| Literature DB >> 29895312 |
Wenxiang Chu1,2, Yaokai Gan3,4, Yifu Zhuang1,2, Xin Wang1,2, Jie Zhao1,2, Tingting Tang1,2, Kerong Dai1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Efficacious bone substitute is essential for the treatment of a critical size bone defect. Currently, the bone substitutes commonly used in clinical practice lack osteogenic capacity and the therapeutic efficacy is not ideal. Herein, a novel stem cell screen-enrich-combine(-biomaterials) circulating system (SECCS) was introduced to provide the substitutes with osteogenic ability. The stem cell screening, enrichment, and recombination with substitutes could be integrated during the surgical operation. Using SECCS, the bioactive mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and porous β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) composites (MSCs/β-TCP) were rapidly prepared for critical size bone defect repair and validated in goat models of critical size tibia defects.Entities:
Keywords: Bone regeneration; Critical size bone defects; Enrichment technique; Mesenchymal stem cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29895312 PMCID: PMC5998551 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-0906-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Fig. 1Stem cell screen-enrich-combine(−biomaterials) circulating system (SECCS) for preparing the mesenchymal stem cells and porous β-tricalcium phosphate composites (MSCs/β-TCP) for the treatment of critical size bone defects in the tibia of goats
Fig. 2Evaluation of multilineage differentiation ability of goat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. a Adherent long spindle-shaped cell colonies after 7 days of culture; b Alizarin red staining after 21 days of osteogenic differentiation induction; c Alcian blue staining after 28 days of chondrogenic induction; d Oil red staining after 21 days of adipogenic induction
Fig. 3Enrichment efficiency of SECCS and its effect on cell viability. a,b ALP staining to evaluate MSCs (CFU/ALP+) before and after bone marrow filtration. c,d quantitative analysis of MSCs (c) and nucleated cells (d) before and after bone marrow filtration; e Trypan blue staining to evaluate cell viability before and after filtration
Fig. 4Adherence, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs from mesenchymal stem cells and porous β-tricalcium phosphate composites (MSCS/β-TCP). a Porous β-TCP. b,c Electron micrograph of MSCs/β-TCP cultured for 6 h and 10 days. d Large number of cells spread on the inner wall and surface of β-TCP from MSCs/β-TCP after 10 days of culture. e Cell proliferation in MSCs/β-TCP evaluated by CCK8. f ALP staining for MSCs/β-TCP after 14 days of osteogenic induction. OD optical density
Fig. 5a Critical size bone defect (3 cm) in tibia of goat. b,c MSCs/β-TCP substitute treatment
Fig. 6Images of critical size bone defect in goat tibia. X-ray films of pure β-TCP substitute treatment at a 1 week and b 6 months after the operation. c CT scans of pure β-TCP substitute treatment at 6 months with d 3D reconstruction image. X-ray films of MSCs/β-TCP substitute treatment at e 1 week and f 6 months after the operation. g CT scans of MSCs/β-TCP substitute treatment at 6 months with h 3D reconstruction image
Fig. 7Micro-CT scans of bone defects. a Image of pure porous β-TCP substitute at 6 months postoperation with 3D reconstruction; b–d image of MSCs/β-TCP substitute at 6 months postoperation with 3D reconstruction. The red colored arrow indicates residual β-TCP
Fig. 8Histology and histomorphology evaluation. Van Gieson staining of hard tissue slices 6 months after operation from pure porous β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) treatment (a,b) and mesenchymal stem cells and porous β-tricalcium phosphate composites (MSCs/β-TCP) (c,d) treatment of 3-cm bone defects. Black arrow indicates new Haver’s tube formation. e,f Percentage of new bone area (NBA) and residual β-TCP area (RTA). NB new bone tissues, T residual β-TCP. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01