Literature DB >> 29890208

The identification of the ATR inhibitor VE-822 as a therapeutic strategy for enhancing cisplatin chemosensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Qi Shi1, Lu-Yan Shen1, Bin Dong2, Hao Fu1, Xiao-Zheng Kang1, Yong-Bo Yang1, Liang Dai1, Wan-Pu Yan1, Hong-Chao Xiong1, Zhen Liang1, Ke-Neng Chen3.   

Abstract

Inducing DNA damage is known to be one of the mechanisms of cytotoxic chemotherapy agents for cancer such as cisplatin. The endogenous DNA damage response confers chemoresistance to these agents by repairing DNA damage. The initiation and transduction of the DNA damage response (DDR) signaling pathway, which is dependent on the activation of ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related), is essential for DNA damage repair, the maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival. Therefore, ATM or ATR inhibition is considered as a promising strategy for sensitizing cancer cells to chemotherapy. This study is aimed to explore the effect of ATR inhibitor on sensitizing ESCC (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma) cells to cisplatin, and whether ATM deficiency could impact the sensitization. We found that 21.5% of ESCC cases had ATM deficiency and that patients with ATR activation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had worse chemotherapy response and poorer overall survival than that without ATR activation (32 mons vs. >140mons). Then, it was shown that VE-822 inhibited ATR-CHK1 pathway activation, leading to the accumulation of cisplatin-modified DNA. And it inhibited cell proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest in G1 phase and enhanced cell apoptosis. Moreover, VE-822 significantly sensitized ESCC cells to cisplatin, and these two drugs had synergistic effects, especially in ATM-deficient cells, in vitro and in vivo. Our results suggest that ATR inhibition combining with cisplatin is a new strategy for managing patients with ESCC, especially those with ATM-deficiency. However, this is an idea that requires further validation.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATM deficiency; ATR inhibitor; Chemoresistance; DNA damage response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29890208     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  20 in total

1.  USP8 inhibitor-induced DNA damage activates cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and autophagy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Beibei Sha; Yaxin Sun; Shan Zhao; Miaomiao Li; Wenjing Huang; Zheng Li; Jianxiang Shi; Xuefei Han; Pei Li; Tao Hu; Ping Chen
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.691

Review 2.  DNA damage response revisited: the p53 family and its regulators provide endless cancer therapy opportunities.

Authors:  Yasser Abuetabh; H Helena Wu; Chengsen Chai; Habib Al Yousef; Sujata Persad; Consolato M Sergi; Roger Leng
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 12.153

Review 3.  Targeting replication stress in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Alexandre André B A da Costa; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Alan D D'Andrea; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 112.288

4.  ATR inhibition sensitizes liposarcoma to doxorubicin by increasing DNA damage.

Authors:  Juncheng Cui; Dylan Dean; Francis J Hornicek; Raphael E Pollock; Robert M Hoffman; Zhenfeng Duan
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.942

Review 5.  ATM Dysfunction in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Associated Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Samantha A Armstrong; Christopher W Schultz; Ariana Azimi-Sadjadi; Jonathan R Brody; Michael J Pishvaian
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  ATR kinase inhibition sensitizes quiescent human cells to the lethal effects of cisplatin but increases mutagenesis.

Authors:  Rebekah J Hutcherson; Michael G Kemp
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  Exploiting DNA repair defects in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicole M Reilly; Luca Novara; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Targeting HOX/PBX dimer formation as a potential therapeutic option in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lu-Yan Shen; Ting Zhou; Ya-Bing Du; Qi Shi; Ke-Neng Chen
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 6.716

9.  Co-inhibition of BMI1 and Mel18 enhances chemosensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Jiansong Wang; Huaijun Ji; Qiang Zhu; Xinshuang Yu; Juan Du; Zhongmin Jiang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Targeting CDC7 improves sensitivity to chemotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji-Xiang Cao; Yao Lu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.