Literature DB >> 31557599

ATR kinase inhibition sensitizes quiescent human cells to the lethal effects of cisplatin but increases mutagenesis.

Rebekah J Hutcherson1, Michael G Kemp2.   

Abstract

The ATR protein kinase is known to protect cells from DNA damage induced during the replicative phase of the cell cycle. Small molecule ATR kinase inhibitors have therefore been developed to improve the effectiveness of DNA damage-based chemotherapy regimens aimed at killing rapidly proliferating tumor cells. However, whether ATR functions in a similar manner in non-replicating cells has not been examined and is important considering the fact that most cells in the body, including cancer stem cells in solid tumors, normally reside in either a quiescent or differentiated non-replicating state. Using cultured human cell lines maintained in a quiescent or slowly growing state in vitro, ATR was found to be activated following treatment with the common anti-cancer drug cisplatin in a manner dependent on the nucleotide excision repair (NER) system. Moreover, treatment with the ATR kinase inhibitors VE-821 and AZD6738 enhanced quiescent cell killing and apoptotic signaling induced by cisplatin. However, ATR kinase inhibition in quiescent cells treated with a low concentration of cisplatin also elevated the level of mutagenesis at the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase locus and resulted in increased levels of PCNA mono-ubiquitination. These results suggest that the excision gaps generated by NER may require a greater utilization of potentially mutagenic translesion synthesis polymerases in the absence of ATR kinase function. Thus, though ATR kinase inhibitors can aid in the killing of cisplatin-treated quiescent cells, such treatments may also result in a greater reliance on alternative mutagenic DNA polymerases to complete the repair of cisplatin-DNA adducts.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Cisplatin; DNA damage response; Protein kinase signaling; Quiescence; Translesion synthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31557599      PMCID: PMC6905468          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2019.111678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  46 in total

Review 1.  Nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Joyce T Reardon; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  2005

2.  RPA and ATR link transcriptional stress to p53.

Authors:  Frederick A Derheimer; Heather M O'Hagan; Heather M Krueger; Sheela Hanasoge; Michelle T Paulsen; Mats Ljungman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A small molecule screen identifies an inhibitor of DNA repair inducing the degradation of TFIIH and the chemosensitization of tumor cells to platinum.

Authors:  Sergey Alekseev; Mériam Ayadi; Laurent Brino; Jean-Marc Egly; Annette K Larsen; Frédéric Coin
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2014-02-06

4.  Thr-1989 phosphorylation is a marker of active ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase.

Authors:  Edward A Nam; Runxiang Zhao; Gloria G Glick; Carol E Bansbach; David B Friedman; David Cortez
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Coordinated Activity of Y Family TLS Polymerases and EXO1 Protects Non-S Phase Cells from UV-Induced Cytotoxic Lesions.

Authors:  Sarah Sertic; Antonio Mollica; Ilaria Campus; Stefania Roma; Emanuela Tumini; Andrés Aguilera; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Hsk1-Dfp1/Him1, the Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, associates with Swi1, a component of the replication fork protection complex.

Authors:  Seiji Matsumoto; Keiko Ogino; Eishi Noguchi; Paul Russell; Hisao Masai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  ATR autophosphorylation as a molecular switch for checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Shizhou Liu; Bunsyo Shiotani; Mayurika Lahiri; Alexandre Maréchal; Alice Tse; Charles Chung Yun Leung; J N Mark Glover; Xiaohong H Yang; Lee Zou
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Molecular Pathways: Targeting ATR in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Larry M Karnitz; Lee Zou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  DNA nucleotide excision repair-dependent signaling to checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Federica Marini; Tiziana Nardo; Michele Giannattasio; Mario Minuzzo; Miria Stefanini; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi Falconi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Chemotherapy induced DNA damage response: convergence of drugs and pathways.

Authors:  Derek Woods; John J Turchi
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.742

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of Reducing Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) in Experimental Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Jennifer Q J Zhang; Sayanthooran Saravanabavan; Gopala K Rangan
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 2.  Spironolactone and XPB: An Old Drug with a New Molecular Target.

Authors:  Ryan D Gabbard; Robert R Hoopes; Michael G Kemp
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-05-13

3.  Pharmacological inhibition of cryptochrome and REV-ERB promotes DNA repair and cell cycle arrest in cisplatin-treated human cells.

Authors:  Nadeen Anabtawi; William Cvammen; Michael G Kemp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.