Literature DB >> 29894829

Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet.

Jaeyeon Yoon1, Enhao Gong2, Itthi Chatnuntawech3, Berkin Bilgic4, Jingu Lee1, Woojin Jung1, Jingyu Ko1, Hosan Jung1, Kawin Setsompop4, Greg Zaharchuk5, Eung Yeop Kim6, John Pauly7, Jongho Lee8.   

Abstract

Deep neural networks have demonstrated promising potential for the field of medical image reconstruction, successfully generating high quality images for CT, PET and MRI. In this work, an MRI reconstruction algorithm, which is referred to as quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), has been developed using a deep neural network in order to perform dipole deconvolution, which restores magnetic susceptibility source from an MRI field map. Previous approaches of QSM require multiple orientation data (e.g. Calculation of Susceptibility through Multiple Orientation Sampling or COSMOS) or regularization terms (e.g. Truncated K-space Division or TKD; Morphology Enabled Dipole Inversion or MEDI) to solve an ill-conditioned dipole deconvolution problem. Unfortunately, they either entail challenges in data acquisition (i.e. long scan time and multiple head orientations) or suffer from image artifacts. To overcome these shortcomings, a deep neural network, which is referred to as QSMnet, is constructed to generate a high quality susceptibility source map from single orientation data. The network has a modified U-net structure and is trained using COSMOS QSM maps, which are considered as gold standard. Five head orientation datasets from five subjects were employed for patch-wise network training after doubling the training data using a model-based data augmentation. Seven additional datasets of five head orientation images (i.e. total 35 images) were used for validation (one dataset) and test (six datasets). The QSMnet maps of the test dataset were compared with the maps from TKD and MEDI for their image quality and consistency with respect to multiple head orientations. Quantitative and qualitative image quality comparisons demonstrate that the QSMnet results have superior image quality to those of TKD or MEDI results and have comparable image quality to those of COSMOS. Additionally, QSMnet maps reveal substantially better consistency across the multiple head orientation data than those from TKD or MEDI. As a preliminary application, the network was further tested for three patients, one with microbleed, another with multiple sclerosis lesions, and the third with hemorrhage. The QSMnet maps showed similar lesion contrasts with those from MEDI, demonstrating potential for future applications.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dipole; MRI; Machine learning; Magnetic susceptibility; QSM; Reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29894829     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  14 in total

1.  QSMGAN: Improved Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping using 3D Generative Adversarial Networks with increased receptive field.

Authors:  Yicheng Chen; Angela Jakary; Sivakami Avadiappan; Christopher P Hess; Janine M Lupo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Fidelity imposed network edit (FINE) for solving ill-posed image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jinwei Zhang; Zhe Liu; Shun Zhang; Hang Zhang; Pascal Spincemaille; Thanh D Nguyen; Mert R Sabuncu; Yi Wang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Nonlinear dipole inversion (NDI) enables robust quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM).

Authors:  Daniel Polak; Itthi Chatnuntawech; Jaeyeon Yoon; Siddharth Srinivasan Iyer; Carlos Milovic; Jongho Lee; Peter Bachert; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Kawin Setsompop; Berkin Bilgic
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Deep Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction: Inverse Problems Meet Neural Networks.

Authors:  Dong Liang; Jing Cheng; Ziwen Ke; Leslie Ying
Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Mag       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 12.551

5.  Edge prior guided dictionary learning for quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiacheng Du; Yuxin Ji; Jiali Zhu; Xiaoli Mai; Junting Zou; Yang Chen; Ning Gu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

Review 6.  Early differentiation of neurodegenerative diseases using the novel QSM technique: what is the biomarker of each disorder?

Authors:  Farzaneh Nikparast; Zohreh Ganji; Hoda Zare
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.264

7.  Classifying intracranial stenosis disease severity from functional MRI data using machine learning.

Authors:  Spencer L Waddle; Meher R Juttukonda; Sarah K Lants; Larry T Davis; Rohan Chitale; Matthew R Fusco; Lori C Jordan; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Acute Post-Concussive Assessments of Brain Tissue Magnetism Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Kevin M Koch; Andrew S Nencka; Brad Swearingen; Anne Bauer; Timothy B Meier; Michael McCrea
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 9.  Rapid MR relaxometry using deep learning: An overview of current techniques and emerging trends.

Authors:  Li Feng; Dan Ma; Fang Liu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.478

10.  Arterial spin labeling MR image denoising and reconstruction using unsupervised deep learning.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Paul Han; Georges El Fakhri; Chao Ma; Quanzheng Li
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-12-22       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.