| Literature DB >> 29892275 |
Laura Treu1, Stefano Campanaro2, Panagiotis G Kougias1, Cristina Sartori3, Ilaria Bassani1, Irini Angelidaki2.
Abstract
Biogas upgrading via carbon dioxide hydrogenation is an emerging technology for electrofuel production. The biomethanation efficiency is strongly dependent on a balanced microbial consortium, whose high- resolution characterization along with their functional potential and interactions are pivotal for process optimization. The present work is the first genome-centric metagenomic study on mesophilic and thermophilic biogas upgrading reactors aiming to define the metabolic profile of more than 200 uncultivated microbes involved in hydrogen assisted methanogenesis. The outcomes from predictive functional analyses were correlated with microbial abundance variations to clarify the effect of process parameters on the community. The operational temperature significantly influenced the microbial richness of the reactors, while the H2 addition distinctively alternated the abundance of the taxa. Two different Methanoculleus species (one mesophilic and one thermophilic) were identified as the main responsible ones for methane metabolism. Finally, it was demonstrated that the addition of H2 exerted a selective pressure on the concerted or syntrophic interactions of specific microbes functionally related to carbon fixation, propionate and butanoate metabolisms. Novel bacteria were identified as candidate syntrophic acetate oxidizers (e.g., Tepidanaerobacter sp. DTU063), while the addition of H2 favored the proliferation of potential homoacetogens (e.g., Clostridia sp. DTU183). Population genomes encoding genes of Wood-Ljungdahl pathway were mainly thermophilic, while propionate degraders were mostly identified at mesophilic conditions. Finally, putative syntrophic interactions were identified between microbes that have either versatile metabolic abilities or are obligate/facultative syntrophs.Entities:
Keywords: anaerobic digestion; biogas upgrade; mesophilic; metabolic reconstruction; metagenomics; methanogens; syntrophs; thermophilic
Year: 2018 PMID: 29892275 PMCID: PMC5985405 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Reactors' operation at steady state conditions before and after H2 addition.
| Temperature (°C) | 35 ± 1 | 35 ± 1 | 55 ± 1 | 55 ± 1 |
| CH4 yield (mL/gVS) | 111 ± 24 | 168 ± 21 | 249 ± 27 | 359 ± 22 |
| Biogas composition (%) | ||||
| CH4 | 69.7 ± 0.3 | 88.9 ± 2.4 | 67.1 ± 0.8 | 85.1 ± 3.7 |
| CO2 | 30.3 ± 0.3 | 8.8 ± 3.2 | 32.9 ± 0.9 | 6.6 ± 0.9 |
| H2 | 0 | 2.3 ± 1.8 | 0 | 8.3 ± 3.6 |
| H2 consumption efficiency (%) | 0 | 98.8 ± 1.2 | 0 | 92.4 ± 3.3 |
| pH | 7.73 ± 0.15 | 8.17 ± 0.13 | 7.89 ± 0.17 | 8.49 ± 0.04 |
| VFA (mg/L) | 90.10 ± 49.23 | 155.94 ± 31.94 | 284.76 ± 168.24 | 381.41 ± 73.59 |
| Acetate (mg/L) | 61.90 ± 8.20 | 143.60 ± 39.51 | 236.34 ± 169.47 | 320.55 ± 58.34 |
| Propionate (mg/L) | 1.48 ± 0.33 | 3.30 ± 2.66 | 7.87 ± 7.66 | 42.27 ± 12.89 |
| iso-butyrate (mg/L) | 0.02 ± 0.07 | 0.20 ± 0.29 | 1.99 ± 0.65 | 1.05 ± 1.53 |
| Butyrate (mg/L) | 2.38 ± 0.84 | 1.16 ± 1.26 | 4.40 ± 1.95 | 1.52 ± 1.65 |
| iso-valerate (mg/L) | 0.09 ± 0.19 | / | 1.40 ± 1.24 | 1.13 ± 1.67 |
| Valerate (mg/L) | 0.92 ± 1.75 | 3.95 ± 9.24 | 0.84 ± 1.39 | 14.52 ± 18.79 |
| n-hexanoate (mg/L) | 23.32 ± 44.20 | 0.11 ± 0.33 | 31.91 ± 57.16 | 0.36 ± 0.66 |
Figure 1Abundance of extracted population genomes. All the reconstructed PGs were illustrated for both temperature conditions to emphasize the differences among the two communities. PGs abundance in the mesophilic (left) and thermophilic (right) biogas microbial community has been represented as bubble graphs. Abundance before (light blue/red) and after (dark blue/red) H2 addition are represented as circles. The area size of each circle is proportional to the abundance of the corresponding PG. Taxonomic assignment at phylum level has been indicated using colored borders and coloring phyla names accordingly. Numbers below circles refer to the IDs of the corresponding PG (e.g., DTU000).
Figure 2Phylogenetic relationships among archaea. Phylogenetic tree based on mcrA gene comprising all archaea with whole genome sequence deposited at NCBI. PGs considered in the present study and belonging to the thermophilic community are highlighted in red. Methanosarcina sp. DTU271 was not included since its mcrA gene was not recovered by the binning process.
PGs having genes involved in specific metabolic pathways found to be influenced by H2 addition.
| DTU232 | −4.65 | 24* | 10* | 8 | 14 | 1 | |||||
| DTU204 | −2.98 | 12* | 18* | 9 | 7 | 4 | |||||
| DTU223 | −0.17 | −0.99 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 1 | |||||
| DTU183 | 0.43 | 14* | 20* | 32* | 14* | 8 | 11 | 3 | |||
| DTU077 | 4.04 | 14* | 14* | 10 | 8 | 4 | |||||
| DTU122 | 2.15 | 1 | 8 | 11 | 5 | ||||||
| DTU192 | 0.73 | 8 | 5 | 3 | |||||||
| DTU236 | 0.64 | 18* | 24* | 29* | 10 | 11 | 2 | ||||
| DTU093 | 0.55 | 29* | 39* | 9 | 32 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| DTU027 | 0.24 | 8 | 9 | 2 | |||||||
| DTU021 | −0.08 | 22* | 21* | 10 | 13 | 3 | |||||
| DTU095 | −0.44 | 23* | 28* | 62* | 9 | 27 | 3 | 1 | |||
| DTU063 | −2.33 | 33* | 8 | 22 | |||||||
| DTU008 | −2.69 | 15* | 15* | 28* | 8 | 15 | |||||
| DTU251 | 1.35 | 27* | 26* | 21* | 21 | 1 | 14 | 1 | |||
| DTU245 | 0.92 | 20* | 9 | 29 | 3 | ||||||
| DTU254 | −0.21 | 22* | 14* | 13* | 20 | 1 | |||||
| DTU156 | −1.62 | 27* | 24 | 2 | 7 | ||||||
| DTU260 | −4.63 | 22* | 17* | 17* | 20 | 17 | 2 | ||||
| DTU041 | −5.09 | 28* | 41* | 23* | 28 | 1 | 14 | 6 | |||
| DTU133 | 0.38 | 0.22 | 27* | 25* | 14* | 26* | 9 | ||||
| DTU101 | 0.10 | −1.24 | 20* | 24 | |||||||
| DTU249 | −1.51 | −1.26 | 30* | 36* | 28* | 31* | 1 | 3 | |||
| DTU255 | 3.16 | 2.56 | 20 | 23* | 13* | 31* | 4 | 5 | |||
| DTU248 | −0.66 | 0.58 | 17* | 24* | 10* | 20 | 5 | 18 | 6 | ||
| DTU037 | −1.23 | −2.53 | 30* | 33* | 17* | 24 | 3 | 24 | 2 | ||
| DTU258 | −7.15 | −8.22 | 21* | 11* | 15 | ||||||
| DTU131 | −1.10 | −3.81 | 28* | 27* | 19* | 22* | 9 | ||||
| DTU250 | −1.64 | −5.06 | 31* | 25* | 27* | 23 | 6 | ||||
| DTU190 | 2.28 | 24* | 45* | 25* | 15 | 8 | 4 | ||||
| DTU052 | 1.30 | 19* | 35* | 34* | 38* | 12 | 9 | 2 | |||
| DTU030 | 0.11 | 16* | 21* | 44* | 40 | 1 | |||||
| DTU019 | −1.38 | 30* | 27* | 38* | 20 | 6 | |||||
| DTU130 | −4.66 | 23* | 26* | 13* | 31* | 9 | |||||
| DTU018 | −5.21 | 20* | 36* | 17* | 18 | 9 | 7 |
In the upper part of the table are reported PGs potentially classified as SAOB or homoacetogens; in the lower part of the table are reported the syntrophic PGs (propionate and butyrate degraders). Asterisks indicate statistically significant number of genes in a specific PG in comparison with other genomes (1,000 random sampling process as explained in Methods section; p-values are reported in Supplementary Data .
Figure 3Metabolic reconstruction of syntrophic bacteria. Schematic representation of VFA degradation and H2 and CO2 utilization, including Propanoate and Butanoate degradation, TCA cycle and WL pathway. Genes' presence in selected PGs is reported in the right panel. The selection of the PGs was based on their relevance with the aforementioned pathways and importance for the upgrading process; “a” letter indicates alternative pathway and numbers indicate gene isoforms or subunits of the multiprotein complexes. Clostridia sp. DTU183 gene content is depicted in red (potential homoacetogen); Clostridia sp. DTU077 gene content is depicted in orange (potential homoacetogen); Clostridia sp. DTU021 gene content is depicted in purple (potential SAOB); Syntrophomonadaceae sp. DTU232 gene content is depicted in blue (potential SAOB); Proteobacteria sp. DTU251 gene content is depicted in dark green (potential propionate/butyrate degrader); Firmicutes sp. DTU245 gene content is depicted in green (potential propionate degrader); Corynebacterium sp. DTU130 gene content is depicted in light green (potential propionate/butyrate degrader).
Statistical correlations between overall metabolic functional categories and operational parameters.
| Thermo | Riboflavin m. | 0.04 | 0.26 | Post | Polyketide sugar unit b. | 0.04 | 0.12 |
| Nitrotoluene degr. | 0.03 | 0.18 | Pre | Two-component sys. | 0.03 | −0.01 | |
| Peptidoglycan b. | 0.02 | 0.11 | Flagellar assembly | 0.05 | −0.01 | ||
| Flagellar assembly/Bacterial chemotaxis | 0.00 | 0.11 | Pentose phosphate pathway | 0.05 | −0.04 | ||
| Meso | Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar m. | 0.05 | −0.06 | ABC transporters/PTS sys. | 0.03 | −0.04 | |
| ABC transporters/Bacterial secretion sys. | 0.04 | −0.07 | Alanine, aspartate, glutamate/Tryptophan m. | 0.03 | −0.05 | ||
| Galactose m./Starch and sucrose m. | 0.03 | −0.10 | Nitrogen m. | 0.06 | −0.05 | ||
| Lysine degr./Tryptophan m. | 0.04 | −0.16 | Glycerophospholipid m. | 0.05 | −0.06 | ||
| Glycerophospholipid m. | 0.03 | −0.17 | Sulfur m. | 0.01 | −0.07 | ||
| Polyketide sugar b./Streptomycin b. | 0.01 | −0.35 | Glutathione m. | 0.02 | −0.09 | ||
| Ascorbate and aldarate m. | 0.01 | −0.50 | B. of unsaturated fatty acids | 0.03 | −0.13 | ||
| Thermo | Coenzyme M | 0.00 | 2.46 | Post | Coenzyme M | 0.02 | 0.50 |
| Phage family-specific subsys.s | 0.01 | 0.78 | B. of galactoglycans, lipopolysacharides | 0.02 | 0.05 | ||
| Hyp. associated with RecF | 0.03 | 0.77 | ATP synthases | 0.05 | 0.04 | ||
| Bacteriocins, antibacterial peptides | 0.02 | 0.57 | Dormancy and sporulation | 0.05 | 0.01 | ||
| Spore DNA protection/Dormancy, sporulation | 0.00 | 0.35 | Pre | Phosphorus M. | 0.04 | −0.03 | |
| Flagella protein/Motility and Chemotaxis | 0.01 | 0.32 | Nitrogen M. | 0.01 | −0.04 | ||
| Meso | Fatty acids, Lipids, Isoprenoids | 0.05 | −0.03 | M. of aromatic compounds/M. of central aromatic intermediates | 0.02 | −0.05 | |
| Electron donating | 0.04 | −0.05 | Protein folding | 0.04 | −0.06 | ||
| Protein m./Protein b./Arginine; urea cycle, polyamines/Ammonia as. | 0.02 | −0.09 | Stress response/Oxidative stress/Osmotic stress/Cold shock | 0.03 | −0.08 | ||
| Carbohydrates/Di- and oligosaccharides/Polysaccharides | 0.02 | −0.10 | Sulfur M./Organic sulfur as. | 0.02 | −0.08 | ||
| Stress response/Osmotic stress/Heat shock | 0.03 | −0.13 | Virulence, Disease and Defense/Invasion and intracellular resistance | 0.03 | −0.09 | ||
| Resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds/Detoxification | 0.02 | −0.15 | Motility and chemotaxis/Flagella protein | 0.03 | −0.09 | ||
| Capsular, extracellular polysacchrides/B. of galactoglycans, lipopolysacharides | 0.01 | −0.21 | Potassium m. | 0.01 | −0.11 | ||
| Protein folding/Protein processing and modification/Two related proteases | 0.03 | −0.27 | Two related proteases | 0.03 | −0.12 | ||
| Phosphorus m./Potassium m. | 0.00 | −0.33 | Protein secretion sys. | 0.04 | −0.15 | ||
| Phospholipids/Fatty acid cluster/Hyp. lipase related to phosphatidate m. | 0.03 | −0.41 | Lipids, isoprenoids/Phospholipids/Fatty acid cluster/Hyp. Lipase | 0.02 | −0.19 | ||
| Membrane-bound hydrogenase/Probably Ybbk-related hyp. membrane proteins | 0.03 | −0.45 | Branched-chain amino acids/Glutamine, glutamate, aspartate/Ammonia as./Lysine b. | 0.03 | −0.24 | ||
| Phages, Prophages, Transposable elements/Phages, Prophages/CRISPRs | 0.03 | −0.49 | Electron accepting/ Cytochrome biogenesis/Riboflavin | 0.04 | −0.55 | ||
| Adhesion | 0.01 | −0.67 | Central carbohydrate m./Coenzyme B | 0.04 | −0.78 | ||
KEGG and SEED functional categories were analyzed in order to evaluate their statistically significant effect on operational parameters (PrF indicate p-value), i.e., temperature and H.