Literature DB >> 26033977

Comparative study of different seeding methods based on a multilayer SIS scaffold: Which is the optimal procedure for urethral tissue engineering?

Xiang-Guo Lv1, Chao Feng1, Qiang Fu1, Hong Xie1, Ying Wang1, Jian-Wen Huang1, Min-Kai Xie1, Anthony Atala2, Yue-Min Xu1, Wei-Xin Zhao2.   

Abstract

Seeding cells efficiently and uniformly onto three-dimensional scaffolds is key for engineering urological tissue with an ideal histological structure in vitro. Using an optimized seeding technology allows cells to cooperate positively with biomaterials, resulting in successful reconstructive surgery. In this study, we used four different types of seeding methods in a scaffold of small intestinal submucosa (SIS). The efficiency of the sandwich co-culture, layered co-culture, static-agitation seeding, and centrifugation seeding methods were compared. It was demonstrated that dynamic seeding methods, such as static-agitation and centrifugation seeding, had superior cell-matrix infiltration and mechanical properties. The seeding time could be reduced by 5-10 min using the centrifugation method. Furthermore, functional assessment of the barriers revealed that this function was better in the centrifugation seeding method than in any other method. Our study suggests that both the static-agitation and centrifugation methods are suitable for cell seeding on SIS. There is no significant change in surface area of SIS with different seeding methods. These methods reinforce the physiological and mechanical properties of biomaterials and allow for the future in vivo study of tissue-engineered urethral reconstruction.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 104B: 1098-1108, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  centrifugation seeding; seeding technology; static-agitation seeding; urethra reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26033977     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  4 in total

Review 1.  Overview of Urethral Reconstruction by Tissue Engineering: Current Strategies, Clinical Status and Future Direction.

Authors:  Zahra Rashidbenam; Mohd Hafidzul Jasman; Pezhman Hafez; Guan Hee Tan; Eng Hong Goh; Xeng Inn Fam; Christopher Chee Kong Ho; Zulkifli Md Zainuddin; Reynu Rajan; Fatimah Mohd Nor; Mohamad Aznan Shuhaili; Nik Ritza Kosai; Farrah Hani Imran; Min Hwei Ng
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 2.  Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Therapy in Pediatric Urology.

Authors:  Shilpa Sharma; Devendra K Gupta
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

3.  A smart bilayered scaffold supporting keratinocytes and muscle cells in micro/nano-scale for urethral reconstruction.

Authors:  XiangGuo Lv; Chao Feng; YiDong Liu; XuFeng Peng; ShiYan Chen; DongDong Xiao; HuaPing Wang; Zhe Li; YueMin Xu; MuJun Lu
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 11.556

4.  Encapsulated three-dimensional bioprinted structure seeded with urothelial cells: a new construction technique for tissue-engineered urinary tract patch.

Authors:  Yi-Peng Jin; Chong Shi; Yuan-Yi Wu; Ji-Lei Sun; Jiang-Ping Gao; Yong Yang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.