Literature DB >> 29887665

Fully Convolutional Neural Networks Improve Abdominal Organ Segmentation.

Meg F Bobo1, Shunxing Bao2, Yuankai Huo1, Yuang Yao1, Jack Virostko3, Andrew J Plassard2, Ilwoo Lyu2, Albert Assad4, Richard G Abramson5, Melissa A Hilmes5, Bennett A Landman1,2,5,6.   

Abstract

Abdominal image segmentation is a challenging, yet important clinical problem. Variations in body size, position, and relative organ positions greatly complicate the segmentation process. Historically, multi-atlas methods have achieved leading results across imaging modalities and anatomical targets. However, deep learning is rapidly overtaking classical approaches for image segmentation. Recently, Zhou et al. showed that fully convolutional networks produce excellent results in abdominal organ segmentation of computed tomography (CT) scans. Yet, deep learning approaches have not been applied to whole abdomen magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation. Herein, we evaluate the applicability of an existing fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) designed for CT imaging to segment abdominal organs on T2 weighted (T2w) MRI's with two examples. In the primary example, we compare a classical multi-atlas approach with FCNN on forty-five T2w MRI's acquired from splenomegaly patients with five organs labeled (liver, spleen, left kidney, right kidney, and stomach). Thirty-six images were used for training while nine were used for testing. The FCNN resulted in a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.930 in spleens, 0.730 in left kidneys, 0.780 in right kidneys, 0.913 in livers, and 0.556 in stomachs. The performance measures for livers, spleens, right kidneys, and stomachs were significantly better than multi-atlas (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). In a secondary example, we compare the multi-atlas approach with FCNN on 138 distinct T2w MRI's with manually labeled pancreases (one label). On the pancreas dataset, the FCNN resulted in a median DSC of 0.691 in pancreases versus 0.287 for multi-atlas. The results are highly promising given relatively limited training data and without specific training of the FCNN model and illustrate the potential of deep learning approaches to transcend imaging modalities.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29887665      PMCID: PMC5992909          DOI: 10.1117/12.2293751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  15 in total

1.  The medical imaging interaction toolkit.

Authors:  Ivo Wolf; Marcus Vetter; Ingmar Wegner; Thomas Böttger; Marco Nolden; Max Schöbinger; Mark Hastenteufel; Tobias Kunert; Hans-Peter Meinzer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Efficient multi-atlas abdominal segmentation on clinically acquired CT with SIMPLE context learning.

Authors:  Zhoubing Xu; Ryan P Burke; Christopher P Lee; Rebeccah B Baucom; Benjamin K Poulose; Richard G Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Multi-Atlas Spleen Segmentation on CT Using Adaptive Context Learning.

Authors:  Jiaqi Liu; Yuankai Huo; Zhoubing Xu; Albert Assad; Richard G Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02-24

4.  MRF-based deformable registration and ventilation estimation of lung CT.

Authors:  Mattias P Heinrich; Mark Jenkinson; Michael Brady; Julia A Schnabel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Towards realtime multimodal fusion for image-guided interventions using self-similarities.

Authors:  Mattias Paul Heinrich; Mark Jenkinson; Bartlomiej W Papiez; Sir Michael Brady; Julia A Schnabel
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

6.  Robust Multicontrast MRI Spleen Segmentation for Splenomegaly Using Multi-Atlas Segmentation.

Authors:  Yuankai Huo; Jiaqi Liu; Zhoubing Xu; Robert L Harrigan; Albert Assad; Richard G Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Multi-atlas segmentation with joint label fusion and corrective learning-an open source implementation.

Authors:  Hongzhi Wang; Paul A Yushkevich
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.081

8.  Multi-atlas Segmentation Enables Robust Multi-contrast MRI Spleen Segmentation for Splenomegaly.

Authors:  Yuankai Huo; Jiaqi Liu; Zhoubing Xu; Robert L Harrigan; Albert Assad; Richard G Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02-24

9.  Spleen size: how well do linear ultrasound measurements correlate with three-dimensional CT volume assessments?

Authors:  P M Lamb; A Lund; R R Kanagasabay; A Martin; J A W Webb; R H Reznek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Improving Spleen Volume Estimation Via Computer-assisted Segmentation on Clinically Acquired CT Scans.

Authors:  Zhoubing Xu; Adam L Gertz; Ryan P Burke; Neil Bansal; Hakmook Kang; Bennett A Landman; Richard G Abramson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence: a critical review of current applications in pancreatic imaging.

Authors:  Maxime Barat; Guillaume Chassagnon; Anthony Dohan; Sébastien Gaujoux; Romain Coriat; Christine Hoeffel; Christophe Cassinotto; Philippe Soyer
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Automatic Contour Refinement for Deep Learning Auto-segmentation of Complex Organs in MRI-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Jie Ding; Ying Zhang; Asma Amjad; Jiaofeng Xu; Daniel Thill; X Allen Li
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20

3.  Fully automated multiorgan segmentation in abdominal magnetic resonance imaging with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Yuhua Chen; Dan Ruan; Jiayu Xiao; Lixia Wang; Bin Sun; Rola Saouaf; Wensha Yang; Debiao Li; Zhaoyang Fan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Fully Automatic Volume Measurement of the Spleen at CT Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Gabriel E Humpire-Mamani; Joris Bukala; Ernst T Scholten; Mathias Prokop; Bram van Ginneken; Colin Jacobs
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-07-22

5.  Convolutional neural network-based automatic liver delineation on contrast-enhanced and non-contrast-enhanced CT images for radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Naohiro Sakashita; Kiyonori Shirai; Yoshihiro Ueda; Ayuka Ono; Teruki Teshima
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-10-02

Review 6.  Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Daniel Jarrett; Eleanor Stride; Katherine Vallis; Mark J Gooding
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.629

7.  Pancreas Volume Declines During the First Year After Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes and Exhibits Altered Diffusion at Disease Onset.

Authors:  John Virostko; Jon Williams; Melissa Hilmes; Chris Bowman; Jordan J Wright; Liping Du; Hakmook Kang; William E Russell; Alvin C Powers; Daniel J Moore
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Automated Contouring of Contrast and Noncontrast Computed Tomography Liver Images With Fully Convolutional Networks.

Authors:  Brian M Anderson; Ethan Y Lin; Carlos E Cardenas; Dustin A Gress; William D Erwin; Bruno C Odisio; Eugene J Koay; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-16

9.  Deep learning-based pancreas volume assessment in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Raphael Roger; Melissa A Hilmes; Jonathan M Williams; Daniel J Moore; Alvin C Powers; R Cameron Craddock; John Virostko
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Evaluation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Spleen Segmentation in Patients with Conditions Directly or Indirectly Affecting the Spleen.

Authors:  Aymen Meddeb; Tabea Kossen; Keno K Bressem; Bernd Hamm; Sebastian N Nagel
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.