Literature DB >> 19210743

Combining information from cancer registry and medical records data to improve analyses of adjuvant cancer therapies.

Yulei He1, Alan M Zaslavsky.   

Abstract

Cancer registry records contain valuable data on provision of adjuvant therapies for cancer patients. Previous studies, however, have shown that these therapies are underreported in registry systems. Hence direct use of the registry data may lead to invalid analysis results. We propose first to impute correct treatment status, borrowing information from an additional source such as medical records data collected in a validation sample, and then to analyze the multiply imputed data, as in Yucel and Zaslavsky (2005, Journal of the American Statistical Association 100, 1123-1132). We extend their models to multiple therapies using multivariate probit models with random effects. Our model takes into account the associations among different therapies in both administration and probability of reporting, as well as the multilevel structure (patients clustered within hospitals) of registry data. We use Gibbs sampling to estimate model parameters and impute treatment status. The proposed methodology is applied to the data from the Quality of Cancer Care project, in which stage II or III colorectal cancer patients were eligible to receive adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19210743      PMCID: PMC2832598          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01164.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

1.  Understanding cancer treatment and outcomes: the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Robert H Fletcher; Mona N Fouad; David P Harrington; Katherine L Kahn; Catarina I Kiefe; Joseph Lipscomb; Jennifer L Malin; Arnold L Potosky; Dawn T Provenzale; Robert S Sandler; Michelle van Ryn; Robert B Wallace; Jane C Weeks; Dee W West
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  NIH consensus conference. Adjuvant therapy for patients with colon and rectal cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-09-19       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Data sources for measuring comorbidity: a comparison of hospital records and medicare claims for cancer patients.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Linda C Harlan; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Profiling providers on use of adjuvant chemotherapy by combining cancer registry and medical record data.

Authors:  Hui Zheng; Recai Yucel; John Z Ayanian; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Determining the quality of breast cancer care: do tumor registries measure up?

Authors:  N A Bickell; M R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for colorectal cancer in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Alan M Zaslavsky; Charles S Fuchs; Edward Guadagnoli; Cynthia M Creech; Rosemary D Cress; Lilia C O'Connor; Dee W West; Mark E Allen; Robert E Wolf; William E Wright
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malin; Katherine L Kahn; John Adams; Lorna Kwan; Marianne Laouri; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Completeness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registries.

Authors:  Rosemary D Cress; Alan M Zaslavsky; Dee W West; Robert E Wolf; Martha C Felter; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Measuring the quality of diabetes care using administrative data: is there bias?

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Bruce E Landon; John Z Ayanian; Catherine Borbas; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Birth rates after radioactive iodine treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Chelsea Anderson; Stephanie M Engel; Mark A Weaver; Jose P Zevallos; Hazel B Nichols
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Combining information from two data sources with misreporting and incompleteness to assess hospice-use among cancer patients: a multiple imputation approach.

Authors:  Yulei He; Mary Beth Landrum; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Association Between Autologous Stem Cell Transplant and Survival Among Californians With Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Aaron S Rosenberg; Ann Brunson; Brian A Jonas; Theresa H M Keegan; Ted Wun
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Fitting dynamic models with forcing functions: application to continuous glucose monitoring in insulin therapy.

Authors:  D J Lunn; C Wei; R Hovorka
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  What is the Best Way to Produce Consensus and Buy in to Guidelines for Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Rebecca K S Wong; James Brierley; Melissa Brouwers
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-03-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.