| Literature DB >> 30128043 |
XiangGuo Lv1, Chao Feng2, YiDong Liu1, XuFeng Peng2, ShiYan Chen3, DongDong Xiao1, HuaPing Wang3, Zhe Li4, YueMin Xu2, MuJun Lu1.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7150/thno.22080.].Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30128043 PMCID: PMC6096385 DOI: 10.7150/thno.28368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 5(A-F) During the surgical procedure in a dog model, the urethra between the bladder and the pubic symphysis was exposed, and a 5 cm long urethra section was transected and removed. Then, the scaffold was sutured onto the urethral defect. (G-L) Comparison of urethrography images in each group at 3 and 6 months after operation. The arrow indicates the urethroplasty site of the urethra.
Figure 6Histologic analysis of reconstructed urethras at 3 and 6 months post-implantation. Evaluation of epithelium, smooth muscle and vessels with AE1/AE3, desmin and CD31 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in the retrieved urethra; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin.