Literature DB >> 29899948

79/81Br nuclear quadrupole resonance spectroscopic characterization of halogen bonds in supramolecular assemblies.

P Cerreia Vioglio1, P M J Szell2, M R Chierotti1, R Gobetto1, D L Bryce2.   

Abstract

Despite the applicability of solid-state NMR to study the halogen bond, the direct NMR detection of 79/81Br covalently bonded to carbon remains impractical due to extremely large spectral widths, even at ultra-high magnetic fields. In contrast, nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) offers comparatively sharp resonances. Here, we demonstrate the abilities of 79/81Br NQR to characterize the electronic changes in the C-Br···N halogen bonding motifs found in supramolecular assemblies constructed from 1,4-dibromotetrafluorobenzene and nitrogen-containing heterocycles. An increase in the bromine quadrupolar coupling constant is observed, which correlates linearly with the halogen bond distance (dBr···N). Notably, 79/81Br NQR is able to distinguish between two symmetry-independent halogen bonds in the same crystal structure. This approach offers a rapid and reliable indication for the occurrence of a halogen bond, with experimental times limited only by the observation of 79/81Br NQR resonances.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29899948      PMCID: PMC5969492          DOI: 10.1039/c8sc01094c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Sci        ISSN: 2041-6520            Impact factor:   9.825


Introduction

The halogen bond (XB) consists of a non-covalent interaction between the area of lower electron density1 associated with a covalently bonded halogen atom, named the σ-hole,2,3 and a Lewis base. It is conveniently schematized as R–X···Y, where X is the halogen bond donor (strength: I > Br > Cl ≫ F),4 R is a group covalently bonded to X, and Y represents the electron-rich nucleophilic region of the halogen bond acceptor.5 With unique physicochemical properties such as directionality,6,7 strength,8,9 tunability,10,11 hydrophobicity,12 and selectivity,13,14 the halogen bond has become an important tool in modern supramolecular chemistry.15,16 Many promising applications are evident in medicinal chemistry,17–19 catalysis,20 and conductive materials,21 to name a few, and full literature reviews covering key advances in the field are available.22,23 Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) is a powerful tool to assess the occurrence of the halogen bond,24 to reliably determine phase purity,25 and to quantitatively relate local structural changes to geometrical features of the interaction.26,27 A key advantage of using SSNMR to characterize the halogen bond is the ability to non-destructively analyze samples in their powdered form, offering information on the chemical shift, quadrupolar coupling, dipolar coupling, and J-coupling.25,27–32 Notably, SSNMR experiments on 13C, 15N, 31P, or 77Se have been used at natural isotopic abundance to evaluate geometrical features of the halogen bond.33–35 Direct observation of the halogen bond donor has been limited to the study of 35Cl (nuclear electric quadrupole moment Q(35Cl) = –81.65(80) mb)36 covalently bonded to carbon,31 due to the broad spectral widths associated with the heavier halogens. This broadening arises as a consequence of the greater quadrupole moments of 79/81Br (Q(79Br) = 313(3) mb), 81Br (Q(81Br) = 262(3) mb), and especially 127I (Q(127I) = –696(12) mb),36 resulting in impractically broad solid-state NMR spectra. As the great majority of halogen-bonded compounds exhibit a halogen covalently bonded to a carbon atom,23 there have been various efforts towards the analysis of the 13C resonances for studying the halogen bond donor. However, 13C SSNMR spectroscopy of carbon covalently bonded to a quadrupolar halogen can be challenging due to the line shape distortion caused by residual dipolar coupling to the quadrupolar nucleus.26,27 As noted, 79/81Br and 127I both remain inaccessible by SSNMR when they are covalently bonded to carbon. Conversely, nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) offers advantages over SSNMR to directly characterize the XB; it enables the direct detection of the XB donor site and does not require an external magnetic field. For an exposition of the relative advantages and disadvantages of SSNMR and NQR, readers are referred to a recent Concepts article.37 The NQR frequencies for spin-3/2 nuclides, such as 79Br and 81Br, are a product of the quadrupolar coupling constant (CQ) and the asymmetry parameter (η), given by eqn (1): In eqn (2) and (3), e refers to the fundamental charge; V11, V22, and V33 refer to components of the electric field gradient tensor (|V33| ≥ |V22| ≥ |V11|); Q refers to the quadrupole moment of the nucleus; h refers to Planck's constant. In turn, the quadrupolar coupling parameters yield information on the electric field gradient (EFG) at the nucleus, providing information on electronic structure and bonding.38 NQR has long played a role in characterizing charge-transfer complexes, but sparse information exists on the “halogen bond” as defined above.39–42 Consequently, the newest class of iconic halogen bond donors has not been thoroughly studied by NQR due in part to the fact that NMR has largely overtaken the field. Furthermore, clear and general relationships between the NQR frequencies and particular geometrical features have not yet been identified. Here, we report a systematic study of a series of prototypical C–Br···N XB motifs exhibiting different XB lengths and strengths (see Fig. 1) by 79Br and 81Br NQR spectroscopy. The geometrical features of the halogen bonds in each supramolecular assembly are summarized in Table 1. As the EFG at 79Br and 81Br are identical, the difference in the measured quadrupolar coupling constants for both isotopes is due to their different quadrupole moments (Q). Therefore, the 79Br and 81Br NQR frequencies should be related by a factor of ∼1.19 [Q(79Br)/Q(81Br)], providing a built-in verification of the experimental results.
Fig. 1

Depiction of the X-ray crystal structures of p-dibromotetrafluorobenzene (1) and its cocrystals (2–6), showing the C–Br···N halogen bond by dashed brown lines.

Table 1

Geometrical parameters of the halogen bonds in compounds 1–6, including the normalized distance parameter (RXB), the C–Br···N halogen bond angle (θC–Br···N), and the Br···N halogen bond length (dBr···N)

EntryCompoundCSD ref. 43 R XB a θ C–Br···N (°) d Br···N (Å)Note
1 p-DibromotetrafluorobenzeneZZZAVJ ref. 44
2 (Acridine)(1)712 047 ref. 450.891 b 172.13 b 3.031 b
3 (Phenazine)(1)712 045 ref. 450.878172.592.985
4 (4,4′-Bipyridine)(1)199 297 ref. 460.846177.212.878Site 4A
0.876176.402.979Site 4B
5 (1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane)(1)649 676 ref. 470.851167.692.894Site 5A
0.856169.572.910Site 5B
6 (Piperazine)(1)649 675 ref. 470.847177.722.881

The normalized distance parameter RXB has been calculated as the ratio between the halogen bond length (dBr···N) and the sum of the van der Waals radii of Br and N.

The X-ray crystal structure shows disorder on the position of the nitrogen, resulting in two possible halogen bond geometries; the reported values herein are the averages over the two disordered halogen bond sites.

The normalized distance parameter RXB has been calculated as the ratio between the halogen bond length (dBr···N) and the sum of the van der Waals radii of Br and N. The X-ray crystal structure shows disorder on the position of the nitrogen, resulting in two possible halogen bond geometries; the reported values herein are the averages over the two disordered halogen bond sites.

Results and discussion

The structures of pure p-dibromotetrafluorobenzene (p-DBrTFB) and a series of cocrystals featuring C–Br···N halogen bonds are shown in Fig. 1. The NQR experiments, consisting of one-dimensional spectra and nutation data, are presented in Fig. 2 and 3, respectively. The data obtained from the 81Br and 79Br NQR experiments are summarized in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.
Fig. 2

Pure 81Br and 79Br NQR resonances of compounds 1–6 depicted on a unified scale to emphasise the shift in the NQR resonance frequencies. The two crystallographically inequivalent bromine sites in compounds 4 and 5 are denoted 4A & 4B and 5A & 5B, respectively. Regions between 264 and 259 MHz (81Br) & 316 and 310 MHz (79Br) did not have any resonances, and were removed for clarity.

Fig. 3

81Br nutation-echo NQR spectra of compounds 1–6. The most intense F1 slices are shown. As the positive part is merely the antisymmetric image of the negative half, the differences in intensity between the positive and the negative half are likely due to RF inhomogeneity.

Table 2

Experimental and DFT-calculated 81Br NQR frequencies (νQ), and quadrupolar parameters (η, CQ) of the halogen bonded compounds under investigation

Compounds ν Q exp. (MHz) ν Q calc. a (MHz) η exp. b η calc. C Q exp. (MHz) C Q calc. (MHz)FWHM (kHz)
1 258.34 ± 0.02264.80.13 ± 0.040.114515.23 ± 1.79528.423
2 266.22 ± 0.04268.90.15 ± 0.070.117530.45 ± 3.72536.666
3 264.64 ± 0.04266.90.12 ± 0.090.109528.01 ± 3.81532.884
4A 267.32 ± 0.01270.40.10 ± 0.080.117533.75 ± 2.85539.517
4B 264.47 ± 0.01269.50.14 ± 0.060.125527.22 ± 2.95537.715
5A 267.66 ± 0.04268.70.15 ± 0.050.120533.32 ± 2.67536.230
5B 268.33 ± 0.04268.80.14 ± 0.060.119535.02 ± 3.00536.340
6 268.69 ± 0.02269.20.16 ± 0.060.116535.10 ± 3.43537.126

The calculated νQ frequencies were obtained using eqn (1) and the corresponding calculated η and CQ values.

Measured from the 81Br nutation NQR spectra.

Table 3

Experimental and DFT-calculated 79Br NQR frequencies (νQ), and quadrupolar parameters (η, CQ) of the halogen bonded compounds under investigation

Compounds ν Q exp. (MHz) ν Q calc. a (MHz) η exp. b η calc. C Q exp. (MHz) C Q calc. (MHz)FWHM (kHz)
1 309.32 ± 0.02316.90.13 ± 0.040.114616.92 ± 2.14632.422
2 318.61 ± 0.05321.90.15 ± 0.070.117634.84 ± 4.45642.395
3 316.81 ± 0.04319.50.12 ± 0.090.109632.25 ± 4.55637.798
4A 320.00 ± 0.02323.60.10 ± 0.080.117638.94 ± 3.41645.817
4B 316.59 ± 0.02322.60.14 ± 0.060.125631.12 ± 3.54643.516
5A 320.45 ± 0.03321.70.15 ± 0.050.120638.52 ± 3.19641.843
5B 321.24 ± 0.04321.70.14 ± 0.060.119640.39 ± 3.59641.945
6 321.65 ± 0.02322.20.16 ± 0.060.116640.57 ± 4.10642.929

The calculated νQ frequencies were obtained using eqn (1) and the corresponding calculated values of η and CQ.

Measured from the 81Br nutation NQR spectra.

The calculated νQ frequencies were obtained using eqn (1) and the corresponding calculated η and CQ values. Measured from the 81Br nutation NQR spectra. The calculated νQ frequencies were obtained using eqn (1) and the corresponding calculated values of η and CQ. Measured from the 81Br nutation NQR spectra. The search for the NQR resonances over the amplifier frequency range was the only time-determining step: once the resonance has been found, an excellent signal-to-noise ratio is achieved in about one minute on approximately 200 mg of sample. The signal frequency is characteristic of the local electronic environment at the bromine nucleus; hence, it provides direct information on the halogen bond. To the best of our knowledge, only a handful of data has been published in the literature regarding the characterization of the halogen bond by 81Br NQR.48 As shown in Fig. 2, the 79Br and 81Br NQR frequencies shift towards a higher frequency upon the formation of a halogen bond. As a general trend for the compounds studied herein, the shorter the halogen bond, the greater the shift (vide infra). This is consistent with previous 81Br NQR results on Br···N adducts.48 Notably, both 79Br and 81Br NQR provide clear differentiation between the two crystallographically inequivalent Br sites in compounds 4 and 5 (sites A and B), with the site assignments aided by DFT calculations. Importantly, in previous work on the C–Br···N motif, neither 15N SSNMR of the halogen bond acceptor nor 13C SSNMR of the halogen bond donor were able to discriminate two crystallographic sites.26 Additionally, due to the large quadrupole moments of 79Br and 81Br, the NQR frequencies are very sensitive to subtle changes in the crystallographic environment. For instance, a 3.41 ± 0.03 MHz difference is observed between the 79Br NQR frequencies of sites 4A and 4B, with a difference of 0.101 Å in dBr···N. In addition, comparing the two bromine sites in the X-ray crystal structure of 5 reveals a subtle difference of 0.016 Å in the dBr···N between site 5A and 5B, while the value of θC–Br···N differs by merely 1.88°. Despite these very small geometrical differences, a clear and unambiguous difference of 0.79 ± 0.05 MHz is measured between the two 79Br NQR frequencies. In contrast, a 13C SSNMR analysis of these halogen-bonded compounds did not resolve the two crystallographically independent 13C sites due to residual dipolar coupling to both bromine isotopes (see ESI†). For spin-3/2 nuclides such as 79/81Br, the pure one-dimensional NQR spectrum yields a single frequency which is related to the product of CQ and η (see eqn (1)). In order to extract the individual EFG tensor components, several experimental methods have been proposed, such as Zeeman-perturbed NQR,49 nutation NQR,50,51 and level-crossing double resonance.52 Among these techniques, nutation NQR does not require a complex experimental setup, allowing for the determination of the quadrupolar asymmetry parameter in a straightforward manner. Implemented as a two-dimensional experiment, nutation NQR involves recording series of spectra where the pulse lengths are increased between each one-dimensional spectrum. This experiment allows for the observation of the orientation dependence of the quadrupolar interaction relative to the radiofrequency field. The result allows the measurement of η, which can then be used to determine the value of CQ.50 The highest intensity one-dimensional slices from the two-dimensional experimental 81Br nutation NQR spectra are shown in Fig. 3. Although a stronger RF field may improve the spectral line shapes, our home-built probe is limited to lower power levels. However, using the equation and method proposed for a spin-3/2 nucleus by Harbison,50,51 the experimental NQR line shapes have provided η values in agreement with the DFT calculated results (Tables 2 and 3). Confirmation bias was accounted for by measuring the maximum and minimum separation of the spectral singularities, thereby providing error limits on η. After measuring η by 81Br nutation NQR, the values of CQ for both isotopes were calculated using eqn (1), as both isotopes share the same η value. The CQ values obtained for 79Br and 81Br are related by a ratio of 1.19, further confirming the experimental results. The DFT results are in good agreement with the experimental results, both in terms of η and CQ. Although the experimental and calculated CQ data are close, the DFT results are systematically larger. While dispersion corrections were used in the calculations, the calculated CQ values were not as strongly correlated to the halogen bond geometry as were the experimental data (Fig. 4). For instance, the experimental CQ(79Br) values show an average increase of about 18 MHz upon halogen bond formation, whereas the calculated results suggest an average increase of only 10 MHz.
Fig. 4

Plot of the experimental 81Br CQ (a), calculated 81Br CQ (b), experimental 79Br CQ (c), and calculated 79Br CQ (d) as a function of the Br···N halogen bond length. The lines of best fit and Pearson's correlation coefficients are: (a) CQ = [–36.63 ± 4.41]dBr···N + [639.45 ± 13.22], and R2 = 0.920; (b) CQ = [–17.32 ± 4.03]dBr···N + [587.44 ± 12.09], and R2 = 0.754; (c) CQ = [–43.62 ± 5.14]dBr···N + [764.81 ± 15.42], and R2 = 0.923; (d) CQ = [–20.87 ± 4.84]dBr···N + [703.54 ± 14.52], and R2 = 0.756.

Upon plotting both the experimental and calculated CQ data as a function of the corresponding Br···N halogen bond distances, shown in Fig. 4, good linear correlations are observed. The origin of this effect can be mainly attributed to the interaction between the lone pair electrons from the nitrogen and the bromine atoms, which has historically been referred to as charge transfer. The increase in CQ observed for 79Br and 81Br upon halogen bonding is in agreement with the results for chlorine, obtained from previous 35Cl SSNMR experiments.31 In the case of the bromine halogen bond, CQ increases by 15 to 18 MHz, whereas in the case of chlorine halogen bonds, CQ increases by 0.3 to 1.2 MHz. The 79Br and 81Br NQR observables are remarkably sensitive to the halogen bonding environment, to such an extent that they provide better evidence for the occurrence of a halogen bond compared to the 13C and 15N SSNMR chemical shift of the carbon covalently bonded to iodine, or the nitrogen on the halogen bond acceptor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such a large effect has been observed for bromine atoms involved in halogen bonding.

Conclusions

We have presented the first modern 79/81Br NQR study of halogen bonds, performed on a series of cocrystals based on 1,4-dibromotetrafluorobenzene and the C–Br···N motif. Through a combination of pure NQR and nutation NQR, we have measured both the quadrupolar coupling constant (CQ) and the asymmetry parameter (η). We demonstrate that this approach is sensitive to small changes in the halogen bond geometry, with the CQ in good correlation with the XB length. The sensitivity of the CQ values to the halogen bond geometry proved to be superior to 13C and 15N chemical shifts obtained by solid-state NMR, even allowing for the discrimination of several crystallographically inequivalent halogen bonds. Although the time-determining factor of this technique was the search for the NQR resonances, the reported correlation can be used in future work to narrow the frequency range to be scanned. As NQR is performed in the absence of an applied magnetic field and does not require sophisticated equipment, it can be readily implemented as a tool to characterize the bromine halogen bond, in excellent complementarity with solid-state NMR and diffraction methods.

Experimental

The starting materials were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. Solvents were purchased from Fisher Scientific and used as received. The synthesis of the cocrystal of 1,4-dibromotetrafluorobenzene (1, p-DBrTFB) with acridine (acd) to give 2 ((p-DBrTFB)(acd)), or phenazine (phz) to give 3 ((p-DBrTFB)(phz)), was performed as reported by Jones and collaborators.45 The synthesis of the cocrystal of 1 with 4,4′-bipyridine (bipy) to give 4 ((p-DBrTFB)(bipy)) was performed as reported by De Santis et al.46 The synthesis of the cocrystal of 1 with either 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (dabco) to give 5 ((p-DBrTFB)(dabco)) or piperazine (pip) to give 6 ((p-DBrTFB)(pip)), was performed as reported by Cinčić et al.47 Powder X-ray diffraction and 13C CPMAS SSNMR were carried out to ensure phase purity (see the ESI†). Pulsed 79/81Br NQR experiments were performed in the absence of an applied magnetic field using a Bruker Avance III 400 NMR spectrometer. A home-built probe was used, which consisted of a tuning capacitor, a matching capacitor, and a solenoid. All samples were ground and packed in 4 mm o.d. glass tubes prior to being placed inside the probe's RF coil for NQR analysis. Each spectrum was acquired using a Hahn–Echo pulse sequence (π/2–τ–π–τ–acquire), with a 3 μs π/2 pulse and 6 μs π pulse. A total of 256 or 1024 transients were acquired depending on the signal intensity, with a recycle delay of 0.5 s. In order to search for the NQR frequencies, the applied RF was incremented in steps of 150 kHz. The experimental spectra were fit using QUEST.53 Nutation NQR spectra were recorded as per ref. 50. DC correction was applied to each nutation spectrum. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF) software54 with the metaGGA TPSS55 functional and the TZ2P basis set implemented in ADF. Dispersion forces were accounted for using Grimme3 BJDAMP.56 Scalar and spin–orbit relativistic effects were accounted for using ZORA57 as implemented in the ADF software.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare. Click here for additional data file.
  25 in total

1.  Revealing molecular self-assembly and geometry of non-covalent halogen bonding by solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Markus Weingarth; Noureddine Raouafi; Benjamin Jouvelet; Luminita Duma; Geoffrey Bodenhausen; Khaled Boujlel; Bernd Schöllhorn; Piotr Tekely
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory.

Authors:  Stefan Grimme; Stephan Ehrlich; Lars Goerigk
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Halogen bonding: a general route in anion recognition and coordination.

Authors:  Gabriella Cavallo; Pierangelo Metrangolo; Tullio Pilati; Giuseppe Resnati; Maurizio Sansotera; Giancarlo Terraneo
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Halogen bond tunability I: the effects of aromatic fluorine substitution on the strengths of halogen-bonding interactions involving chlorine, bromine, and iodine.

Authors:  Kevin E Riley; Jane S Murray; Jindřich Fanfrlík; Jan Rezáč; Ricardo J Solá; Monica C Concha; Felix M Ramos; Peter Politzer
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Halogen bonds in crystal engineering: like hydrogen bonds yet different.

Authors:  Arijit Mukherjee; Srinu Tothadi; Gautam R Desiraju
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  Halogen bonding: the sigma-hole. Proceedings of "Modeling interactions in biomolecules II", Prague, September 5th-9th, 2005.

Authors:  Timothy Clark; Matthias Hennemann; Jane S Murray; Peter Politzer
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Halogen bonding in supramolecular chemistry.

Authors:  Pierangelo Metrangolo; Franck Meyer; Tullio Pilati; Giuseppe Resnati; Giancarlo Terraneo
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Halogen bonding: an interim discussion.

Authors:  Peter Politzer; Jane S Murray
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 9.  The Halogen Bond.

Authors:  Gabriella Cavallo; Pierangelo Metrangolo; Roberto Milani; Tullio Pilati; Arri Priimagi; Giuseppe Resnati; Giancarlo Terraneo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  The halogen bond with isocyano carbon reduces isocyanide odor.

Authors:  Alexander S Mikherdov; Alexander S Novikov; Vadim P Boyarskiy; Vadim Yu Kukushkin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.