Literature DB >> 29904230

Calculation of Forward Scatter Dose Distribution at the skin entrance from the patient table for fluoroscopically guided interventions using a pencil beam convolution kernel.

Sarath Vijayan1, Zhenyu Xiong1, Chao Guo1, Jonathan Troville1, Naveed Islam1, Stephen Rudin1,2, Daniel R Bednarek1,2.   

Abstract

The forward-scatter dose distribution generated by the patient table during fluoroscopic interventions and its contribution to the skin dose is studied. The forward-scatter dose distribution to skin generated by a water table-equivalent phantom and the patient table are calculated using EGSnrc Monte-Carlo and Gafchromic film as a function of x-ray field size and beam penetrability. Forward scatter point spread function's (PSFn) were generated with EGSnrc from a 1×1 mm simulated primary pencil beam incident on the water model and patient table. The forward-scatter point spread function normalized to the primary is convolved over the primary-dose distribution to generate scatter-dose distributions. The utility of PSFn to calculate the entrance skin dose distribution using DTS (dose tracking system) software is investigated. The forward-scatter distribution calculations were performed for 2.32 mm, 3.10 mm, 3.84 mm and 4.24 mm Al HVL x-ray beams for 5×5 cm, 9×9 cm, 13.5×13.5 cm sized x-ray fields for water and 3.1 mm Al HVL x-ray beam for 16.5×16.5 cm field for the patient table. The skin dose is determined with DTS by convolution of the scatter dose PSFn's and with Gafchromic film under PMMA "patient-simulating" blocks for uniform and for shaped x-ray fields. The normalized forward-scatter distribution determined using the convolution method for water table-equivalent phantom agreed with that calculated for the full field using EGSnrc within ±6%. The normalized forward-scatter dose distribution calculated for the patient table for a 16.5×16.5 cm FOV, agreed with that determined using film within ±2.4%. For the homogenous PMMA phantom, the skin dose using DTS was calculated within ±2 % of that measured with the film for both uniform and non-uniform x-ray fields. The convolution method provides improved accuracy over using a single forward-scatter value over the entire field and is a faster alternative to performing full-field Monte-Carlo calculations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EGSnrc; ROI attenuator; dose; forward scatter; gafchromic film; point spread function

Year:  2018        PMID: 29904230      PMCID: PMC5996388          DOI: 10.1117/12.2294920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  6 in total

1.  Energy dependent calibration of XR-QA2 radiochromic film with monochromatic and polychromatic x-ray beams.

Authors:  F Di Lillo; G Mettivier; A Sarno; G Tromba; N Tomic; S Devic; P Russo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Monte Carlo investigation of backscatter point spread function for X-ray imaging examinations.

Authors:  Zhenyu Xiong; Sarath Vijayan; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-09

3.  Calculation of the entrance skin dose distribution for fluoroscopically guided interventions using a pencil beam backscatter model.

Authors:  Sarath Vijayan; Zhenyu Xiong; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-14

4.  Assessment of organ and effective dose when using region-of-interest attenuators in cone-beam CT and interventional fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Zhenyu Xiong; Sarath Vijayan; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-22

5.  Skin dose mapping for non-uniform x-ray fields using a backscatter point spread function.

Authors:  Sarath Vijayan; Zhenyu Xiong; Alok Shankar; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-09

Review 6.  Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair.

Authors:  Stephen Balter; John W Hopewell; Donald L Miller; Louis K Wagner; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.