Literature DB >> 29892937

Surgical team proficiency in minimally invasive esophagectomy is related to case volume and improves patient outcomes.

Akihiko Okamura1, Masayuki Watanabe2, Ian Fukudome1, Kotaro Yamashita1, Masami Yuda1, Masaru Hayami1, Yu Imamura1, Shinji Mine1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is being increasingly performed; however, it is still associated with high morbidity and mortality. The correlation between surgical team proficiency and patient load lacks clarity. This study evaluates surgical outcomes during the first 3-year period after establishment of a new surgical team.
METHODS: A new surgical team was established in September 2013 by two expert surgeons having experience of performing more than 100 MIEs. We assessed 237 consecutive patients who underwent MIE for esophageal cancer and evaluated the impact of surgical team proficiency on postoperative outcomes, as well as the team learning curve.
RESULTS: In the cumulative sum analysis, a point of downward inflection for operative time and blood loss was observed in case 175. After 175 cases, both operative time and blood loss significantly decreased (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), and postoperative incidence of pneumonia significantly decreased from 18.9 to 6.5% (P = 0.024). Median postoperative hospital stay also decreased from 20 to 18 days (P = 0.022). Additionally, serum CRP levels on postoperative day 1 showed a significant, but weak inverse association with the number of cases (P = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: After 175 cases, both operative time and blood loss significantly decreased. In addition, the incidence of pneumonia decreased significantly. Additionally, surgical team proficiency may decrease serum CRP levels immediately after MIE. Surgical team proficiency based on team experience had beneficial effects on patients undergoing MIE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning curve; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Teamwork; Volume-outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29892937     DOI: 10.1007/s10388-018-0607-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Esophagus        ISSN: 1612-9059            Impact factor:   4.230


  29 in total

1.  Learning of thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy: how can the learning curve be made short and flat?

Authors:  I Ninomiya; H Osugi; N Tomizawa; T Fujimura; M Kayahara; H Takamura; S Fushida; K Oyama; H Nakagawara; I Makino; T Ohta
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 2.  Building better teams in surgery.

Authors:  Donald W Moorman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Triangulating stapling technique covered with the pedicled omental flap for esophagogastric anastomosis: a safe anastomosis with fewer complications.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Yoshifumi Baba; Masayuki Watanabe; Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Shiro Iwagami; Junji Kurashige; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Masayuki Watanabe; Yoshifumi Baba; Shiro Iwagami; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Nobuyuki Ozaki; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Impact of Weekday of Esophagectomy on Short-term and Long-term Oncological Outcomes: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Els Visser; Peter S N van Rossum; Rob H A Verhoeven; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Defining the learning curve in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a CUSUM analysis.

Authors:  Allan Okrainec; Lorenzo E Ferri; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Hiroaki Miyata; Soji Ozawa; Harushi Udagawa; Harushi Osugi; Hisahiro Matsubara; Hiroyuki Konno; Yasuyuki Seto; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Factors affecting cytokine change after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Hiroya Takeuchi; Satoru Matsuda; Masaharu Ogura; Taku Miyasho; Rieko Nakamura; Tsunehiro Takahashi; Norihito Wada; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Yoshiro Saikawa; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Surgeon Volume and Cancer Esophagectomy, Gastrectomy, and Pancreatectomy: A Population-based Study in England.

Authors:  Ravikrishna Mamidanna; Zhifang Ni; Oliver Anderson; Sir David Spiegelhalter; Alex Bottle; Paul Aylin; Omar Faiz; George B Hanna
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  The usefulness of three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kotaro Yamashita; Shinji Mine; Tasuku Toihata; Ian Fukudome; Akihiko Okamura; Masami Yuda; Masaru Hayami; Yu Imamura; Masayuki Watanabe
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.230

2.  Learning Curve for Lymph Node Dissection Around the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve in McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Zi-Yi Zhu; Rao-Jun Luo; Zheng-Fu He; Yong Xu; Shao-Hua Xu; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.