Literature DB >> 27044302

Ecological population genomics in the marine environment.

Douglas L Crawford, Marjorie F Oleksiak.   

Abstract

Marine species live in a wide diversity of environments and yet, because of their pelagic life stages, are thought to be well-connected: they have high migration rates that inhibit significant population structure. Recent innovations in sequencing technologies now provide information on nucleotide polymorphisms at thousands to tens of thousands of loci based on whole genomes, reduced representative portions of genomes (0.1-1%) or a majority of expressed mRNAs. Data from these genomic approaches are used to define and quantify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). These SNP data tend to agree with data from older technologies (allozymes or microsatellites), which support well-connected populations with few genetic differences among populations. However, these studies also find few percentages of SNPs (1-5%) that readily distinguish genetic differences among populations on relatively small geographic scales. The magnitudes of the genetic differences (FST values) suggest that hundreds of loci with significant differences are due to positive selective pressures. Thus, these data suggest that natural selection is effectively altering allele frequencies at 100s of loci in marine populations. In this manuscript, we provide examples of these studies, the strengths and weaknesses of different genomic approaches as well as important technical aspects associated with genomic approaches.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  GBS; RAD; RNA-Seq; evolution; population genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27044302     DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elw008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics        ISSN: 2041-2649            Impact factor:   4.241


  6 in total

1.  Fine-scale genetic structure due to adaptive divergence among microhabitats.

Authors:  D N Wagner; T Z Baris; D I Dayan; X Du; M F Oleksiak; D L Crawford
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Lineage divergence, local adaptation across a biogeographic break, and artificial transport, shape the genetic structure in the ascidian Pyura chilensis.

Authors:  Nicolás I Segovia; Cristian Gallardo-Escárate; Elie Poulin; Pilar A Haye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Evolutionary Toxicogenomics of the Striped Killifish (Fundulus majalis) in the New Bedford Harbor (Massachusetts, USA).

Authors:  Paolo Ruggeri; Xiao Du; Douglas L Crawford; Marjorie F Oleksiak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Genome-wide analysis clarifies the population genetic structure of wild gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata).

Authors:  Francesco Maroso; Konstantinos Gkagkavouzis; Sabina De Innocentiis; Jasmien Hillen; Fernanda do Prado; Nikoleta Karaiskou; John Bernard Taggart; Adrian Carr; Einar Nielsen; Alexandros Triantafyllidis; Luca Bargelloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Green, yellow or black? Genetic differentiation and adaptation signatures in a highly migratory marine turtle.

Authors:  Rocío Álvarez-Varas; Noemi Rojas-Hernández; Maike Heidemeyer; Cynthia Riginos; Hugo A Benítez; Raúl Araya-Donoso; Eduardo Reséndiz; Mónica Lara-Uc; Daniel A Godoy; Juan Pablo Muñoz-Pérez; Daniela E Alarcón-Ruales; Joanna Alfaro-Shigueto; Clara Ortiz-Alvarez; Jeffrey C Mangel; Juliana A Vianna; David Véliz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Stable genetic structure and connectivity in pollution-adapted and nearby pollution-sensitive populations of Fundulus heteroclitus.

Authors:  Joaquin C B Nunez; Leann M Biancani; Patrick A Flight; Diane E Nacci; David M Rand; Douglas L Crawford; Marjorie F Oleksiak
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.