| Literature DB >> 31412319 |
Yongzhi Li1, Benkang Shi2, Fengming Dong1, Xingwang Zhu1, Bing Liu1, Yili Liu1.
Abstract
This study determined whether or not benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) is involved in inflammatory responses, apoptosis, and the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT3)/nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)- and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-mediated oxidative stress pathways. Forty rats were divided into four groups: control; HFD; testosterone; and HFD+testosterone. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining was used to assess histologic changes. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot analysis were used to detect levels of related proteins. Compared with the control group, the prostate levels of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), malondialdehyde (MDA), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) were significantly increased, while the levels of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione (GSH), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were decreased. The TNF-κB, Bcl-2, and caspase-3 levels were increased, while the Bax level was markedly decreased. The cytoplasmic expression of STAT3 and NF-κB was increased, while the nuclear expression of Nrf2 was markedly decreased compared with the control group. In summary, our results demonstrated that a long-term HFD might cause changes in inflammatory responses, apoptosis, and oxidative stress, thus contributing to prostatic hyperplasia. The underlying mechanisms might be related to the STAT3/NF-κB- and Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress pathway.Entities:
Keywords: apoptosis; benign prostatic hyperplasia; high-fat diet; inflammatory responses; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31412319 PMCID: PMC6710068 DOI: 10.18632/aging.102138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Effects of a long-term HFD on body weight, prostatic wet weight, and the prostatic index.
| Control | 458.92±32.5 | 256.32±15.6 | 0.56±0.11 |
| HFD | 495.56±29.5## | 382.65±29.6## | 0.77±0.16## |
| Testosterone | 468.49±49.6 | 388.32±32.1## | 0.83±0.21## |
| HFD+ testosterone | 501.86±82.1## | 420.21±27.9## | 0.84±0.15## |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. ## indicates P<0.01 compared with the control group
Figure 1Histologic changes in rat prostate (HE stain, ×40). (A) Control group; (B) HFD group; (C) Testosterone group; (D) HFD+testosterone group.
Figure 2Effects of a long-term HFD on prostatic COX-2, iNOS, TNF-α, IL-6, TGF-β1, MCP-1, MDA, SOD, GSH-Px, GR, and GSH (A–K) levels by ELISA. Results are representative of three independent experiments. ##p<0.01 and #p<0.05, compared with the control group; *p<0.05 compared with the testosterone group.
Figure 3Effects of a long-term HFD on the expression of NF-κB, Bcl-2, Bax, caspase-3, STAT3, NF-κB, p65, and Nrf2 protein. ##p<0.01 and #p<0.05 compared with the control group; *p<0.05 compared with the testosterone group.