Literature DB >> 17920940

The validity of in vivo ultrasonographic grading of osteoarthritic femoral condylar cartilage: a comparison with in vitro ultrasonographic and histologic gradings.

C-L Lee1, M-H Huang, C-Y Chai, C-H Chen, J-Y Su, Y-C Tien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish an ultrasonographic (US) grading for semiquantitative evaluation of the femoral condylar cartilage of knee osteoarthritis (OA), in vivo, and compare the in vivo US grading with the in vitro US and histologic gradings.
DESIGN: Ninety-five patients going to receive total knee arthroplasty because of OA of the knee were recruited. US examination was performed in vivo in the day before operation using a grading system including parameters of margin sharpness, clarity and thickness. Specimens of the medial and lateral distal femoral condyles taken during the operation were graded with in vitro US and histologic evaluation. The correlation between the in vivo US and in vitro US as well as between the in vivo US and histologic gradings was analyzed.
RESULTS: In 172 femoral condyles (including medial and lateral ones), the distribution of grading ranged from Grade 1 to 6 in in vivo US and from Grade 1 to 4 in histologic examination. The in vivo US grading was significantly correlated to in vitro US grading over anterior and middle areas (p<0.001, Rho=0.35 and 0.45, respectively) and histologic grading over these two areas (p<0.001, Rho=0.40 and 0.36, respectively). When the cases with maximal angle of knee flexion less than 120 degree were excluded, the correlation was better.
CONCLUSIONS: The significant correlation between in vivo US and histologic gradings might permit semi-quantitative in vivo US assessment of osteoarthritic femoral condylar cartilage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17920940     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  34 in total

1.  How precisely does ultrasonographic evaluation reflect the histological status of the articular cartilage of the knee joint?

Authors:  Kosuke Maeguchi; Hiromu Ito; Yugo Morita; Moritoshi Furu; Takayuki Fujii; Masayuki Azukizawa; Akinori Okahata; Kohei Nishitani; Shinichi Kuriyama; Shinichiro Nakamura; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-08

Review 2.  Ultrasound imaging and guidance in the management of knee osteoarthritis in regenerative medicine field.

Authors:  Alper Murat Ulasli; Levent Ozcakar; William D Murrel
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-11-30

3.  The association between patellar alignments features and tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ahmet Özgül; Zafer Günendi; Serdar Kesikburun; Özlem Köroğlu Omaç; Mehmet Ali Taşkaynatan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Comparison of articular cartilage images assessed by high-frequency ultrasound microscope and scanning acoustic microscope.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hagiwara; Yoshifumi Saijo; Akira Ando; Yoshito Onoda; Hideaki Suda; Eiichi Chimoto; Kouki Hatori; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of the femoral cartilage thickness in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Arif Kaya; Murat Kara; Tülay Tiftik; Mehmet Engin Tezcan; Mehmet Akif Öztürk; Ayşen Akıncı; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of the femoral cartilage thickness after unilateral arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

Authors:  Semih Akkaya; Nuray Akkaya; Levent Ozcakar; Alper Kılıç; Fusun Sahin; Nilgun Simsir Atalay; Fusun Ardic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Ultrasonographic Measurement of the Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Patients with Behçet's Disease.

Authors:  I Batmaz; M Kara; T Tiftik; M Yildiz; R Çevik; L Özçakar
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 0.171

8.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of femoral cartilage thickness in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  I Batmaz; M Kara; T Tiftik; E Çapkin; M Karkucak; Ö F Serdar; F Kartal; M A Sariyildiz; L Özçakar
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 0.171

9.  Ultrasonographic measurement of femoral cartilage thickness in acromegalic patients.

Authors:  Murat Karkucak; İbrahim Batmaz; Nadim Civan; Fatih Kilinc; Erhan Capkin; Mustafa Akif Sariyildiz; Melek Aslan Garipoğlu; Mustafa Avni Onder; Levent Ozcakar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  The relationship between femoral cartilage thickness and muscle strength in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Serpil Tuna; Nilüfer Balcı; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.