramón Calviño-Santos; Nicolás Vázquez-González; José M Vázquez-Rodríguez; José M Herrera-Noreña
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

Review 10.  Clinical and Technical Challenges of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Pier Pasquale Leone; Fabio Fazzari; Francesco Cannata; Jorge Sanz-Sanchez; Antonio Mangieri; Lorenzo Monti; Ottavia Cozzi; Giulio Giuseppe Stefanini; Renato Bragato; Antonio Colombo; Bernhard Reimers; Damiano Regazzoli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.