Shinya Sato1,2, Satoshi Maki3, Takashi Yamanaka4, Daisuke Hoshino5, Yukihide Ota6, Emi Yoshioka7, Kae Kawachi7, Kota Washimi7, Masaki Suzuki7, Yoichiro Ohkubo7, Tomoyuki Yokose7, Toshinari Yamashita4, Seiji Ohtori3, Yohei Miyagi6. 1. Molecular Pathology and Genetics Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan. ssato53@gancen.asahi.yokohama.jp. 2. Department of Pathology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan. ssato53@gancen.asahi.yokohama.jp. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. 4. Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan. 5. Department of Cancer Biology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama, Japan. 6. Molecular Pathology and Genetics Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515, Japan. 7. Department of Pathology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Diagnosis of breast preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions is difficult due to their similar morphology in breast biopsy specimens. To diagnose these lesions, pathologists perform immunohistochemical analysis and consult with expert breast pathologists. These additional examinations are time-consuming and expensive. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis has recently improved, and may help in ordinal pathological diagnosis. Here, we showed the significance of machine learning-based image analysis of breast preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions for facilitating high-throughput diagnosis. METHODS: Images were obtained from normal mammary glands, hyperplastic lesions, preneoplastic lesions and neoplastic lesions, such as usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), columnar cell lesion (CCL), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and DCIS with comedo necrosis (comedo DCIS) in breast biopsy specimens. The original enhanced convoluted neural network (CNN) system was used for analyzing the pathological images. RESULTS: The AI-based image analysis provided the following area under the curve values (AUC): normal lesion versus DCIS, 0.9902; DCIS versus comedo DCIS, 0.9942; normal lesion versus CCL, 0.9786; and UDH versus DCIS, 1.000. Multiple comparison analysis showed precision and recall scores similar to those of single comparison analysis. Based on the gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) used to visualize the important regions reflecting the result of CNN analysis, the ratio of stromal tissue in the whole weighted area was significantly higher in UDH and CCL than that in DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses may provide a more accurate and rapid pathological diagnosis of patients. Moreover, Grad-CAM identifies uncharted important histological characteristics for newer pathological findings and targets of research for understanding diseases.
PURPOSE: Diagnosis of breast preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions is difficult due to their similar morphology in breast biopsy specimens. To diagnose these lesions, pathologists perform immunohistochemical analysis and consult with expert breast pathologists. These additional examinations are time-consuming and expensive. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis has recently improved, and may help in ordinal pathological diagnosis. Here, we showed the significance of machine learning-based image analysis of breast preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions for facilitating high-throughput diagnosis. METHODS: Images were obtained from normal mammary glands, hyperplastic lesions, preneoplastic lesions and neoplastic lesions, such as usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), columnar cell lesion (CCL), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and DCIS with comedo necrosis (comedo DCIS) in breast biopsy specimens. The original enhanced convoluted neural network (CNN) system was used for analyzing the pathological images. RESULTS: The AI-based image analysis provided the following area under the curve values (AUC): normal lesion versus DCIS, 0.9902; DCIS versus comedo DCIS, 0.9942; normal lesion versus CCL, 0.9786; and UDH versus DCIS, 1.000. Multiple comparison analysis showed precision and recall scores similar to those of single comparison analysis. Based on the gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) used to visualize the important regions reflecting the result of CNN analysis, the ratio of stromal tissue in the whole weighted area was significantly higher in UDH and CCL than that in DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses may provide a more accurate and rapid pathological diagnosis of patients. Moreover, Grad-CAM identifies uncharted important histological characteristics for newer pathological findings and targets of research for understanding diseases.
Authors: Lynn J Howie; Harpreet Singh; Erik Bloomquist; Suparna Wedam; Laleh Amiri-Kordestani; Shenghui Tang; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Jacqueline Sanchez; Tatiana M Prowell; Paul G Kluetz; Belinda L King-Kallimanis; Jennifer J Gao; Amna Ibrahim; Kirsten B Goldberg; Marc Theoret; Richard Pazdur; Julia A Beaver Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Kyle J Foreman; Allyne M Delossantos; Rafael Lozano; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Mohsen Naghavi Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Martín; S Loibl; T Hyslop; J De la Haba-Rodríguez; B Aktas; C T Cirrincione; K Mehta; W T Barry; S Morales; L A Carey; J A Garcia-Saenz; A Partridge; N Martinez-Jañez; O Hahn; E Winer; A Guerrero-Zotano; C Hudis; M Casas; C Rodriguez-Martin; J Furlanetto; E Carrasco; M N Dickler Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Werner Boecker; Göran Stenman; Tina Schroeder; Udo Schumacher; Thomas Loening; Lisa Stahnke; Catharina Löhnert; Robert Michael Siering; Arthur Kuper; Vera Samoilova; Markus Tiemann; Eberhard Korsching; Igor Buchwalow Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Maura N Dickler; William T Barry; Constance T Cirrincione; Matthew J Ellis; Mary Ellen Moynahan; Federico Innocenti; Arti Hurria; Hope S Rugo; Diana E Lake; Olwen Hahn; Bryan P Schneider; Debasish Tripathy; Lisa A Carey; Eric P Winer; Clifford A Hudis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 44.544