| Literature DB >> 29892357 |
Joaquin C B Nunez1,2, Leann M Biancani2, Patrick A Flight2, Diane E Nacci3, David M Rand2, Douglas L Crawford1, Marjorie F Oleksiak1.
Abstract
Populations of the non-migratory estuarine fish Fundulus heteroclitus inhabiting the heavily polluted New Bedford Harbour (NBH) estuary have shown inherited tolerance to local pollutants introduced to their habitats in the past 100 years. Here we examine two questions: (i) Is there pollution-driven selection on the mitochondrial genome across a fine geographical scale? and (ii) What is the pattern of migration among sites spanning a strong pollution gradient? Whole mitochondrial genomes were analysed for 133 F. heteroclitus from seven nearby collection sites: four sites along the NBH pollution cline (approx. 5 km distance), which had pollution-adapted fish, as well as one site adjacent to the pollution cline and two relatively unpolluted sites about 30 km away, which had pollution-sensitive fish. Additionally, we used microsatellite analyses to quantify genetic variation over three F. heteroclitus generations in both pollution-adapted and sensitive individuals collected from two sites at two different time points (1999/2000 and 2007/2008). Our results show no evidence for a selective sweep of mtDNA in the polluted sites. Moreover, mtDNA analyses revealed that both pollution-adapted and sensitive populations harbour similar levels of genetic diversity. We observed a high level of non-synonymous mutations in the most polluted site. This is probably associated with a reduction in Ne and concomitant weakening of purifying selection, a demographic expansion following a pollution-related bottleneck or increased mutation rates. Our demographic analyses suggest that isolation by distance influences the distribution of mtDNA genetic variation between the pollution cline and the clean populations at broad spatial scales. At finer scales, population structure is patchy, and neither spatial distance, pollution concentration or pollution tolerance is a good predictor of mtDNA variation. Lastly, microsatellite analyses revealed stable population structure over the last decade.Entities:
Keywords: SNP; genetic variation; microsatellites; mtDNA; pollution cline; population genetics
Year: 2018 PMID: 29892357 PMCID: PMC5990737 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Location, PCB126 concentration, and LC50 of each collection site used for the mtDNA analysis of the pollution cline.
| location | population group | acronym | latitude | longitude | PCB in sediment (ng g−1 dw) | LC50 ng PCB 126 l−1 | coastal distance to NBH (km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Bedford Harbour, MA | pollution-adapted | NBH | N 41°40′ 19.2″ | W 70°54′ 50.4″ | 22 667 | 29 174 270 | 0 |
| Sycamore Street, New Bedford, MA | pollution-adapted | SYC | N 41°39′ 14.4″ | W 70°54′ 54.0″ | 3760 | 96 383 | 2.4 |
| Pilgrim Avenue, New Bedford, MA | pollution-adapted | PA | N 41°38′ 45.6″ | W 70°54′ 35.9″ | 874 | 250 035 | 3.3 |
| Fairhaven Launch, Fairhaven, MA | pollution-adapted | FL | N 41°37′ 55.2″ | W 70°54′ 14.4″ | 541 | 488 652 | 4.27 |
| Hacker Street, Fairhaven, MA | pollution-sensitive | HS | N 41°37′ 51.6″ | W 70°52′ 55.2″ | 13 | 1127 | 5.1 |
| Slocums River, Westport, MA | pollution-sensitive | SR | N 41°32′ 9.60″ | W 70°58′ 11.9″ | 7 | 281 | 31.2 |
| Mattapoisett, MA | pollution-sensitive | MA | N 41°38′ 9.60″ | W 70°51′ 57.6″ | 27 | 205 | 29.0 |
Figure 1.Collection sites. (a) Reference populations flanking the pollution cline. Samples from MA and SR were collected in 2014 and were used as reference for the mtDNA experiments. The population from WI was used as reference for the microsatellite study and was sampled in 1999 and 2007. (b) Sites within the pollution cline. The population in NBH was sampled three times: 2014, 2008 and 2000. Samples from 2008 and 2000 were used in the microsatellite analysis; samples from 2014 were used in the mtDNA analysis.
Various genetic diversity measures: nind, sample size; S, segregating sites; h, number of unique haplotypes; hd, haplotype diversity; K, average number of differences; π, nucleotide diversity. Only unique SNPs were considered when reporting diversity estimates in population groups and the standard error (s.e.). These measures were calculated using an alignment of genomes collected from all seven sites. In this alignment, nucleotide sites with mismatches or gaps were excluded.
| population | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBH | 22 | 58 | 15 | 0.9614 | 9.07 | 0.067% (0.008%) |
| SYC | 17 | 59 | 15 | 0.9853 | 9.00 | 0.066% (0.009%) |
| PA | 24 | 64 | 17 | 0.9377 | 7.67 | 0.057% (0.008%) |
| FL | 12 | 41 | 11 | 0.9848 | 8.61 | 0.063% (0.009%) |
| HS | 18 | 44 | 14 | 0.9542 | 6.05 | 0.045% (0.006%) |
| SR | 22 | 45 | 17 | 0.9653 | 7.85 | 0.058% (0.007%) |
| MA | 18 | 55 | 16 | 0.9869 | 8.11 | 0.060% (0.007%) |
| adapted group | 75 | 127 | 43 | 0.9770 | 8.255 | 0.056% (0.004%) |
| sensitive group | 58 | 15 | 43 | 0.9846 | 7.623 | 0.064% (0.004%) |
Below the diagonal: within population pairwise FST values calculated from mtDNA data. Above the diagonal: corresponding FST p-values. Negative FST values are reported as ∼0.00.
| comparison | NBH | SYC | PA | FL | HS | SR | MA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBH | * | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.10 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.28 | |
| SYC | 0.01 | * | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.31 | < 0.001 | 0.88 | |
| PA | 0.02 | 0.01 | * | 0.93 | 0.11 | < 0.001 | 0.16 | |
| FL | 0.03 | 0.02 | ∼0.00 | * | 0.19 | < 0.001 | 0.19 | |
| HS | 0.06 | ∼0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 | * | < 0.001 | 0.01 | |
| SR | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.06 | * | 0.01 | |
| MA | 0.01 | ∼0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | * | |
Figure 2.(a) Maximum-parsimony haplotype network considering all haplotypes in the sample. (b) Distribution of haplotypes among all 133 samples. The abscissa represents each of the 77 haplotypes in the sample. The stacked bars represent the number of individuals showing that particular haplotype colour-coded by population. (c) Shared haplotype matrix. Each row in the matrix represents each of the 77 haplotypes. Light/dark boxes represent the presence/absence of that haplotype in a particular population. In all cases, the star indicates the most common haplotype.
Figure 3.(a) Frequency of haplotypes bearing at least one non-synonymous SNP (NS; red bars), and haplotypes with only synonymous SNPs (S; blue bars), across all populations. (b) Relative enrichment (odds ratio) of NS relative to S across populations. (c) Principal component analysis in mtDNA haplotype frequencies. Sediment pollution (PCB126 sediment concentration; green arrow) and pollution sensitivity (LC50 to PCB126; brown arrow) were added into the PCA as supplementary variables.
Figure 4.Spatial patterns and migration rates. (a) IBD analysis considering all seven populations (i.e. broad scale). (b) IBD analysis considering only the populations within the cline (i.e. fine scale). (c) Migration rates along the pollution cline and neighbouring sites. The figure shows median mutation-scaled migration rates M→ (as well as the 25th and 75th IQRs of the posterior distribution) relative to log10 transformed coastal distances between sites (d). The colours of each data point correspond to the receiving population (i). Migration routes are labelled throughout the graph. Linear model and 95% confidence intervals are shown. (d) Migration rates estimated in pairwise comparisons of NBH relative to all other populations. Linear model and 95% confidence intervals are shown only for estimates within the pollution cline.
Below the diagonal: population pairwise FST values calculated from microsatellite data. Above the diagonal: corresponding FST p-values. Negative FST values are reported as ∼0.00.
| comparison | WI-1999 | WI-2007 | NBH-2000 | NBH-2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WI-1999 | * | 0.35 | 0.12 | <0.001 | |
| WI-2007 | 0.00 | * | 0.49 | 0.47 | |
| NBH-2000 | 0.01 | ∼0.00 | * | 0.77 | |
| NBH-2008 | 0.024 | ∼0.00 | ∼0.00 | * | |
Figure 5.Microsatellite loci analyses. (a) Weighted average theta values overall loci from Microsatellite Analyser (MSA, based on gene diversity and stepwise mutation model). Confidence intervals estimated by standard error of weighted theta values across loci. (b) Theta estimates for each microsatellite locus with data pooled across years. Theta values are based on gene diversity and stepwise mutation model.