| Literature DB >> 29896309 |
XiangGuo Lv1, Chao Feng2, YiDong Liu1, XuFeng Peng2, ShiYan Chen3, DongDong Xiao1, HuaPing Wang3, Zhe Li4, YueMin Xu2, MuJun Lu1.
Abstract
Rationale: In urethral tissue engineering, the currently available reconstructive procedures are insufficient due to a lack of appropriate scaffolds that would support the needs of various cell types. To address this problem, we developed a bilayer scaffold comprising a microporous network of silk fibroin (SF) and a nanoporous bacterial cellulose (BC) scaffold and evaluated its feasibility and potential for long-segment urethral regeneration in a dog model.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial cellulose; bilayer scaffold; lingual keratinocytes; muscle cells; silk fibroin; urethral reconstruction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29896309 PMCID: PMC5996367 DOI: 10.7150/thno.22080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 5(A-F) During the surgical procedure in a dog model, the urethra between the bladder and the pubic symphysis was exposed, and a 5 cm long urethra section was transected and removed. Then, the scaffold was sutured onto the urethral defect. (G-L) Comparison of urethrography images in each group at 1 and 3 months after operation. The arrow indicates the urethroplasty site of the urethra.
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the biosynthesis of bilayer SF-BC composites and the experimental design to fabricate TE urethra.
Figure 2Structural and mechanical analyses of the SF-BC scaffold. (A) Digital photographs of the SF-BC scaffold. (B) Cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the SF-BC scaffold. (C-E) Representative SEM images of the architectures in the dense layer. (F-H) Representative SEM images of the architectures in the porous layer.
The medium thickness, porosity, pore size and the nanofiber diameter of the SF-BC bilayer scaffold.
| Bilayer scaffold thickness | Porsity | Nanofiber diameter of nanotextured surface | Pore size of microporous scaffold |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.4±0.52 mm | 85±5.8 % | 46.7±6.7 nm | 210.2±117.8 μm |
The Young's modulus, stress and strain at break and suture-retention strength of SF-BC bilayer scaffold.
| Sample code | Stress at break (KPa) | Strain at break (%) | Young's modulus (MPa) | Suture retention strength (N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF-BC | 274.6±15.4 | 15.7±1.4 | 6.85±0.26 | 1.45±0.21 |
Figure 3(A) MTT results from proliferation assays using lingual keratinocytes. (B) MTT results from proliferation assays using lingual muscle cells. The lingual keratinocytes and muscle cells grew well in the medium containing SF-BC, and the OD values in the scaffold groups were similar to those in the control group.
Figure 4In vitro incubation of engineered urethral tissue. (A, C) Immunofluorescence staining of lingual keratinocytes and muscle cells. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of the SF-BC scaffold with DAPI. (D) Immunofluorescence staining of a cross-section of a cell-seeded SF-BC scaffold. (E) Immunofluorescence staining demonstrating that keratinocytes formed a compact confluent keratinocyte layer. (F) Immunofluorescence staining demonstrating that muscle cells invaded the SF-BC scaffold and dispersed throughout the porous polymer. (G-I) SEM analysis of keratinocytes on the compact surface of the SF-BC scaffold. (J-L) SEM analysis of muscle cells located inside the porous network that had grown along the SF wall. The white arrow indicates the cells, the yellow arrow indicates the nanofiber and the red arrow indicates the SF.
Figure 6Histologic analysis of reconstructed urethras at one and three months post-implantation. Evaluation of epithelium, smooth muscle and vessels with AE1/AE3, desmin and factor VIII immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in the retrieved urethra; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin.