Literature DB >> 29899591

3D Printed Cardiovascular Patient Specific Phantoms Used for Clinical Validation of a CT-derived FFR Diagnostic Software.

Kelsey N Sommer1,2, Lauren Shepard1,2, Nitant Vivek Karkhanis1,2, Vijay Iyer2,3, Erin Angel4, Michael F Wilson2,3, Frank J Rybicki5, Dimitrios Mitsouras6, Stephen Rudin1,2, Ciprian N Ionita1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: 3D printed patient specific vascular models provide the ability to perform precise and repeatable benchtop experiments with simulated physiological blood flow conditions. This approach can be applied to CT-derived patient geometries to determine coronary flow related parameters such as Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR). To demonstrate the utility of this approach we compared bench-top results with non-invasive CT-derived FFR software based on a computational fluid dynamics algorithm and catheter based FFR measurements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients for whom catheter angiography was clinically indicated signed written informed consent to CT Angiography (CTA) before their standard care that included coronary angiography (ICA) and conventional FFR (Angio-FFR). The research CTA was used first to determine CT-derived FFR (Vital Images) and second to generate patient specific 3D printed models of the aortic root and three main coronary arteries that were connected to a programmable pulsatile pump. Benchtop FFR was derived from pressures measured proximal and distal to coronary stenosis using pressure transducers.
RESULTS: All 12 patients completed the clinical study without any complication, and the three FFR techniques (Angio-FFR, CT-FFR, and Benchtop FFR) are reported for one or two main coronary arteries. The Pearson correlation among Benchtop FFR/Angio-FFR, CT-FFR/ Benchtop FFR, and CT-FFR/ Angio-FFR are 0.871, 0.877, and 0.927 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D printed patient specific cardiovascular models successfully simulated hyperemic blood flow conditions, matching invasive Angio-FFR measurements. This benchtop flow system could be used to validate CT-derived FFR diagnostic software, alleviating both cost and risk during invasive procedures.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29899591      PMCID: PMC5994607          DOI: 10.1117/12.2292736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part I--Pathophysiological and pharmacological features.

Authors:  A I Qureshi; A R Luft; M Sharma; L R Guterman; L N Hopkins
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  3D Printed Cardiac Phantom for Procedural Planning of a Transcatheter Native Mitral Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Richard L Izzo; Ryan P O'Hara; Vijay Iyer; Rose Hansen; Karen M Meess; S V Setlur Nagesh; Stephen Rudin; Adnan H Siddiqui; Michael Springer; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-04-05

3.  Design Optimization for Accurate Flow Simulations in 3D Printed Vascular Phantoms Derived from Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Kelsey Sommer; Richard L Izzo; Lauren Shepard; Alexander R Podgorsak; Stephen Rudin; Adnan H Siddiqui; Michael F Wilson; Erin Angel; Zaid Said; Michael Springer; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-13

4.  Initial Simulated FFR Investigation Using Flow Measurements in Patient-specific 3D Printed Coronary Phantoms.

Authors:  Lauren Shepard; Kelsey Sommer; Richard Izzo; Alexander Podgorsak; Michael Wilson; Zaid Said; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Stephen Rudin; Erin Angel; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-13

5.  Advanced 3D Mesh Manipulation in Stereolithographic Files and Post-Print Processing for the Manufacturing of Patient-Specific Vascular Flow Phantoms.

Authors:  Ryan P O'Hara; Arpita Chand; Sowmya Vidiyala; Stacie M Arechavala; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Stephen Rudin; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-25

6.  Quantitative coronary arteriography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation.

Authors:  B G Brown; E Bolson; M Frimer; H T Dodge
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Treatment Planning for Image-Guided Neuro-Vascular Interventions Using Patient-Specific 3D Printed Phantoms.

Authors:  M Russ; R O'Hara; S V Setlur Nagesh; M Mokin; C Jimenez; A Siddiqui; D Bednarek; S Rudin; C Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-19

8.  Challenges and limitations of patient-specific vascular phantom fabrication using 3D Polyjet printing.

Authors:  Ciprian N Ionita; Maxim Mokin; Nicole Varble; Daniel R Bednarek; Jianping Xiang; Kenneth V Snyder; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy; Hui Meng; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-13
  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Initial evaluation of three-dimensionally printed patient-specific coronary phantoms for CT-FFR software validation.

Authors:  Lauren M Shepard; Kelsey N Sommer; Erin Angel; Vijay Iyer; Michael F Wilson; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Sabee Molloi; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-03-12

2.  2D vessel contrast dilution gradient (CDG) analysis using 1000 fps high speed angiography (HSA) for velocity distribution estimation.

Authors:  Kyle A Williams; Allison Shields; S V Setlur Nagesh; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

3.  Evaluation of challenges and limitations of mechanical thrombectomy using 3D printed neurovascular phantoms.

Authors:  Kelsey N Sommer; Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani; Maxim Mokin; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-02-15

4.  Challenges in hemodynamics assessment in complex neurovascular geometries using computational fluid dynamics and benchtop flow simulation in 3D printed patient specific phantoms.

Authors:  Eric Paccione; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 5.  3D Printing for Cardiovascular Applications: From End-to-End Processes to Emerging Developments.

Authors:  Ramtin Gharleghi; Claire A Dessalles; Ronil Lal; Sinead McCraith; Kiran Sarathy; Nigel Jepson; James Otton; Abdul I Barakat; Susann Beier
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 6.  Innovative Modeling Techniques and 3D Printing in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Bridge from Bench to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Rishi Thaker; Raquel Araujo-Gutierrez; Hernan G Marcos-Abdala; Tanushree Agrawal; Nadia Fida; Mahwash Kassi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Comparison of fluid dynamics changes due to physical activity in 3D printed patient specific coronary phantoms with the Windkessel equivalent model of coronary flow.

Authors:  Kelsey N Sommer; Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani; Vijay Iyer; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2022-04-07

8.  Development of Custom Wall-Less Cardiovascular Flow Phantoms with Tissue-Mimicking Gel.

Authors:  Megan E Laughlin; Sam E Stephens; Jamie A Hestekin; Morten O Jensen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.495

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.