Debdeep Banerjee1, Saikiran Raghavapuram2, Susanne Jeffus3, Seamus Murphy4, Benjamin Tharian4. 1. School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas, USA. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA. 3. Division of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA. 4. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Metastasis to the GI tract is uncommon, but when it occurs, the stomach is the most common site.The most common primary cancers that metastasize to the stomach include breast and renal cell carcinoma. Among breast cancers, invasive lobular cancer is known to metastasize more often to the stomach than does invasive ductal cancer. The clinical presentation of such a metastasis is very nonspecific.The endoscopic presentation is heterogeneous as well, with solitary and submucosal lesions being the most common finding. Gastric metastasis indicates a short survival, but in comparison with metastatic disease from other organs, metastases from the breast and kidneys carry better prognoses.We present an interesting case of a woman with a known history of breast cancer in remission who was evaluated for dyspeptic symptoms and weight loss (Fig. 1; Video 1, available online at www.VideoGIE.org). EGD showed diffuse thickening of the entire stomach mucosa, and EUS showed a thickened gastric wall (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4). FNA with a 22G needle was initially attempted, but the yield from rapid on-site evaluation was poor because of the rigidity of the tissue. Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) with a 19G needle was then performed, resulting in a good tissue yield. Histologic examination showed neoplastic infiltration of the stomach wall, and immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the primary cancer was in the breast (Fig. 5). The patient later underwent positron emission tomography, which showed widespread metastatic disease (Fig. 6).
Figure 1
CT scan showed mild focal thickening of the distal gastric body and antrum.
Figure 2
EGD showed thickened and rigid mucosal folds throughout the stomach, characteristic of linitis plastica.
Figure 3
Retroflexion on EGD was successfully performed after some difficulty showing prominent mucosal ridges and revealing a “waffle-like” appearance.
Figure 4
EUS showed a thickened gastric wall and loss of normal wall-layer definition with a small amount of perigastric ascites.
Figure 5
EUS-guided FNB showed infiltrative neoplastic cells in the gastric wall consistent with a breast primary that stained positive for estrogen receptors. FNB, fine-needle biopsy.
Figure 6
PET scan showed increased activity along the gastric antrum/first part of the duodenum and metabolically active ascites concerning for potential peritoneal implants. PET, positron emission tomography.
CT scan showed mild focal thickening of the distal gastric body and antrum.EGD showed thickened and rigid mucosal folds throughout the stomach, characteristic of linitis plastica.Retroflexion on EGD was successfully performed after some difficulty showing prominent mucosal ridges and revealing a “waffle-like” appearance.EUS showed a thickened gastric wall and loss of normal wall-layer definition with a small amount of perigastric ascites.EUS-guided FNB showed infiltrative neoplastic cells in the gastric wall consistent with a breast primary that stained positive for estrogen receptors. FNB, fine-needle biopsy.PET scan showed increased activity along the gastric antrum/first part of the duodenum and metabolically active ascites concerning for potential peritoneal implants. PET, positron emission tomography.Through this case, we wish to highlight that patients with a known history of cancer should be evaluated with endoscopy and possibly EUS, even when the symptoms appear to be subtle and the primary cancer is known to be in remission.Our anecdotal experience leads us to recommend FNB over FNA for EUS-guided biopsy of gastric linitis plastica. However, after doing a literature review, we find inconclusive evidence to support this practice. In 2015, a study by Attili et al found that FNB is not as beneficial for an accurate diagnosis but overall is helpful to pathologists.
Disclosure
All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
Authors: Biagio Ricciuti; Giulia Costanza Leonardi; Noemi Ravaioli; Andrea De Giglio; Marta Brambilla; Enrico Prosperi; Franca Ribacchi; Marialuisa Meacci; Lucio Crinò; Daniele Maiettini; Rita Chiari; Giulio Metro Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 3.588