Sean C Lucan1, Andrew R Maroko2, Jason L Seitchik3, Dong Hum Yoon3, Luisa E Sperry4, Clyde B Schechter5. 1. Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Health System, Bronx, New York. Electronic address: slucan@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Environmental, Occupational, and Geospatial Health Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York. 3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. 4. Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York. 5. Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Health System, Bronx, New York.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Studies of neighborhood food environments typically focus on select stores (especially supermarkets) and/or restaurants (especially fast-food outlets), make presumptions about healthfulness without assessing actual items for sale, and ignore other kinds of businesses offering foods/drinks. The current study assessed availability of select healthful and less-healthful foods/drinks from all storefront businesses in an urban environment and considered implications for food-environment research and community health. METHODS: Cross-sectional assessment in 2013 of all storefront businesses (n=852) on all street segments (n=1,253) in 32 census tracts of the Bronx, New York. Investigators assessed for healthful items (produce, whole grains, nuts, water, milk) and less-healthful items (refined sweets, salty/fatty fare, sugar-added drinks, and alcohol), noting whether items were from food businesses (e.g., supermarkets and restaurants) or other storefront businesses (OSB, e.g., barber shops, gyms, hardware stores, laundromats). Data were analyzed in 2017. RESULTS: Half of all businesses offered food/drink items. More than one seventh of all street segments (more than one third in higher-poverty census tracts) had businesses selling food/drink. OSB accounted for almost one third of all businesses offering food/drink items (about one quarter of businesses offering any healthful items and more than two thirds of businesses offering only less-healthful options). CONCLUSIONS: Food environments include many businesses not primarily focused on selling foods/drinks. Studies that do not consider OSB may miss important food/drink sources, be incomplete and inaccurate, and potentially misguide interventions. OSB hold promise for improving food environments and community health by offering healthful items; some already do.
INTRODUCTION: Studies of neighborhood food environments typically focus on select stores (especially supermarkets) and/or restaurants (especially fast-food outlets), make presumptions about healthfulness without assessing actual items for sale, and ignore other kinds of businesses offering foods/drinks. The current study assessed availability of select healthful and less-healthful foods/drinks from all storefront businesses in an urban environment and considered implications for food-environment research and community health. METHODS: Cross-sectional assessment in 2013 of all storefront businesses (n=852) on all street segments (n=1,253) in 32 census tracts of the Bronx, New York. Investigators assessed for healthful items (produce, whole grains, nuts, water, milk) and less-healthful items (refined sweets, salty/fatty fare, sugar-added drinks, and alcohol), noting whether items were from food businesses (e.g., supermarkets and restaurants) or other storefront businesses (OSB, e.g., barber shops, gyms, hardware stores, laundromats). Data were analyzed in 2017. RESULTS: Half of all businesses offered food/drink items. More than one seventh of all street segments (more than one third in higher-poverty census tracts) had businesses selling food/drink. OSB accounted for almost one third of all businesses offering food/drink items (about one quarter of businesses offering any healthful items and more than two thirds of businesses offering only less-healthful options). CONCLUSIONS: Food environments include many businesses not primarily focused on selling foods/drinks. Studies that do not consider OSB may miss important food/drink sources, be incomplete and inaccurate, and potentially misguide interventions. OSB hold promise for improving food environments and community health by offering healthful items; some already do.
Authors: Christine A Vaughan; Deborah A Cohen; Madhumita Ghosh-Dastidar; Gerald P Hunter; Tamara Dubowitz Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Erin R Hager; Alexandra Cockerham; Nicole O'Reilly; Donna Harrington; James Harding; Kristen M Hurley; Maureen M Black Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Alexander D Bryan; Zoë A Ginsburg; Ellen B Rubinstein; Hilary J Frankel; Andrew R Maroko; Clyde B Schechter; Kristen Cooksey Stowers; Sean C Lucan Journal: J Community Health Date: 2019-04
Authors: Alicia J Cohen; James L Rudolph; Kali S Thomas; Elizabeth Archambault; Megan M Bowman; Christine Going; Michele Heisler; Thomas P O'Toole; David M Dosa Journal: Fed Pract Date: 2020-01
Authors: Sean C Lucan; Andrew R Maroko; Achint N Patel; Ilirjan Gjonbalaj; Brian Elbel; Clyde B Schechter Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Sean C Lucan; Andrew R Maroko; Achint N Patel; Ilirjan Gjonbalaj; Courtney Abrams; Stephanie Rettig; Brian Elbel; Clyde B Schechter Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 4.910