Literature DB >> 29897481

Association Between Autologous Stem Cell Transplant and Survival Among Californians With Multiple Myeloma.

Aaron S Rosenberg1,2, Ann Brunson1, Brian A Jonas1,2,3, Theresa H M Keegan1,2, Ted Wun1,2,3.   

Abstract

Background: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHSCT) is an efficacious treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. However, as rapid advances have resulted in other highly efficacious and less intensive therapies, the role of aHSCT has been questioned.
Methods: We utilized population-based data to identify 13 494 newly diagnosed patients younger than age 80 years between 1998 and 2012. Patient characteristics of aHSCT and non-aHSCT groups were balanced using inverse probability weighting of a propensity score predicting aHSCT use. Multivariable models adjusted for baseline comorbidities, demographics, and socioeconomic status estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of death.
Results: Twenty point eight percent (2807) of patients underwent aHSCT, and this rate increased over time from 15.4% in 1998-2002 to 23.9% in 2008-2012. aHSCT was utilized among 37.6% and 11.5% of patients younger than age 60 years and 60 to 79 years, respectively. The median time to aHSCT was 9.4 months, and 89% of all aHSCTs occurred within two years of diagnosis. The median overall survival from time of aHSCT was 72.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68 to 78). Autologous HSCT at any time was associated with improved survival (aHR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.92). Among aHSCT recipients, transplant more than 12 months after diagnosis (vs ≤12 months) was associated with worse survival (aHR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.51). The positive effect of aHSCT on overall survival was similar across study time periods and age groups.
Conclusion: In the era of highly efficacious induction therapies, aHSCT remained infrequently used but continued to be associated with improved survival for multiple myeloma patients and should be considered for newly diagnosed patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 29897481      PMCID: PMC6335109          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  32 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups.

Authors:  K Yost; C Perkins; R Cohen; C Morris; W Wright
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Early versus delayed autologous transplantation after immunomodulatory agents-based induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Francis K Buadi; Suzanne R Hayman; David Dingli; Francesca Gay; Shirshendu Sinha; Nelson Leung; William Hogan; S Vincent Rajkumar; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Understanding and enhancing the value of hospital discharge data.

Authors:  Julie A Schoenman; Janet P Sutton; Anne Elixhauser; Denise Love
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes.

Authors:  Linda E Lévesque; James A Hanley; Abbas Kezouh; Samy Suissa
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-12

Review 5.  Issues regarding 'immortal time' in the analysis of the treatment effects in observational studies.

Authors:  Jiannong Liu; Eric D Weinhandl; David T Gilbertson; Allan J Collins; Wendy L St Peter
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J Anthony Child; Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Roger G Owen; Susan E Bell; Kim Hawkins; Julia Brown; Mark T Drayson; Peter J Selby
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Combining information from cancer registry and medical records data to improve analyses of adjuvant cancer therapies.

Authors:  Yulei He; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; S Vincent Rajkumar; Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; Francis K Buadi; Steven R Zeldenrust; David Dingli; Stephen J Russell; John A Lust; Philip R Greipp; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Early versus delayed autologous stem cell transplant in patients receiving novel therapies for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Neil C Dunavin; Lai Wei; Patrick Elder; Gary S Phillips; Don M Benson; Craig C Hofmeister; Sam Penza; Carli Greenfield; Karen S Rose; Gisele Rieser; Lisa Merritt; Jill Ketcham; Nyla Heerema; John C Byrd; Steven M Devine; Yvonne A Efebera
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2012-12-31

Review 10.  Survival analysis part I: basic concepts and first analyses.

Authors:  T G Clark; M J Bradburn; S B Love; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Current diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment paradigms in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Gayathri Ravi; Wilson I Gonsalves
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res Commun       Date:  2021-08-04

2.  Real-world utilisation of ASCT in multiple myeloma (MM): a report from the Australian and New Zealand myeloma and related diseases registry (MRDR).

Authors:  Krystal Bergin; Cameron Wellard; Bradley Augustson; Rachel Cooke; Hilary Blacklock; Simon J Harrison; Joy Ho; Tracy King; Hang Quach; Peter Mollee; Patricia Walker; Elizabeth Moore; Zoe McQuilten; Erica Wood; Andrew Spencer
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Socioeconomic Status is Globally a Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Synthesis of Studies and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Stergios Intzes; Marianthi Symeonidou; Konstantinos Zagoridis; Zoe Bezirgianidou; Georgios Vrachiolias; Athina Spanoudaki; Emmanouil Spanoudakis
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.576

4.  Effect of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant on the development of second primary malignancies in multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  A S Rosenberg; A Brunson; J Tuscano; B A Jonas; R Hoeg; T Wun; T H M Keegan
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 11.037

5.  Front-line treatment patterns in multiple myeloma: An analysis of U.S.-based electronic health records from 2011 to 2019.

Authors:  Shaji Kumar; Mellissa Williamson; Uzor Ogbu; Andy Surinach; Stella Arndorfer; Wan-Jen Hong
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Multiple myeloma, race, insurance and treatment.

Authors:  Himanshu Joshi; Sylvia Lin; Kezhen Fei; Anne S Renteria; Hannah Jacobs; Madhu Mazumdar; Sundar Jagannath; Nina A Bickell
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.890

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.