Literature DB >> 24973598

A genomic view on syntrophic versus non-syntrophic lifestyle in anaerobic fatty acid degrading communities.

Petra Worm1, Jasper J Koehorst2, Michael Visser3, Vicente T Sedano-Núñez3, Peter J Schaap2, Caroline M Plugge3, Diana Z Sousa4, Alfons J M Stams4.   

Abstract

In sulfate-reducing and methanogenic environments complex biopolymers are hydrolyzed and degraded by fermentative micro-organisms that produce hydrogen, carbon dioxide and short chain fatty acids. Degradation of short chain fatty acids can be coupled to methanogenesis or to sulfate-reduction. Here we study from a genome perspective why some of these micro-organisms are able to grow in syntrophy with methanogens and others are not. Bacterial strains were selected based on genome availability and upon their ability to grow on short chain fatty acids alone or in syntrophic association with methanogens. Systematic functional domain profiling allowed us to shed light on this fundamental and ecologically important question. Extra-cytoplasmic formate dehydrogenases (InterPro domain number; IPR006443), including their maturation protein FdhE (IPR024064 and IPR006452) is a typical difference between syntrophic and non-syntrophic butyrate and propionate degraders. Furthermore, two domains with a currently unknown function seem to be associated with the ability of syntrophic growth. One is putatively involved in capsule or biofilm production (IPR019079) and a second in cell division, shape-determination or sporulation (IPR018365). The sulfate-reducing bacteria Desulfobacterium autotrophicum HRM2, Desulfomonile tiedjei and Desulfosporosinus meridiei were never tested for syntrophic growth, but all crucial domains were found in their genomes, which suggests their possible ability to grow in syntrophic association with methanogens. In addition, profiling domains involved in electron transfer mechanisms revealed the important role of the Rnf-complex and the formate transporter in syntrophy, and indicate that DUF224 may have a role in electron transfer in bacteria other than Syntrophomonas wolfei as well. This article is a part of a Special Issue entitled: 18th European Bioenergetics Conference (Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Volume 1837, Issue 7, July 2014).
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetate; Butyrate; Formate; Functional profiling; Propionate; Syntrophy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24973598     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of acidogenesis products' effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches.

Authors:  Anna Detman; Michał Bucha; Laura Treu; Aleksandra Chojnacka; Łukasz Pleśniak; Agnieszka Salamon; Ewa Łupikasza; Robert Gromadka; Jan Gawor; Agnieszka Gromadka; Wojciech Drzewicki; Marta Jakubiak; Marek Janiga; Irena Matyasik; Mieczysław K Błaszczyk; Mariusz Orion Jędrysek; Stefano Campanaro; Anna Sikora
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 2.  Syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria in methanogenic systems.

Authors:  Maria Westerholm; Magdalena Calusinska; Jan Dolfing
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 16.408

3.  Methanogenic degradation of lignin-derived monoaromatic compounds by microbial enrichments from rice paddy field soil.

Authors:  Souichiro Kato; Kanako Chino; Naofumi Kamimura; Eiji Masai; Isao Yumoto; Yoichi Kamagata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Electron transport phosphorylation in rumen butyrivibrios: unprecedented ATP yield for glucose fermentation to butyrate.

Authors:  Timothy J Hackmann; Jeffrey L Firkins
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Complete genome sequence of thermophilic Bacillus smithii type strain DSM 4216(T).

Authors:  Elleke F Bosma; Jasper J Koehorst; Sacha A F T van Hijum; Bernadet Renckens; Bastienne Vriesendorp; Antonius H P van de Weijer; Peter J Schaap; Willem M de Vos; John van der Oost; Richard van Kranenburg
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2016-08-24

6.  Novel Syntrophic Populations Dominate an Ammonia-Tolerant Methanogenic Microbiome.

Authors:  J A Frank; M Ø Arntzen; L Sun; L H Hagen; A C McHardy; S J Horn; V G H Eijsink; A Schnürer; P B Pope
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 6.496

7.  Archaea and Bacteria Acclimate to High Total Ammonia in a Methanogenic Reactor Treating Swine Waste.

Authors:  Sofia Esquivel-Elizondo; Prathap Parameswaran; Anca G Delgado; Juan Maldonado; Bruce E Rittmann; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.273

Review 8.  Reverse Methanogenesis and Respiration in Methanotrophic Archaea.

Authors:  Peer H A Timmers; Cornelia U Welte; Jasper J Koehorst; Caroline M Plugge; Mike S M Jetten; Alfons J M Stams
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.273

9.  A stable genetic polymorphism underpinning microbial syntrophy.

Authors:  Tobias Großkopf; Simone Zenobi; Mark Alston; Leighton Folkes; David Swarbreck; Orkun S Soyer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  Microbial diversity arising from thermodynamic constraints.

Authors:  Tobias Großkopf; Orkun S Soyer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.