Literature DB >> 34011965

Real-world utilisation of ASCT in multiple myeloma (MM): a report from the Australian and New Zealand myeloma and related diseases registry (MRDR).

Krystal Bergin1, Cameron Wellard2, Bradley Augustson3, Rachel Cooke4, Hilary Blacklock5, Simon J Harrison6,7, Joy Ho8, Tracy King8, Hang Quach9, Peter Mollee10, Patricia Walker11, Elizabeth Moore2, Zoe McQuilten2, Erica Wood2, Andrew Spencer12.   

Abstract

Supported by clinical trial proven survival benefit, clinical guidelines recommend upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for eligible MM patients. However, reported real-world utilisation is lower than expected (40-60%). We reviewed ASCT utilisation, demographics and outcomes for MM patients (≤70 years, ≥12-month follow-up) enroled onto the Australian/New Zealand MRDR from June 2012 to May 2020. In 982 patients (<65 years: 684, 65-70 years: 298), ASCT utilisation was 76% overall (<65 years: 83%, 65-70 years: 61%, front-line therapy: 67%). Non-ASCT recipients were older (median age: 65 years vs 60 years, p < 0.001), had more comorbidities (cardiac disease: 16.9% vs 5.4%, p < 0.001; diabetes: 19.1% vs 7.0%, p < 0.001; renal dysfunction: median eGFR(ml/min): 68 vs 80, p < 0.001), inferior performance status (ECOG ≥ 2: 26% vs 13%, p < 0.001) and higher-risk MM (ISS-3: 37% vs 26%, p = 0.009, R-ISS-3 18.6% vs 11.8%, p = 0.051) than ASCT recipients. ASCT survival benefit (median progression-free survival (PFS): 45.3 months vs 35.2 months, p < 0.001; overall survival (OS): NR vs 64.0 months, p < 0.001) was maintained irrespective of age (<65 years: median PFS: 45.3 months vs 37.7 months, p = 0.04, OS: NR vs 68.2 months, p = 0.002; 65-70 years: median PFS: 46.7 months vs 29.2 months, p < 0.001, OS: 76.9 months vs 55.6 months, p = 0.005). This large, real-world cohort reaffirms ASCT survival benefit, including in 'older' patients necessitating well-designed studies evaluating ASCT in 'older' MM to inform evidence-based patient selection.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34011965     DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01308-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  39 in total

Review 1.  Proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma: 10 years later.

Authors:  Philippe Moreau; Paul G Richardson; Michele Cavo; Robert Z Orlowski; Jesús F San Miguel; Antonio Palumbo; Jean-Luc Harousseau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Novel Immunotherapies for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Mattia D'Agostino; Mario Boccadoro; Eric L Smith
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  History of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; David P Steensma
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2011

4.  A novel BCMA/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager for the treatment of multiple myeloma induces selective lysis in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  S Hipp; Y-T Tai; D Blanset; P Deegen; J Wahl; O Thomas; B Rattel; P J Adam; K C Anderson; M Friedrich
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J Anthony Child; Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Roger G Owen; Susan E Bell; Kim Hawkins; Julia Brown; Mark T Drayson; Peter J Selby
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Français du Myélome.

Authors:  M Attal; J L Harousseau; A M Stoppa; J J Sotto; J G Fuzibet; J F Rossi; P Casassus; H Maisonneuve; T Facon; N Ifrah; C Payen; R Bataille
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Investigational agents in immunotherapy: a new horizon for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Cindy Varga; Jacob P Laubach; Kenneth C Anderson; Paul G Richardson
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  Immunotherapy based on bispecific T-cell engager with hIgG1 Fc sequence as a new therapeutic strategy in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jianxuan Zou; Dan Chen; Yunhui Zong; Sisi Ye; Jinle Tang; Huimin Meng; Gangli An; Xingding Zhang; Lin Yang
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 6.716

9.  Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients.

Authors:  S K Kumar; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; M A Gertz; F K Buadi; S Pandey; P Kapoor; D Dingli; S R Hayman; N Leung; J Lust; A McCurdy; S J Russell; S R Zeldenrust; R A Kyle; S V Rajkumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 10.  Novel agents in the treatment of multiple myeloma: a review about the future.

Authors:  Leonard Naymagon; Maher Abdul-Hay
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 17.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.