Literature DB >> 24169864

Bone regeneration potential of allogeneic or autogeneic mesenchymal stem cells loaded onto cancellous bone granules in a rabbit radial defect model.

Soo-Hwan Kang1, Yang-Guk Chung, Il-Hoan Oh, Yong-Sik Kim, Ki-Ouk Min, Jun-Young Chung.   

Abstract

For developing a clinically effective bone regeneration strategy, we compare the bone regeneration potential of cultured allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) and of autologous BM-MSCs loaded onto allogeneic cancellous bone granule scaffolds. A critical-sized segmental bone defect was made at the mid-shaft of both radiuses in 19 New Zealand White rabbits (NWRs). In the experimental group, allogeneic BM-MSCs loaded onto small-sized allogeneic cancellous bone granules (300~700 um in diameter) were implanted in one side of a bone defect. In the control group, autologous BM-MSCs loaded onto allogeneic cancellous granules were grafted in the other side. Bone regeneration was assessed by radiographic evaluation at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks post-implantation and by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histological evaluation at 8 and 16 weeks. The experimental groups showed lower bone quantity indices (BQIs) than the control groups at 12 and 16 weeks (p < 0.05), although no significant difference was observed at 4 and 8 weeks (p > 0.05). Micro-CT analysis revealed that both groups had similar mean total bone volume and other parameters including trabecular thickness, number and separation at either 8 or 16 weeks. Only bone surface area revealed less area in the experimental group at 16 weeks. Histological evaluation of 8-week and 16-week specimens showed similar biologic processes of new bone formation and maturation. There was no inflammatory reaction indicating an adverse immune response in both allogeneic and autologous MSC groups. In conclusion, allogeneic BM-MSCs loaded onto allogeneic cancellous bone granules had comparable bone regeneration potential to autologous BM-MSCs in a rabbit radial defect model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24169864     DOI: 10.1007/s00441-013-1738-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Res        ISSN: 0302-766X            Impact factor:   5.249


  12 in total

Review 1.  Stem and progenitor cells: advancing bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Tevlin; G G Walmsley; O Marecic; Michael S Hu; D C Wan; M T Longaker
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.617

2.  Tissue engineering using 3D printed nano-bioactive glass loaded with NELL1 gene for repairing alveolar bone defects.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yang Chen; Jing Xu; Jingjing Wang; Chengzhang Li; Liyan Wang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2018-07-31

Review 3.  Biomaterial-mediated strategies targeting vascularization for bone repair.

Authors:  José R García; Andrés J García
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics coated with nano-hydroxyapatite and seeded with mesenchymal stem cells for reconstruction of radius segmental defects in rabbits.

Authors:  Jianzhong Hu; Zhiming Yang; Yongchun Zhou; Yong Liu; Kaiyang Li; Hongbin Lu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  The challenges and promises of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for use as a cell-based therapy.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Xiaowen Huang; Haijun Wang; Xiaoyan Liu; Tao Zhang; Yunchuan Wang; Dahai Hu
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 6.  Changes in immunological profile of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells after differentiation: should we be concerned?

Authors:  Paul Lohan; Cynthia M Coleman; J Mary Murphy; Matthew D Griffin; Thomas Ritter; Aideen E Ryan
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.832

7.  Allogeneic Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a Potential Source for Cartilage and Bone Regeneration: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  A Marmotti; S Mattia; F Castoldi; A Barbero; L Mangiavini; D E Bonasia; M Bruzzone; F Dettoni; R Scurati; G M Peretti
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 8.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Xiaokun Gang; Chenglin Sun; Guixia Wang
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 4.011

9.  Fibrin biopolymer as scaffold candidate to treat bone defects in rats.

Authors:  Claudia Vilalva Cassaro; Luis Antonio Justulin; Patrícia Rodrigues de Lima; Marjorie de Assis Golim; Natália Perussi Biscola; Mateus Vidigal de Castro; Alexandre Leite Rodrigues de Oliveira; Danuta Pulz Doiche; Elenize Jamas Pereira; Rui Seabra Ferreira; Benedito Barraviera
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-11-04

10.  Mesenchymal stem cells and porous β-tricalcium phosphate composites prepared through stem cell screen-enrich-combine(-biomaterials) circulating system for the repair of critical size bone defects in goat tibia.

Authors:  Wenxiang Chu; Yaokai Gan; Yifu Zhuang; Xin Wang; Jie Zhao; Tingting Tang; Kerong Dai
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 6.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.