Stacey S Huppert1, Kathleen M Campbell. 1. aDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition bDivision of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although the liver possesses a unique, innate ability to regenerate through mass compensation, transplantation remains the only therapy when damage outpaces regeneration, or liver metabolic capacity is irreversibly impacted. Recent insight from developmental biology has greatly influenced the advancement of alternative options to transplantation in these settings. RECENT FINDINGS: Factors known to direct liver cell specification, expansion, and differentiation have been used to generate hepatocyte-like cells from stem and somatic cells for developing cell therapies. Additionally, interactions between hepatic epithelial and nonepithelial cells key to establishing hepatic architecture have been used in tissue engineering approaches to advance self-organizing hepatic organoids and bioartificial liver devices. Simultaneously, recent clinically applicable advances in human hepatocyte transplantation and promotion of innate hepatic regeneration have been limited. SUMMARY: Although mature hepatocytes have the potential to bridge to, or replace whole organ transplantation, limits in the ability to obtain healthy cells, stabilize in-vitro expansion, cryopreserve, and alleviate rejection, still exist. Alternative sources for generating hepatocytes hold promise for cell therapy and tissue engineering. These may allow generation of autologous or universal donor cells that eliminate the need for immunosuppression; however, limits exist regarding hepatocyte maturity and efficacy at liver repopulation, as well as applicability to human chronic liver disease.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although the liver possesses a unique, innate ability to regenerate through mass compensation, transplantation remains the only therapy when damage outpaces regeneration, or liver metabolic capacity is irreversibly impacted. Recent insight from developmental biology has greatly influenced the advancement of alternative options to transplantation in these settings. RECENT FINDINGS: Factors known to direct liver cell specification, expansion, and differentiation have been used to generate hepatocyte-like cells from stem and somatic cells for developing cell therapies. Additionally, interactions between hepatic epithelial and nonepithelial cells key to establishing hepatic architecture have been used in tissue engineering approaches to advance self-organizing hepatic organoids and bioartificial liver devices. Simultaneously, recent clinically applicable advances in human hepatocyte transplantation and promotion of innate hepatic regeneration have been limited. SUMMARY: Although mature hepatocytes have the potential to bridge to, or replace whole organ transplantation, limits in the ability to obtain healthy cells, stabilize in-vitro expansion, cryopreserve, and alleviate rejection, still exist. Alternative sources for generating hepatocytes hold promise for cell therapy and tissue engineering. These may allow generation of autologous or universal donor cells that eliminate the need for immunosuppression; however, limits exist regarding hepatocyte maturity and efficacy at liver repopulation, as well as applicability to humanchronic liver disease.
Authors: Karim Si-Tayeb; Fallon K Noto; Masato Nagaoka; Jixuan Li; Michele A Battle; Christine Duris; Paula E North; Stephen Dalton; Stephen A Duncan Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Ki Tae Suk; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Moon Young Kim; Chang Wook Kim; Ja Kyung Kim; Hana Park; Seong Gyu Hwang; Dong Joon Kim; Byung Seok Lee; Sae Hwan Lee; Hong Soo Kim; Jae Young Jang; Chang-Hyeong Lee; Byung Seok Kim; Yoon Ok Jang; Mee Yon Cho; Eun Sun Jung; Yong Man Kim; Si Hyun Bae; Soon Koo Baik Journal: Hepatology Date: 2016-07-30 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Meritxell Huch; Helmuth Gehart; Ruben van Boxtel; Karien Hamer; Francis Blokzijl; Monique M A Verstegen; Ewa Ellis; Martien van Wenum; Sabine A Fuchs; Joep de Ligt; Marc van de Wetering; Nobuo Sasaki; Susanne J Boers; Hans Kemperman; Jeroen de Jonge; Jan N M Ijzermans; Edward E S Nieuwenhuis; Ruurdtje Hoekstra; Stephen Strom; Robert R G Vries; Luc J W van der Laan; Edwin Cuppen; Hans Clevers Journal: Cell Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Wei-Yu Lu; Thomas G Bird; Luke Boulter; Atsunori Tsuchiya; Alicia M Cole; Trevor Hay; Rachel V Guest; Davina Wojtacha; Tak Yung Man; Alison Mackinnon; Rachel A Ridgway; Timothy Kendall; Michael J Williams; Thomas Jamieson; Alex Raven; David C Hay; John P Iredale; Alan R Clarke; Owen J Sansom; Stuart J Forbes Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: James E Squires; Kyle A Soltys; Patrick McKiernan; Robert H Squires; Stephen C Strom; Ira J Fox; Alejandro Soto-Gutierrez Journal: Curr Transplant Rep Date: 2017-10-14