Jing Li1, Feiyue Xing1, Feng Chen2, Liumin He3, Kwok-Fai So4, Yingxia Liu2, Jia Xiao2,4. 1. 1 Department of Immunobiology, Institute of Tissue Transplantation and Immunology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. 2. 2 State Key Discipline of Infectious Diseases, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China. 3. 3 Key Laboratory of Biomaterials of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. 4. 4 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Abstract
The severe shortage of donor liver organs requires the development of alternative methods to provide transplantable liver tissues such as stem cell-derived organoids. Despite several studies describing the generation of vascularized and functional liver tissues, none have succeeded in assembling human liver buds containing hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs). Here, we report a reproducible, easy-to-follow, and comprehensive self-assembly protocol to generate three-dimensional (3D) human liver buds from naïve mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), MSC-derived hepatocytes, and HSC- and LSEC-like cells. By optimizing the ratio between these different cell lineages, the cell mixture self-assembled into 3D human liver buds within 72 h in vitro, and exhibited similar characteristics with early-stage murine liver buds. In a murine model of acute liver failure, the mesenteric transplantation of self-assembled human liver buds effectively rescued animal death, and triggered hepatic ameliorative effects that were better than the ones observed after splenic transplantation of human hepatocytes or naïve MSCs. In addition, transplanted human liver buds underwent maturation during injury alleviation, after which they exhibited a gene expression profile signature similar to the one of adult human livers. Collectively, our protocol provides a promising new approach for the in vitro construction of functional 3D human liver buds from multiple human MSC-derived hepatic cell lineages; this new technique would be useful for clinical transplantation and regenerative medicine research.
The severe shortage of donor liver organs requires the development of alternative methods to provide transplantable liver tissues such as stem cell-derived organoids. Despite several studies describing the generation of vascularized and functional liver tissues, none have succeeded in assembling human liver buds containing hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs). Here, we report a reproducible, easy-to-follow, and comprehensive self-assembly protocol to generate three-dimensional (3D) human liver buds from naïve mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), MSC-derived hepatocytes, and HSC- and LSEC-like cells. By optimizing the ratio between these different cell lineages, the cell mixture self-assembled into 3D human liver buds within 72 h in vitro, and exhibited similar characteristics with early-stage murine liver buds. In a murine model of acute liver failure, the mesenteric transplantation of self-assembled human liver buds effectively rescued animal death, and triggered hepatic ameliorative effects that were better than the ones observed after splenic transplantation of human hepatocytes or naïve MSCs. In addition, transplanted human liver buds underwent maturation during injury alleviation, after which they exhibited a gene expression profile signature similar to the one of adult human livers. Collectively, our protocol provides a promising new approach for the in vitro construction of functional 3D human liver buds from multiple human MSC-derived hepatic cell lineages; this new technique would be useful for clinical transplantation and regenerative medicine research.
Chronic liver disease is characterized by the progressive destruction and declining
regeneration of hepatic tissues, which give rise to the development of fibrosis and possibly
cirrhosis if these damages are not mitigated. It is one of the major causes of mortality
worldwide. In 2013, chronic liver disease and cirrhosis caused 36,427 deaths across all age
groups in the United States[1]. Clinically, liver transplantation is the only definitive treatment for end-stage
liver diseases, including acute liver failure, cirrhosis, and liver cancers[2]. However, the critical shortage of donor liver organs and the severe graft rejections
highlight the urgent need for the generation of liver organs from autologous stem cells,
which have the capacity for self-renewal, immune-regulation, homing instinct, and regeneration[3]. Moreover, stem cell transplantation can overcome the major limitations of direct
hepatocyte transplantation, such as organ availability, limited cell proliferation, loss of
function, and the risk for immune rejection[4].One of the major defects associated with the use of resuspended stem cells or stem
cell-derived hepatocyte injection is the risk for phenotypic and functional deficiencies
(e.g., loss of cellular cuboidal morphology and of liver-specific functions, such as
decreased secretion of albumin and impaired phase I and II enzymatic detoxification
abilities, were frequently observed)[5]. Despite many studies reporting the amelioration of various liver diseases by using
naïve stem cell or stem cell-derived hepatocyte transplantation, including acute liver failure[6], chronic hepatitis B (CHB)[7], chronic hepatitis C (CHC)[8], alcoholic liver disease (ALD)[9], drug-induced liver injury (DILI)[10], primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC)[11], severe cirrhosis[12], and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)[13], few studies have described the generation of functional three-dimensional (3D) liver
buds assembled entirely from stem cells or stem cell-derived liver cells, which could be
directly transplanted to alleviate liver injury and promote liver regeneration[14]. More importantly, no studies have reported the generation of 3D liver buds with
functional hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs). To
facilitate future clinical applications of direct transplantation, in the current study we
aimed to establish a comprehensive and reproducible method to generate functional 3D human
liver buds based on self-condensation mechanisms of different liver cell types derived from
human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). We also validated the transplantation capacity of
self-assembled human liver buds in a model of immunodeficient mice with liver injuries. The
maturation capacity of liver bud transplants was also investigated.
Materials and Methods
Hepatocyte Differentiation
Hepatocyte differentiation from human umbilical cord blood stem cells (hUCBSCs) was
conducted using a StemXVivo Hepatocyte Differentiation Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis,
MN, USA). Briefly, before the induction of differentiation, wells of cell culture plates
were precoated with Cultrex® Stem Cell Qualified Reduced Growth Factor (RGF)
Basement Membrane Extract (BME) (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) for 2 h and then seeded
with hUCBSCs at a density of 1.1–1.25 × 105 cells/cm2 and cultured
in MEF-conditioned media containing basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). hUCBSCs were
sequentially treated with differentiation medium numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 for 5, 4, 4, and 5
days, respectively.
Differentiated Hepatocyte Function Tests
Differentiated hepatocytes were treated with 20 μM beta-naphthoflavone (BNP) for 24 h to
induce cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) expression. Then, cells were incubated for 30 min in
methoxyresorufin, a CYP1A1 substrate that produces the fluorescent metabolite resorufin.
The absorbance of resorufin was detected at 570 nm on a plate reader. To measure the
induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), differentiated hepatocytes were treated with
either 50 µM dexamethasone or 25 µM rifampicin for 48 h. The cellular activity of CYP3A4
was measured by using a P450-Glo CYP3A4 cell-based assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA)
following the manufacturer’s instructions.To further prove the function of differentiated hepatocytes, cells were treated with
acetaminophen (APAP, 1 mM or 10 mM, in ethanol) for 24 h. Normal culture medium with
ethanol was set as the control group. Treated cells were assessed by the Resazurin
metabolism assay (R&D Systems, cat.: AR002), which generated a cumulative increase in
fluorescence over time.
HSCs and LSECs Co-Differentiation
Passage 3 hUCBSCs were seeded at an approximate density of 1 × 105
cells/cm2 and cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with 1 µM
dexamethasone, 0.25× ITS (insulin, transferrin, selenium), and 0.5% FBS (fetal bovine
serum) (all from Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China). The co-differentiation of HSC and LSEC
consisted of a sequential four-step supplementation protocol with the following factors:
(1) from day 1 to day 6: 40 ng/ml Wnt3a and 75 ng/ml Activin A; (2) from day 7 to day 10:
5 ng/ml bFGF and 25 ng/ml bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4); (3) from day 11 to day 14:
25 ng/ml acidic FGF, 5 ng/ml FGF4, and 20 ng/ml FGF8; and (4) from day 15 to day 28: 10
ng/ml hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and 50 ng/ml Follistatin. All supplementation factors
were bought from R&D Systems. Matrigel was not used to precoat the bottom of the
culture plates or wells (i.e., non-coated plates). The cell morphology was recorded every
day for each group. All cell culture methods, including the incubation duration, the
selection and concentration of each supplement, and the coating conditions were optimized
based on our pilot studies. Differentiated HSC- and LSEC-like cells were subsequently
subjected to cell sorting, analysis, and self-assembly.
Flow Cytometry
To sort and analyze HSC-like cells after the induction of hUCBSCs differentiation, cells
were treated for 24 h with 5 μM vitamin A, which is stored in HSC-like cells as retinyl
esters contained in cytosolic lipid droplets[15]. Fluorescent cells [Indo-1 (Violet)-A positive] were analyzed and sorted from the
hUCBSCs/HSCs/LSECs pool by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (BD FACSVerse, BD
Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA)[16]. For LSEC-like cell selection, cells were sorted and analyzed from mixed cultures
by using VE-cadherin or isotype control antibodies (R&D Systems).
Fluorescent Microscopy
After vitamin A incubation, live HSC-like cells containing stored retinyl esters emitted
blue fluorescence under ultraviolet light stimulation, which was detected by inverted
fluorescence microscope IX71 (Olympus Microscope, Tokyo, Japan). Similarly, VE-cadherin
expressing LSEC-like cells were detected by performing immunofluorescence assay. Cells
were fixed with 4% formaldehyde (v/v) at room temperature for 15 min and then
permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 in Tris buffer (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) for another 15
min. To block nonspecific antibody binding sites, cells were treated with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h
at 37°C. Subsequently, cells were incubated in the same solution containing the
VE-cadherin primary antibody (1:100 dilution) for 2 h at room temperature. After three
washes with PBS, cells were incubated for 1 h with the secondary antibody goat anti-mouse
IgG conjugated with FITC (1:1000, Abcam Asia, Hong Kong, China) at room temperature. To
visualize nuclei, cells were counter-stained with Hoechst 33342 (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China)
for 15 min at room temperature. Slides were mounted with fluorescent mounting medium (KPL,
Gaithersburg, MD, USA) before microscope examination.
Self-Assembly of Human Liver Buds from Multiple Cell Lineages
To achieve the self-assembly of human liver buds from multiple cell lineages in
vitro, 1 × 106 differentiated hepatocytes, 0.3 × 106
differentiated HSC-like cells, 0.3 × 106 differentiated LSEC-like cells, and
0.1 × 106 undifferentiated hUCBSCs were resuspended together in DMEM/F-12
medium containing 2.5% FBS, 50 nM dexamethasone, 10 ng/ml Oncostatin M, and 5 ng/ml HGF
and plated on pre-solidified 1 × Matrigel diluted in DMEM/F-12 medium in a 24-well plate.
This optimized cell lineage mixture ratio was determined based on our pilot studies (data
not shown). After approximately 6 days, assembled liver buds were collected for subsequent
validations and transplantations. Self-assembled liver buds, together with liver buds
isolated from embryonic day 10 (E10) C57/BL6 mouse embryos (purchased from Guangdong
Animal Center, Guangzhou, China), were all subjected to frozen sectioning and
immunofluorescence assays using early-stage liver development markers, including CK8/18
(Abcam), AFP (Abcam), CD31 (Abcam), Desmin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), PCNA
(Abcam), Flk1 (Cell Signaling), and BrdU (Cell Signaling).
RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, and Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from stem cells or homogenized tissues using
illustraTM RNAspin mini kit (GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK) and the cDNA was
generated from 2 μg of total RNA using the SuperScriptTM First-Strand Synthesis
System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Synthesized cDNAs were subjected to quantitative
real-time PCR using the Takara SYBR premix Taq quantitative PCR system (Takara Bio Inc.,
Shiga, Japan) and the MyiQ2 real-time PCR machine (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Primer
information and reaction conditions used for our quantitative real-time PCR analysis are
listed in Supplementary Table 1. All quantitative real-time PCR procedures, including the
design of primers, the validation of PCR conditions, and the quantification methods were
performed according to the MIQE guidelines[17].
Microarray Analysis
To characterize and compare the gene expression profiles of self-assembled human liver
buds with those of the corresponding murine developmental stage, we selected 83 genes that
were serially upregulated during both human and mouse liver development (Supplementary
Table 2) using a Whole Human Genome Agilent 4344 K v2 Oligonucleotide Microarray or a
Whole Mouse Genome Agilent 4344 K v2 Oligonucleotide Microarray (Agilent Technologies,
Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, total RNAs
were extracted from self-assembled human liver buds, adult human liver tissues (Biochain
Institute Inc., Newark, CA, USA), or CD45-negative and Ter119-negative murine liver cells
from different developmental stages (E10, E13, E16, E19, postnatal day 0 [P0], and
postnatal day 3 [P3]) and subjected to microarray chip hybridization. A hierarchical
clustering method using Euclidean distance complete linkage on GeneSpring11.5.1 was
carried out to perform cross-species comparison of gene expression profiles as previously described[18]. Similarly, to compare the gene expression profiles of self-assembled liver buds
(with or without transplantation) with healthy adult human liver tissues, 38 signature
genes for mature liver tissues were selected to perform a microarray analysis
(Supplementary Table 3) as described above.
Transplantation
All animal experiments in the current study, including experimental procedures, sample
isolations, and animal care, were approved by and in accordance with the guidelines and
regulations from the ethical committee of Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital (No. 2016-07).
TK-NOG mice, which are mice from a highly immunodeficient strain (NOG) that express the
humanized herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase (TK) transgene in their liver, with
body weights ranging from 20 to 30 g, were purchased from In Vivo Science Inc. (Tokyo,
Japan). Ganciclovir (Sigma-Aldrich), an antiviral medication which is not toxic to human
or mouse tissues, was injected intraperitoneally to induce acute liver failure by
tissue-specific ablation of transgenic liver parenchymal cells 5 and 10 days (50 mg/kg,
one injection at day 5 and one injection at day 10) after the mesenteric transplantation
of 10 in vitro-generated human liver buds. For control studies, 3 ×
106 live hUCBSCs or hUCBSCs-derived hepatocytes resuspended in cold medium or
cold Matrigel (BD Bioscience) respectively were transplanted into the renal subcapsular
space. The mortality rate was recorded for all mice every day. Mouse liver tissues or
transplanted human liver bud tissues were collected at the end of the entire experiment
for immunofluorescence and microarray analyses.
ELISA
Serum was collected from whole-blood samples of mice by centrifugation at 1000 x
g for 10 min at 4°C and stored at –80°C. Serum levels of albumin and alpha 1
antitrypsin (AAT) were measured at days 0, 10, 20, and 30 post-mesenteric or splenic
transplantations by using commercial ELISA kits from Abcam.
Drug Metabolism Activity Tests
To measure the drug metabolism capacity of mice transplanted with artificial liver buds,
ketoprofen or debrisoquine was administered to mice as previously described[18,19]. Briefly, ketoprofen (15 mg/kg in PBS) was intravenously injected to mice at day 30
after 3D liver transplantation. Injection of vehicle PBS was set as the control group.
Urine samples (0–2 h) of mice were collected with 0.5 M acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and 1 N
KOH for a 3 h incubation at 80°C, which was terminated by adding an equivalent volume of 1
N HCl. Then acetonitrile containing 1% acetic acid was added to the mixture and
centrifuged at 4°C, 15,000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was loaded to liquid
chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS, LC-20A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The
mobile phase containing 0.1% acetic acid and 0.1% acetic acid containing acetonitrile was
pumped at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The turbo gas was maintained at 600°C. Ionspray
voltage was –4500 V and analyze m/z transitions (Q1/Q3) for ketoprofen and
1-hydroxyketoprofen were 253.1/209.3 and 269.1/209.3, respectively[18].For the measurement of debrisoquine metabolism, a concentration of 2 mg/kg was orally
administrated to mice at day 30 after transplantation. Blood samples were collected at 8 h
after administration with hepatin-Na. Separated plasma was mixed with the internal
standard (niflumic acid 1 μM) methanol solution and then centrifuged at 4°C, 15,000 rpm
for 5 min. The following LC/MS/MS procedures were similar to that of ketoprofen. The
mobile phase consisting of 10 mM ammonium acetate and acetonitrile was pumped at a flow
rate of 0.8 ml/min. The turbo gas was maintained at 450°C. The ionspray voltage of the
experiment was 5000 V and analyze m/z transitions (Q1/Q3) for debrisoquine,
4-hyroxydebrisoqune, and internal standard were 176.5/134.2, 192.6/132.1, and 283.2/245.4,
respectively. The area under the curve from time 0 until the last measurable plasma
concentration (AUC0–) was calculated using the linear
trapezoidal rule. Metabolic ratios were determined by dividing AUC0-t of
4-hyroxydebrisoqune by AUC0– of debrisoquine.
Statistical Analysis
Data from each group are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons between
groups were done using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test to detect
significant differences. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be
statistically significant (Prism 5.0, Graphpad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Results
Human MSCs were Successfully Differentiated to Functional Hepatocyte-, HSCs, and
LSEC-Like Cells
After 15 d of culture with a four-step differentiation protocol, hUCBSCs were
successfully differentiated into mature human hepatocyte-like cells (Figure 1(a)). The differentiation efficiency was
quantified by flow cytometry analysis of the cell surface hepatocyte marker,
asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 (ASGPR1), which showed that differentiation of hUCBSCs
resulted in approximately 74% of ASGPR1-positive hepatocyte-like cells (Figure 1(b)). After 24 h of incubation
with 20 μM beta-naphthoflavone (BNP), differentiated hepatocyte-like cells were shown to
express the cytochrome P450 enzyme over time (Figure 1(c)). In addition, when hepatocyte-like cells
were treated with either dexamethasone (50 µM) or rifampicin (25 µM) for 48 h, evident
elevation of CYP3A4 activity was observed (Figure 1(d)). We also found that a 24 h incubation
with APAP made hepatocytes reduce metabolic activity, as quantified by a decreased
accumulation of resorufin fluorescence over time (Figure 1(e)). These findings suggest that hUCBSCs
were successfully differentiated into mature human hepatocyte-like cells.
Figure 1.
Functional tests of hepatocytes differentiated from human umbilical cord blood stem
cells (hUCBSCs). (a) Representative cell morphology of naïve MSC and differentiated
hepatocytes. (b) Differentiation efficiency was quantified by flow cytometric
detection of the cell surface hepatocyte protein ASGPR1 (asialoglycoprotein receptor
1, violet histogram). Staining levels were compared to an isotype control antibody
(gray histogram). (c) After a 24 h incubation with 20 μM beta-naphthoflavone (BNP),
the CYP1A1 activity was determined by measuring its substrate substance
7-ethoxyresorufin in hUCBSCs-derived hepatocytes. (d) Hepatocytes were treated with
either 50 µM dexamethasone or 25 µM rifampicin to induce CYP3A4 expression. (e)
Hepatocytes were incubated with 1 mM or 10 mM acetaminophen (APAP) for 24 h.
Accumulation of resorufin fluorescence over time was recorded. Data are presented as
mean ± SEM, and significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by
Dunn’s post hoc test (***P < 0.001). Scale bars, 100 µm.
Functional tests of hepatocytes differentiated from human umbilical cord blood stem
cells (hUCBSCs). (a) Representative cell morphology of naïve MSC and differentiated
hepatocytes. (b) Differentiation efficiency was quantified by flow cytometric
detection of the cell surface hepatocyte protein ASGPR1 (asialoglycoprotein receptor
1, violet histogram). Staining levels were compared to an isotype control antibody
(gray histogram). (c) After a 24 h incubation with 20 μM beta-naphthoflavone (BNP),
the CYP1A1 activity was determined by measuring its substrate substance
7-ethoxyresorufin in hUCBSCs-derived hepatocytes. (d) Hepatocytes were treated with
either 50 µM dexamethasone or 25 µM rifampicin to induce CYP3A4 expression. (e)
Hepatocytes were incubated with 1 mM or 10 mM acetaminophen (APAP) for 24 h.
Accumulation of resorufin fluorescence over time was recorded. Data are presented as
mean ± SEM, and significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by
Dunn’s post hoc test (***P < 0.001). Scale bars, 100 µm.To induce the differentiation of HSCs and LSECs, we optimized a novel 28-day, four-step
co-differentiation protocol that produced HSC- and LSEC-like cells concurrently (Figure 2(a)). The morphological
changes of hUCBSCs undergoing co-differentiation are presented in Figure 2(b), which shows that cells started to gain a
hepatic non-parenchymal morphology at day 9 and exhibited typical HSC- and LSEC-like
shapes by day 23. When cells were cultured with vitamin A and labeled with the VE-cadherin
antibody, flow cytometry showed that the differentiation efficiencies of hUCBSCs into HSC-
or into LSEC-like cells were approximately 21% and 19%, respectively (Figure 2(c,d)). In addition, the detection of blue
fluorescent signals, which revealed the presence of retinyl esters storage in HSC-like
cells (Figure 2(e)), and the
significant upregulation of gene expression levels of HSC markers (ALCAM,
CRBP1, TIMP1, and LOX) in sorted
HSC-like cells both indicated the successful differentiation of “human HSCs” from hUCBSCs.
Similarly, a small portion of the mixed cell population differentiated from hUCBSCs
exhibited green fluorescence when stained with VE-cadherin antibody (Figure 2(g)). Sorted LSEC-like cells also exhibited
significant high gene expression levels of typical LSEC markers (VCAM-1,
MRC-1, and CD31) when compared with those of
undifferentiated hUCBSCs (Figure
2(h)).
Figure 2.
Co-differentiation of hepatic stellate cell (HSC)- and liver sinusoidal endothelial
cell (LSEC)-like cells from human umbilical cord blood stem cells (hUCBSCs). (a)
Protocols of co-differentiation. (b) Changes of cell morphology at days 1, 9, 14, and
23 during co-differentiation from hUCBSCs to HSC- or LSEC-like cells. Dotted line
indicates cells have early-stage morphological changes. Solid arrow indicates HSC-like
cell while hollow arrow indicates LSEC-like cell. (c) HSC-like cells were treated with
vitamin A, that then is stored in stellate cells in the form of retinyl esters in
lipid drops and measured by flow cytometry. Differentiation efficiency of HSC-like
cells was ∼21%. (d) LSEC-like cells were isolated from mixed hUCBSCs/HSC/LSEC cultures
using VE-cadherin antibody. The approximate differentiation efficiency was ∼19%. (e)
Representative images of HSC-like cells held a fluorescent phenotype under UV laser
excitation. (f) RNA was extracted from the Indo-1 (Violet)-A positive cells and
analyzed for HSC gene expressions, including PPARγ,
ALCAM, CRBP1, TIMP1, and
LOX by quantitative real-time PCR. (g) Representative images of
LSEC-like cells stained with VE-cadherin antibody. (h) RNA was extracted from the
VE-cadherin-positive cells and analyzed for LSEC gene expressions, including
VCAM-1, MRC-1, and CD31 by
quantitative real-time PCR. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and significance was
calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test
(***P< 0.001). Scale bars, 100 µm.
Co-differentiation of hepatic stellate cell (HSC)- and liver sinusoidal endothelial
cell (LSEC)-like cells from human umbilical cord blood stem cells (hUCBSCs). (a)
Protocols of co-differentiation. (b) Changes of cell morphology at days 1, 9, 14, and
23 during co-differentiation from hUCBSCs to HSC- or LSEC-like cells. Dotted line
indicates cells have early-stage morphological changes. Solid arrow indicates HSC-like
cell while hollow arrow indicates LSEC-like cell. (c) HSC-like cells were treated with
vitamin A, that then is stored in stellate cells in the form of retinyl esters in
lipid drops and measured by flow cytometry. Differentiation efficiency of HSC-like
cells was ∼21%. (d) LSEC-like cells were isolated from mixed hUCBSCs/HSC/LSEC cultures
using VE-cadherin antibody. The approximate differentiation efficiency was ∼19%. (e)
Representative images of HSC-like cells held a fluorescent phenotype under UV laser
excitation. (f) RNA was extracted from the Indo-1 (Violet)-A positive cells and
analyzed for HSC gene expressions, including PPARγ,
ALCAM, CRBP1, TIMP1, and
LOX by quantitative real-time PCR. (g) Representative images of
LSEC-like cells stained with VE-cadherin antibody. (h) RNA was extracted from the
VE-cadherin-positive cells and analyzed for LSEC gene expressions, including
VCAM-1, MRC-1, and CD31 by
quantitative real-time PCR. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and significance was
calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test
(***P< 0.001). Scale bars, 100 µm.
Self-Assembly of Functional 3D Human Liver Buds from Mixed Cell Lineages
Since the self-assembly of functional 3D liver buds depends on the exquisite
orchestration of signals among parenchymal, endothelial, and epithelial cells[20], this inspired us to generate liver buds in vitro by culturing
hepatocyte-, HSC-, LSEC-like cells, and naïve hUCBSCs together in a 10:3:3:1 ratio for 72
h based on an optimization of the protocol used in our pilot studies (Figure 3(a)). Notably, mixed cell lineages cultured
in 2D started to self-assemble 6 h post-seeding and formed visible 3D clusters
(approximate diameter of 4 mm) 48 h post-seeding by intrinsic capacity for
self-condensation (Figure 3(b)).
After 72 h of culture, the self-assembled liver buds became mechanically stable.
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of these liver buds revealed that early hepatic
markers (e.g., ALB, AFP, and CYP3A7)
were expressed (Figure 3(c)). We
also proved the indispensable roles of those four types of cell (particularly MSC and
LSEC) in the self-assembly of 3D liver buds because lack of MSC or LSEC failed to form
structurally functional clusters (Supplementary Figure 1). Since the formation of liver
buds was initiated on the third or fourth week of gestation, which corresponds
approximately to E10 for murine liver bud formation[21], we compared the protein expression of the hepatoblast marker α-fetoprotein (AFP),
the endothelial progenitor marker (CD31), and the mesenchymal progenitor marker (Desmin)
between in vitro self-assembled human liver buds and E10 mouse liver buds
by immunofluorescence. The relative expression levels and expression patterns between
human and mouse liver buds were quite similar (Figure 3(d)). In addition, the analysis of cell
proliferation also revealed similarities between human and mouse liver buds (Figure 3). To further characterize the
gene expression profile of self-assembled human liver buds compared to those isolated from
the corresponding murine developmental stage, we analyzed 83 genes that were serially
upregulated during both human and mouse liver development by performing a hierarchical
clustering analysis and we found that the gene expression profile of human liver buds
resembled the one of E10 mouse liver buds, rather than mouse livers from advanced fetal or
adult stages (Figure 3(f)).
Collectively, our data suggested that by using a multi-lineage self-assemble strategy,
functional 3D human liver buds were successfully generated.
Figure 3.
Human 3D liver bud assembly and function test from human umbilical cord blood stem
cells (hUCBSCs). (a) Schematic representation of our strategy to assemble human 3D
liver buds from naïve MSC and MSC-derived hepatocytes, HSC-like cells, and LSEC-like
cells. (b) The time-lapse representative images of the self-assembly process. (c)
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of hepatic marker gene expression in human liver
buds at day 3 of culture. (d) Representative images of immunostaining of CK8/18, AFP,
CD31, Flk1, desmin, PCNA, and BrdU from 3D liver bud and mouse embryonic day 10 (E10)
liver bud. Scale bars, 100 µm. (c) Percentage of proliferating hepatic cells
calculated by dividing the number of PCNA/BrdU-positive cells by the number of
CK8/18-positive cells. (d) Comparison of liver developmental gene signature genes
among human liver bud, human adult liver tissue and mouse liver tissue of various
developmental stages (from E10 to 3 weeks after birth). Data are presented as mean ±
SEM, and significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s
post hoc test (***P < 0.001 vs. MSC;
##,###P < 0.01 or 0.001 vs. hepatocytes).
Human 3D liver bud assembly and function test from human umbilical cord blood stem
cells (hUCBSCs). (a) Schematic representation of our strategy to assemble human 3D
liver buds from naïve MSC and MSC-derived hepatocytes, HSC-like cells, and LSEC-like
cells. (b) The time-lapse representative images of the self-assembly process. (c)
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of hepatic marker gene expression in human liver
buds at day 3 of culture. (d) Representative images of immunostaining of CK8/18, AFP,
CD31, Flk1, desmin, PCNA, and BrdU from 3D liver bud and mouse embryonic day 10 (E10)
liver bud. Scale bars, 100 µm. (c) Percentage of proliferating hepatic cells
calculated by dividing the number of PCNA/BrdU-positive cells by the number of
CK8/18-positive cells. (d) Comparison of liver developmental gene signature genes
among human liver bud, human adult liver tissue and mouse liver tissue of various
developmental stages (from E10 to 3 weeks after birth). Data are presented as mean ±
SEM, and significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s
post hoc test (***P < 0.001 vs. MSC;
##,###P < 0.01 or 0.001 vs. hepatocytes).
Transplantation with Self-Assembled Human Liver Buds Ameliorated Murine Hepatic
Injury
To facilitate future clinical application of our self-assembled human liver buds derived
from stem cells, we used a minimal invasive mesenteric transplantation of 10 generated
liver buds in TK-NOG mouse models, as previously described[18,22]. It was shown that 30 days after the concurrent gancyclovir-induced liver failure
and transplantation, the group of mice with transplanted human liver buds had the highest
survival rate (80%), which was superior to those of mice transplanted with human adult
hepatocytes or with hUCBSCs (both 60%) (Figure 4(a)). The levels of human albumin and AAT were also significantly higher
during the entire experimental observation in the human liver bud-transplanted group
compared to those of human adult hepatocyte- or hUCBSCs-transplanted groups (Figure 4(b,c)). To examine the
expression of key functional proteins in transplanted liver buds and in alleviated mouse
livers 30 days post-treatment, immunofluorescence for human ALB and CK8/18 were performed.
In mouse livers transplanted with human MSCs or hepatocytes, the expression of ALB and
CK8/18 were scarce, while in human liver buds their expressions were quite obvious (Figure 4(d)). In addition, we also
tested the drug-metabolizing abilities of mice with or without hepatocyte/MSC/liver bud
transplantation by challenging mice with ketoprofen or debrisoquine, which are known to be
metabolized differently by mice and humans[18,19]. Results showed that when compared with sham, hepatocyte-, and MSC-transplanted
mice, mice with liver bud transplantation exhibited the strongest metabolizing
capabilities of both drugs (Figure
4(e,f)). To further characterize the maturation of transplanted human liver buds
in comparison with newly generated human liver buds or adult human livers, the expression
profiles of 38 mature liver signature genes were analyzed. The results showed that the
expression profile of 30-day transplanted human livers was more similar to the one of
adult human livers than the one of newly assembled human liver buds (Figure 5(a)). We then performed a quantitative
real-time PCR analysis to validate the expression of nine key markers of mature livers in
naïve hUCBSCs, newly generated human liver buds, 30-day transplanted human liver buds,
adult human livers, and HepG2 hepatoma liver cells. The expression of those genes in
transplanted human liver buds was similar to that in adult human livers (except AFP), and
much higher than that in newly generated liver buds (Figure 5(b)). In conclusion, transplantation with
self-assembled human liver buds could efficiently alleviate liver injury as they undergo
in vivo maturation.
Figure 4.
Mesenteric transplantation with assembled human 3D liver bud rescued acute liver
failure in mice. (a) Kaplan–Meier survival curves of TK-NOG mice after liver injury
induction, with or without human liver bud mesenteric transplantation, or
hepatocytes/naïve MSC splenic transplantations for a 30-day observation. (b,c)
Expressional changes of human albumin and alpha 1 antitrypsin (AAT) from TK-NOG mice
after liver injury induction, with or without human liver bud mesenteric
transplantation, or hepatocytes/naïve MSC splenic transplantations for a 30-day
observation. (d) Representative immunofluorescence staining of liver bud (for
mesenteric human liver bud transplantation) or host liver tissues (for
hepatocytes/naïve MSC splenic transplantations) at day 30. Scale bars, 100 µm. (e,f)
Changes of human-specific ketoprofen and debrisoquine metabolite formations in sham,
liver bud-, hepatocyte-, and MSC-transplanted mice. For debrisoquine, metabolic ratios
were calculated by dividing the AUC0–8 h (the area under the curve from
time 0 until 8 h) ratio of 4-hyroxydebrisoqune (4OHDB) to debrisoquine (DB). Data are
presented as mean ± SEM, and significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test
followed by Dunn’s post hoc test (*,***P < 0.05 or 0.001 vs. day
0).
Figure 5.
Signature gene expression profiles of mesenteric transplants of human liver bud. (a)
Microarray analysis of mature liver marker genes in newly generated liver bud,
transplanted (day 30) liver bud, and adult human liver tissue. (b) Quantitative
real-time PCR analysis of key hepatic maturation genes showed that the mesenteric
transplantation of human liver promoted its maturation. Data are presented as mean ±
SEM, and significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s
post hoc test (*,**,***P < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001 between indicated
groups).
Mesenteric transplantation with assembled human 3D liver bud rescued acute liver
failure in mice. (a) Kaplan–Meier survival curves of TK-NOG mice after liver injury
induction, with or without human liver bud mesenteric transplantation, or
hepatocytes/naïve MSC splenic transplantations for a 30-day observation. (b,c)
Expressional changes of human albumin and alpha 1 antitrypsin (AAT) from TK-NOG mice
after liver injury induction, with or without human liver bud mesenteric
transplantation, or hepatocytes/naïve MSC splenic transplantations for a 30-day
observation. (d) Representative immunofluorescence staining of liver bud (for
mesenteric human liver bud transplantation) or host liver tissues (for
hepatocytes/naïve MSC splenic transplantations) at day 30. Scale bars, 100 µm. (e,f)
Changes of human-specific ketoprofen and debrisoquine metabolite formations in sham,
liver bud-, hepatocyte-, and MSC-transplanted mice. For debrisoquine, metabolic ratios
were calculated by dividing the AUC0–8 h (the area under the curve from
time 0 until 8 h) ratio of 4-hyroxydebrisoqune (4OHDB) to debrisoquine (DB). Data are
presented as mean ± SEM, and significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test
followed by Dunn’s post hoc test (*,***P < 0.05 or 0.001 vs. day
0).Signature gene expression profiles of mesenteric transplants of human liver bud. (a)
Microarray analysis of mature liver marker genes in newly generated liver bud,
transplanted (day 30) liver bud, and adult human liver tissue. (b) Quantitative
real-time PCR analysis of key hepatic maturation genes showed that the mesenteric
transplantation of human liver promoted its maturation. Data are presented as mean ±
SEM, and significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s
post hoc test (*,**,***P < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001 between indicated
groups).
Discussion
In this report, we adopted a novel self-assembly strategy to generate functional 3D human
liver buds from a mixture of differentiated hepatocyte-, HSC-, LSEC-like cells, and naïve
human MSCs in an optimized 10:3:1:1 ratio. The 2D cultures of these mixed cell populations
spontaneously form stable spheroidal 3D structures, possibly via a mesenchymal cell-driven
condensation mechanism[23], since we and others have proved that culturing stem cell-derived hepatocytes with
HSCs or endothelial cells alone failed to form 3D transplantable tissues[18]. Newly generated human liver buds expressed markers of early-stage liver development,
but they became similar to adult human livers 30 days after being transplanted into mice
with acute liver failure. In addition, the mesenteric transplantation of human liver buds
drastically alleviated hepatic injuries and rescued animals from liver failure-induced
death.“Organoid therapy” has recently been introduced as a novel approach for the treatment of
clinically intractable diseases, such as end-stage liver diseases[24]. The first vascularized and functional human liver was generated in 2013 from an
iPSC-derived organ bud transplant, which was obtained from a mixture of stem cells,
hepatocytes, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)[18]. Although not specifically tested, this protocol did not utilize HSCs, which are
critical for the basic regulation of liver homeostasis[25]. Moreover, although vascularized, the physiological difference between LSECs and
HUVECs for in vitro liver bud formation has not been evaluated[26]. To overcome these potential problems, we introduced for the first time a novel and
efficient co-differentiation strategy that “transformed” nearly half of MSCs into HSC- and
LSEC-like cells concurrently within 28 days by the sequential addition of growth factors and
signal proteins into the culture medium. Functional tests confirmed the presence of HSC and
LSEC basic characteristics (Figure
2). Importantly, we demonstrated that a physiologically relevant 10:3:3:1 ratio
(hepatocytes: HSC-like cells: LSEC-like cells: naïve MSCs) produced functional and
transplantable 3D liver buds within 72 h[27]. Our pilot study and other reports have proved that addition of LSECs and naïve MSCs
to the cell mixture was indispensable for microvasculature formation and 3D structure
condensation, respectively[18,23].Unlike the conventional acute liver failure model, the ganciclovir-induced liver failure
TK-NOG mouse model is more liver-specific and more compatible with the transplantation of
exogenous human cells[22,28]. Treating mice with common toxins (e.g., thioacetamide) is also toxic to transplanted
human cells. Mesenteric transplantation of 10 self-assembled human liver buds successfully
rescued mice from death, which presents better injury amelioration and better hepatic
protein production compared to splenic transplantation with naïve human MSCs or hepatocytes
(Figure 4). Compared with
orthotopic transplantation methods, the mesenteric transplantation model is less invasive
and more clinically relevant because it does not affect the blood flow from the portal vein,
which is considered to be important to improve hepatic functions[18,29]. After the ablation of transgenic host liver parenchymal cells at the appropriate
time by ganciclovir administration, mesenteric transplants engrafted and matured most likely
through the formation of a functional human vascular network. Indeed, due to the limited
size of in vitro self-assembled liver buds (∼4 mm in diameter), their size
seemed to not be big enough to reverse the occurrence of hepatic failure beyond injury
amelioration. Building a vascularized “bigger” liver tissue is necessary for future clinical
applications.In conclusion, we established a novel in vitro 3D self-assembly protocol
to generate human liver buds derived from human MSCs, which is fast, reproducible, easy to
follow, and which does not require a precoating step before differentiation. The generated
human liver buds could undergo maturation and trigger therapeutic amelioration after their
mesenteric transplantation into an acute liver failure mouse model. Importantly, we found
that this protocol could be used also with human adipose-derived MSCs to generate 3D human
liver buds (data not shown), which may significantly widen its application. Our method may
facilitate future MSC-based multicellular “organoid” formation for therapeutic applications
such as drug testing and regenerative medicine.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, Supplementary_data_all-in-one for Functional 3D Human Liver Bud
Assembled from MSC-Derived Multiple Liver Cell Lineages by Jing Li, Feiyue Xing, Feng
Chen, Liumin He, Kwok-Fai So, Yingxia Liu and Jia Xiao in Cell Transplantation
Authors: A Gasbarrini; G L Rapaccini; S Rutella; M A Zocco; P Tittoto; G Leone; P Pola; G Gasbarrini; C Di Campli Journal: Dig Liver Dis Date: 2006-07-27 Impact factor: 4.088
Authors: Jim F Huggett; Carole A Foy; Vladimir Benes; Kerry Emslie; Jeremy A Garson; Ross Haynes; Jan Hellemans; Mikael Kubista; Reinhold D Mueller; Tania Nolan; Michael W Pfaffl; Gregory L Shipley; Jo Vandesompele; Carl T Wittwer; Stephen A Bustin Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Mohamed T Abdel aziz; Mohamed F El Asmar; Hazem M Atta; Soheir Mahfouz; Hanan H Fouad; Nagwa K Roshdy; Laila A Rashed; Dina Sabry; Amira A Hassouna; Fatma M Taha Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-05-05
Authors: Amanda Marchini; Andrea Raspa; Raffaele Pugliese; Marina Abd El Malek; Valentina Pastori; Marzia Lecchi; Angelo L Vescovi; Fabrizio Gelain Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Flavio Bonanini; Dorota Kurek; Sara Previdi; Arnaud Nicolas; Delilah Hendriks; Sander de Ruiter; Marine Meyer; Maria Clapés Cabrer; Roelof Dinkelberg; Silvia Bonilla García; Bart Kramer; Thomas Olivier; Huili Hu; Carmen López-Iglesias; Frederik Schavemaker; Erik Walinga; Devanjali Dutta; Karla Queiroz; Karel Domansky; Bob Ronden; Jos Joore; Henriette L Lanz; Peter J Peters; Sebastiaan J Trietsch; Hans Clevers; Paul Vulto Journal: Angiogenesis Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 10.658