Literature DB >> 29891607

Prevalence of a Cefazolin Inoculum Effect Associated with blaZ Gene Types among Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Four Major Medical Centers in Chicago.

Sheila K Wang1,2, Annette Gilchrist3, Anastasia Loukitcheva4, Balbina J Plotkin5, Ira M Sigar5, Alan E Gross6, J Nicholas O'Donnell4,7, Natasha Pettit8, Amy Buros9, Tristan O'Driscoll4,2, Nathaniel J Rhodes4,7, Cindy Bethel10, John Segreti11, Angella Charnot-Katsikas10, Kamaljit Singh11, Marc H Scheetz4,7.   

Abstract

The efficacy of cefazolin with high-inoculum methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections remains in question due to therapeutic failure inferred as being due to an inoculum effect (InE). This study investigated the local prevalence of a cefazolin InE (CInE) and its association with staphylococcal blaZ gene types among MSSA isolates in the Chicago area. Four medical centers in Chicago, IL, contributed MSSA isolates. Cefazolin MICs (C-MIC) were determined at 24 h by the broth microdilution method using a standard inoculum (SI; 5 × 105 CFU/ml) and a high inoculum (HI; 5 × 107 CFU/ml). The CInE was defined as (i) a ≥4-fold increase in C-MIC between SI and HI and/or (ii) a pronounced CInE, i.e., a nonsusceptible C-MIC of ≥16 μg/ml at HI. PCR was used to amplify the blaZ gene, followed by agarose gel electrophoresis and sequencing to determine the gene type. Approximately 269 MSSA isolates were included. All but one isolate were susceptible to cefazolin at SI, and 97% remained susceptible at HI. A total of 196 isolates (73%) were blaZ positive, with the blaZ types led by gene type C (40%). CInE was seen in 45 blaZ-positive isolates (23%), with 44 (22%) presenting a ≥4-fold increase in C-MIC (SI to HI) and 5 (3%) a pronounced CInE. Four of the five met both definitions of CInE, two of which expressed the type A gene. The prevalence of a pronounced CInE associated with the type A blaZ gene from MSSA isolates in Chicago is low. Our predilection for cefazolin use, even early in the management of hospitalized MSSA infections, is tenable.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MSSA; Staphylococcus aureus; beta-lactamases; blaZ; cefazolin; inoculum effect

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29891607      PMCID: PMC6105856          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00382-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  56 in total

Review 1.  Inoculum effect.

Authors:  I Brook
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1989 May-Jun

2.  Outcome of vancomycin treatment in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Sung-Han Kim; Kye-Hyung Kim; Hong-Bin Kim; Nam-Joong Kim; Eui-Chong Kim; Myoung-don Oh; Kang-Won Choe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Prevalence of blaZ gene types and the inoculum effect with cefazolin among bloodstream isolates of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D J Livorsi; E Crispell; S W Satola; E M Burd; R Jerris; Y F Wang; M M Farley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Clinical experiences with cefazolin and other cephalosporins in bacterial endocarditis.

Authors:  E L Quinn; D Pohlod; T Madhavan; K Burch; E Fisher; F Cox
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Cefazolin and Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

Authors:  D Kaye; W Hewitt; J S Remington; M Turck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Larry M Baddour; Walter R Wilson; Arnold S Bayer; Vance G Fowler; Imad M Tleyjeh; Michael J Rybak; Bruno Barsic; Peter B Lockhart; Michael H Gewitz; Matthew E Levison; Ann F Bolger; James M Steckelberg; Robert S Baltimore; Anne M Fink; Patrick O'Gara; Kathryn A Taubert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Comparative Effectiveness of Cefazolin Versus Nafcillin or Oxacillin for Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infections Complicated by Bacteremia: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDanel; Mary-Claire Roghmann; Eli N Perencevich; Michael E Ohl; Michihiko Goto; Daniel J Livorsi; Makoto Jones; Justin P Albertson; Rajeshwari Nair; Amy M J O'Shea; Marin L Schweizer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: comparison of cephalothin, cefazolin, and methicillin.

Authors:  J Carrizosa; J Santoro; D Kaye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Clinical implications of cefazolin inoculum effect and β-lactamase type on methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Shinwon Lee; Ki Tae Kwon; Hye-In Kim; Hyun Ha Chang; Jong-Myung Lee; Pyoeng Gyun Choe; Wan Beom Park; Nam Joong Kim; Myoung-Don Oh; Do Young Song; Shin-Woo Kim
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.431

10.  Antistaphylococcal activity and beta-lactamase resistance of newer cephalosporins.

Authors:  W E Farrar; P K Gramling
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  7 in total

1.  Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  Justin R Lenhard; Zackery P Bulman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Novel Insights into the Classification of Staphylococcal β-Lactamases in Relation to the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect.

Authors:  Lina P Carvajal; Sandra Rincon; Aura M Echeverri; Jessica Porras; Rafael Rios; Karen M Ordoñez; Carlos Seas; Sara I Gomez-Villegas; Lorena Diaz; Cesar A Arias; Jinnethe Reyes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Cefazolin Inoculum Effect and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Osteoarticular Infections in Children.

Authors:  J Chase McNeil; Lauren M Sommer; Mary Boyle; Patrick Hogan; Jesus G Vallejo; Kristina G Hultén; Anthony R Flores; Sheldon L Kaplan; Stephanie Fritz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Adjunctive Clavulanic Acid Abolishes the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect in an Experimental Rat Model of Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Endocarditis.

Authors:  William R Miller; Kavindra V Singh; Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Prevalence and Characterization of the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect in North American Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates.

Authors:  Tanis C Dingle; Dulini Gamage; Sara Gomez-Villegas; Blake M Hanson; Jinnethe Reyes; April Abbott; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Jennifer Dien Bard; Stephanie Fritz; William R Miller; Lars F Westblade; Barbara Zimmer; Cesar A Arias; Susan Butler-Wu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 11.677

6.  Cefazolin and Ertapenem Salvage Therapy Rapidly Clears Persistent Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Erlinda R Ulloa; Kavindra V Singh; Matthew Geriak; Fadi Haddad; Barbara E Murray; Victor Nizet; George Sakoulas
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Dissemination Of t437-SCCmecIV And Coagulase-Negative t037-SCCmecIII Types Among Borderline Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Skin Infections And Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Maria Stańkowska; Katarzyna Garbacz; Lidia Piechowicz; Marek Bronk
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.