| Literature DB >> 29893025 |
Stephen C Davis1, Jie Li1, Joel Gil1, Jose Valdes1, Michael Solis1, Alex Higa1, Philip Bowler2.
Abstract
Topical antimicrobials are widely used to control wound bioburden and facilitate wound healing; however, the fine balance between antimicrobial efficacy and non-toxicity must be achieved. This study evaluated whether an anti-biofilm silver-containing wound dressing interfered with the normal healing process in non-contaminated deep partial thickness wounds. In an in-vivo porcine wound model using 2 pigs, 96 wounds were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dressing groups: anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber dressing (test), silver Hydrofiber dressing (control), or polyurethane film dressing (control). Wounds were investigated for 8 days, and wound biopsies (n = 4) were taken from each dressing group, per animal, on days 2, 4, 6, and 8 after wounding and evaluated using light microscopy. No statistically significant differences were observed in the rate of reepithelialisation, white blood cell infiltration, angiogenesis, or granulation tissue formation following application of the anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber dressing versus the 2 control dressings. Overall, epithelial thickness was similar between groups. Some differences in infiltration of specific cell types were observed between groups. There were no signs of tissue necrosis, fibrosis, or fatty infiltration in any group. An anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber wound dressing did not cause any notable interference with normal healing processes.Entities:
Keywords: anti-biofilm dressings; healing; partial thickness wounds; porcine model; silver
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29893025 PMCID: PMC7949536 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12935
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Wound J ISSN: 1742-4801 Impact factor: 3.315