Literature DB >> 33255545

Silver Sulfadiazine Eradicates Antibiotic-Tolerant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms in Patients with Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Enea Gino Di Domenico1, Barbara De Angelis2, Ilaria Cavallo1, Francesca Sivori1, Fabrizio Orlandi2, Margarida Fernandes Lopes Morais D'Autilio2, Chiara Di Segni2, Pietro Gentile2, Maria Giovanna Scioli3, Augusto Orlandi3, Giovanna D'Agosto1, Elisabetta Trento1, Daniela Kovacs4, Giorgia Cardinali4, Annunziata Stefanile5, Tatiana Koudriavtseva5, Grazia Prignano1, Fulvia Pimpinelli1, Ilaria Lesnoni La Parola6, Luigi Toma7, Valerio Cervelli2, Fabrizio Ensoli1.   

Abstract

Infections are among the most frequent and challenging events in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Pathogenic bacteria growing in biofilms within host tissue are highly tolerant to environmental and chemical agents, including antibiotics. The present study was aimed at assessing the use of silver sulfadiazine (SSD) for wound healing and infection control in 16 patients with DFUs harboring biofilm-growing Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All patients received a treatment based on a dressing protocol including disinfection, cleansing, application of SSD, and application of nonadherent gauze, followed by sterile gauze and tibio-breech bandage, in preparation for toilet surgery after 30 days of treatment. Clinical parameters were analyzed by the T.I.M.E. classification system. In addition, the activity of SSD against biofilm-growing S. aureus and P. aeruginosa isolates was assessed in vitro. A total of 16 patients with S. aureus and P. aeruginosa infected DFUs were included in the study. Clinical data showed a statistically significant (p < 0.002) improvement of patients' DFUs after 30 days of treatment with SSD with significant amelioration of all the parameters analyzed. Notably, after 30 days of treatment, resolution of infection was observed in all DFUs. In vitro analysis showed that both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa isolates developed complex and highly structured biofilms. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles indicated that biofilm cultures were significantly (p ≤ 0.002) more tolerant to all tested antimicrobials than their planktonic counterparts. However, SSD was found to be effective against fully developed biofilms of both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa at concentrations below those normally used in clinical preparations (10 mg/mL). These results strongly suggest that the topical administration of SSD may represent an effective alternative to conventional antibiotics for the successful treatment of DFUs infected by biofilm-growing S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus; biofilm; chronic wound; diabetic foot ulcer; silver sulfadiazine

Year:  2020        PMID: 33255545      PMCID: PMC7760944          DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  109 in total

Review 1.  Control of Biofilm Formation: Antibiotics and Beyond.

Authors:  Ammar Algburi; Nicole Comito; Dimitri Kashtanov; Leon M T Dicks; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Thien-Fah Mah
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.165

3.  Assessment of topical therapy of the burn wound with silver sulphadiazine after its use for 15 years in a burn unit.

Authors:  D S Koo; S Zhen; Z D Zhen; X W Shi; S J Xiang
Journal:  Burns       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  S D Ramsey; K Newton; D Blough; D K McCulloch; N Sandhu; G E Reiber; E H Wagner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Diabetes prevalence and determinants in Indigenous Australian populations: A systematic review.

Authors:  Karl E Minges; Paul Zimmet; Dianna J Magliano; David W Dunstan; Alex Brown; Jonathan E Shaw
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.602

6.  Microbiology at first visit of moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infection with antimicrobial activity and a survey of quinolone monotherapy.

Authors:  Carlo Tascini; Alberto Piaggesi; Enrico Tagliaferri; Elisabetta Iacopi; Serena Fondelli; Anna Tedeschi; Loredana Rizzo; Alessandro Leonildi; Francesco Menichetti
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 5.602

7.  Temporal Stability in Chronic Wound Microbiota Is Associated With Poor Healing.

Authors:  Michael Loesche; Sue E Gardner; Lindsay Kalan; Joseph Horwinski; Qi Zheng; Brendan P Hodkinson; Amanda S Tyldsley; Carrie L Franciscus; Stephen L Hillis; Samir Mehta; David J Margolis; Elizabeth A Grice
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  Improving major amputation rates in the multicomplex diabetic foot patient: focus on the severity of peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Andrej Brechow; Torsten Slesaczeck; Dirk Münch; Thomas Nanning; Hartmut Paetzold; Uta Schwanebeck; Stefan Bornstein; Matthias Weck
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.565

9.  Diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  Fassil W Gemechu; Fnu Seemant; Catherine A Curley
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 10.  Microbial Biofilms and Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Amin Omar; J Barry Wright; Gregory Schultz; Robert Burrell; Patricia Nadworny
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.