| Literature DB >> 29900283 |
Batol Masruri1, Azadeh Ashtarinezhad1, Parvaneh Yekzamani1,2.
Abstract
Exposure to chemical and physical factors occur in many occupations. Exposure to ambient pollutants such as noise, heavy metals, drugs enhance free radicals and can cause oxidative stress. The aim of the present project was to investigate noise and lead as two workplace stressors in rats. 20 male rats were assigned into 4 groups randomly. Rats in control group was not exposed to any stressor agent, while the first group was exposed to noise (105 dB, 4 kHz), the second group was exposed to lead acetate (gavage,4 mg/kg), and the last group was exposed to both lead and noise. In order to assess oxidative stress, the serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), as a product of lipid peroxidation was measured by thiobarbituric acid and also total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were measured by using ELISA kits. Our research showed significant enhancement in levels of malondialdehyde in exposed groups compare to control group. Also our results showed considerable decrease in levels of TAC in exposed groups compared to control group. Lead and noise exposure for 30 days caused a statistically significant enhancement in MDA level and significant decrease in the serum TAC level. On the other hand, statistically no significant difference was observed between the MDA and TAC levels between exposed groups. Moreover, body weight between exposed groups have decreased compared to control group. The outcomes of this study confirms the effect of noise and lead on lipid peroxidation. However, further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms of oxidative stress through lead and noise exposure.Entities:
Keywords: Lead acetate; Lipid peroxidation; Male rat; Malondialdehyde; Noise; Oxidative stress
Year: 2018 PMID: 29900283 PMCID: PMC5996501 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
The serum MDA level (Mean ± SD) before and after exposure (n = 5 rats).
| Groups | MDA (Before of exposure) nmol /g Hb | MDA) After 30 days (nmol /g Hb |
|---|---|---|
| Control | ||
| Noise | ||
| Lead | ||
| Lead plus noise |
*P < 0.05 compared to control group.
Fig. 1The effect of lead and noise on lipid peroxidation levels (Mean ± SD) between control and exposed groups (n = 5 rats) for 30 days. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 compared to control group.
The serum TAC level (Mean ± SD) before and after exposure (n = 5 rats).
| Groups | TAC (Before of exposure) nmol/L | TAC)After 30 days ( nmol/L |
|---|---|---|
| Control | ||
| Noise | ||
| Lead | ||
| Lead plus noise |
*P < 0.05 compared to control group.
Fig. 2The effect of lead and noise on total antioxidant capacity levels (Mean ± SD) between control and exposed groups (n = 5 rats) for 30 days. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 compared to control group.
Body weight (Mean ± SD) in experimental groups (n = 5 rats).
| Groups | Days | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | |||
| Noise | |||
| Lead | |||
| Lead plus noise | |||
*P < 0.05 compared to control group.
| Subject area | Occupational health |
| More specific subject area | Biochemistry, Toxicology |
| Type of data | Table, figure |
| How data was acquired | All samples analyzed according to Aust and Buege method for MDA and TAC assay kit for TAC. Body weight also was measured with laboratorial scale. |
| Data format | Raw, analyzed |
| Experimental factors | Blood samples collected before and after exposure. MDA levels was measured by UV–vis spectrophotometer at 535 nm and TAC was determined at |
| Experimental features | The serum levels of MDA and TAC were determined. |
| Data source location | Tehran, Iran |
| Data accessibility | Data are reported in this article. |