Literature DB >> 36207426

DNA damage response revisited: the p53 family and its regulators provide endless cancer therapy opportunities.

Yasser Abuetabh1, H Helena Wu1, Chengsen Chai1,2, Habib Al Yousef1, Sujata Persad3, Consolato M Sergi4, Roger Leng5.   

Abstract

Antitumor therapeutic strategies that fundamentally rely on the induction of DNA damage to eradicate and inhibit the growth of cancer cells are integral approaches to cancer therapy. Although DNA-damaging therapies advance the battle with cancer, resistance, and recurrence following treatment are common. Thus, searching for vulnerabilities that facilitate the action of DNA-damaging agents by sensitizing cancer cells is an active research area. Therefore, it is crucial to decipher the detailed molecular events involved in DNA damage responses (DDRs) to DNA-damaging agents in cancer. The tumor suppressor p53 is active at the hub of the DDR. Researchers have identified an increasing number of genes regulated by p53 transcriptional functions that have been shown to be critical direct or indirect mediators of cell fate, cell cycle regulation, and DNA repair. Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) primarily orchestrate and direct the activity of p53 in response to DNA damage. Many molecules mediating PTMs on p53 have been identified. The anticancer potential realized by targeting these molecules has been shown through experiments and clinical trials to sensitize cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents. This review briefly acknowledges the complexity of DDR pathways/networks. We specifically focus on p53 regulators, protein kinases, and E3/E4 ubiquitin ligases and their anticancer potential.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36207426     DOI: 10.1038/s12276-022-00863-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Mol Med        ISSN: 1226-3613            Impact factor:   12.153


  174 in total

1.  Autophosphorylation and ATM activation: additional sites add to the complexity.

Authors:  Sergei V Kozlov; Mark E Graham; Burkhard Jakob; Frank Tobias; Amanda W Kijas; Marcel Tanuji; Philip Chen; Phillip J Robinson; Gisela Taucher-Scholz; Keiji Suzuki; Sairai So; David Chen; Martin F Lavin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Manuel Stucki; Julie A Clapperton; Duaa Mohammad; Michael B Yaffe; Stephen J Smerdon; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  DNA damage, aging, and cancer.

Authors:  Jan H J Hoeijmakers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Mechanisms of ATM Activation.

Authors:  Tanya T Paull
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; D R Pilch; A H Orr; V S Ivanova; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-03-06       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation.

Authors:  Christopher J Bakkenist; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Double strand break repair functions of histone H2AX.

Authors:  Ralph Scully; Anyong Xie
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

Authors:  Alberto Ciccia; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  The molecular basis of ATM-dependent dimerization of the Mdc1 DNA damage checkpoint mediator.

Authors:  Stephanie Jungmichel; Julie A Clapperton; Janette Lloyd; Flurina J Hari; Christoph Spycher; Lucijana Pavic; Jiejin Li; Lesley F Haire; Mario Bonalli; Dorthe H Larsen; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Lukas; Derek MacMillan; Michael L Nielsen; Manuel Stucki; Stephen J Smerdon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.