| Literature DB >> 29887594 |
Vaclav Prochazka1, Tomas Jonszta1, Daniel Czerny1, Jan Krajca1, Martin Roubec2, Jirka Macak3, Petr Kovar3, Petra Kovarova4, Martin Pulcer5, Renata Zoubkova6, Ivo Lochman7, Veronika Svachova7, Lubomir Pavliska8, Adela Vrtkova9, David Kasprak10, Jaromir Gumulec10, John W Weisel11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to investigate the role of von Willebrand factor (vWF), the vWF-cleaving protease, ADAMTS13, the composition of thrombus, and patient outcome following mechanical cerebral artery thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective cohort study included 131 patients with ischemic stroke (<6 hours) with or without intravenous thrombolysis. Interventional procedure parameters, hemocoagulation markers, vWF, ADAMTS13, and histological examination of the extracted thrombi were performed. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was used on hospital admission, after 24 hours, at day 7; the three-month modified Rankin Scale score was used. RESULTS Mechanical thrombectomy resulted in a Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) score of 2-3, with recanalization in 89% of patients. Intravenous thrombolysis was used in 101 (78%). Patients with and without intravenous thrombolysis therapy had a good clinical outcome (score 0-2) in 47% of cases (P=0.459) using the three-month modified Rankin Scale. Patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥15 had significantly increased vWF levels (P=0.003), and a significantly increased vWF: ADAMTS13 ratio (P=0.038) on hospital admission. Significant correlation coefficients were found for plasma vWF and thrombo-embolus vWF (r=0.32), platelet (r=0.24), and fibrin (r=0.26) levels. In the removed thrombus, vWF levels were significantly correlated with platelet count (r=0.53), CD31-positive cells (r=0.38), and fibrin (r=0.48). CONCLUSIONS In patients with acute ischemic stroke, mechanical cerebral artery thrombectomy resulted in a good clinical outcome in 47% of cases, with and without intravenous thrombolysis therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29887594 PMCID: PMC6029516 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.908441
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Patient demographics and medical history.
| Variable | Categories | n (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Female | 62 (47) | 0.95 (0.44–2.05) | 0.999 |
| Male | 69 (53) | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | No | 99 (79) | 2.62 (0.98–6.98) | 0.064 |
| Yes | 27 (21) | |||
| Hyperlipidemia | No | 55 (44) | 0.58 (0.27–1.27) | 0.237 |
| Yes | 71 (56) | |||
| Hypertension | No | 27 (21) | 3.33 (1.17–9.52) | |
| Yes | 99 (79) | |||
| Smoking | No | 101 (80) | 1.18 (0.46–2.99) | 0.815 |
| Yes | 25 (20) | |||
| Alcohol abuse | No | 124 (98) | NA | NA |
| Yes | 2 (2) | |||
| Arrhythmia | No | 75 (60) | 1.09 (0.50–2.37) | 0.846 |
| Yes | 51 (40) | |||
| Previous TIA | No | 121 (96) | 0.87 (0.12–6.42) | 0.999 |
| Yes | 5 (4) | |||
| Previous stroke | No | 106 (84) | 1.95 (0.67–5.68) | 0.300 |
| Yes | 20 (16) | |||
| Age | Years | 71 (53–82) | ||
| Systolic BP | mmHg | 151 (120–184) | 0.100 | |
| Diastolic BP | mmHg | 85 (70–107) | 0.471 | |
| Glycemia | mmol/l | 6.8 (5.3–9.2) | 0.832 | |
| Cholesterol | mmol/l | 4.4 (3.4–6.1) | 0.469 | |
| BMI | kg/cm2 | 27.7 (22.9–35.2) | 0.187 | |
| Inception to IVT | min | 92 (62–152) | ||
| Inception to DSA | min | 160 (100–270) | 0.561 | |
| Arrival to IVT | min | 25 (17–40) | 0.140 | |
| Arrival to DSA | min | 58 (20–90) | 0.493 | |
| Procedure duration | min | 45 (25–85) | 0.139 | |
| Recanalization | min | 200 (130–330) | 0.432 | |
Odds ratios for achieving better clinical status were computed (where possible), together with 95% confidence intervals and p-values of Chi-square test of independence (or Fisher’s exact test where necessary);
P-values of Mann-Whitney U test were computed to compare patients with three-month modified Rankin Scale (3M-mRS) score of 0–2 and patients with a three-month modified Rankin Scale score of 3–6.
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT); digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
Figure 1Age comparison of clinical outcome. Age by three-month modified Rankin Scale score Multiple boxplots show whether patients with better three-month modified Rankin Scale score (3M-mRS) were younger or older than patients with worse three-month modified Rankin Scale score. There was a significant difference in terms of the age of all patients with reference to the three-month modified Rankin Scale score (P=0.007).
Figure 2Patient outcome following mechanical thrombectomy. (A) Extraction devices and three-month modified Rankin Scale (3M-mRS) score: three months after the procedure, no significant difference was observed between the extraction devices used (P=0.98). (B) Intravenous thrombolysis: no significant difference in the three-month modified Rankin Scale score (P=0.459) between the groups of patients with and without intravenous thrombolysis before the interventional procedure. (C) Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) score for recanalization: significantly better clinical outcomes (P=0.027) were observed in patients with TICI score of 2–3 for recanalization of the large vessel occlusion (LVO) than in patients with a TICI score of 0–1 for recanalization.
Thrombectomy procedure and clinical outcome.
| Procedure description | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Categories | n (%) | OR (95% CI) | P |
| Intravenous thrombolysis (IIVT) | No | 29 (22) | 0.70 (0.28–1.75) | 0.497 |
| Yes | 101 (78) | |||
| Alberta Stroke Program for Early CT Score (ASPECTS) | 0–5 | 1 (1) | NA | NA |
| 6–10 | 129 (99) | |||
| Alberta collateral scoring | 0–2 | 40 (31) | 0.17 (0.06–0.46) | |
| 3–5 | 89 (69) | |||
| SICH | No | 122 (97) | NA | NA |
| Yes | 4 (3) | |||
| Non-SICH | No | 103 (82) | 1.81 (0.66–4.99) | 0.321 |
| Yes | 23 (18) | |||
| Decompression | No | 125 (99) | NA | NA |
| Yes | 1 (1) | |||
| Type of used anesthesia | Local anesthesia | 10 (7) | ||
| IV sedation | 69 (51) | 0.70 (0.32–1.57) | 0.388 | |
| General anesthesia | 52 (39) | |||
| Previous statin medication | No | 50 (40) | 0.53 (0.24–1.17) | 0.166 |
| Yes | 76 (60) | |||
| Previous antithrombotic medication | No | 57 (45) | 2.39 (1.09–5.26) | |
| Yes | 69 (55) | |||
| The thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grading system | (0) – no perfusion | 8 (6) | ||
| Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) score | (1) – minimal perfusion | 6 (5) | ||
| (2) – partial perfusion | 36 (28) | |||
| (3) – complete perfusion | 79 (61) | |||
| NIH Stroke Scale at the time of arrival to the hospital (NIHSS-entry) | Minor | 2 (2) | ||
| Moderate | 41 (33) | |||
| Moderate to severe | 53 (42) | |||
| Severe | 30 (23) | |||
| NIH Stroke Scale 24 hours after the mechanical thrombectomy procedure (NIHSS-24 h) | Minor | 28 (23) | ||
| Moderate | 66 (54) | |||
| Moderate to severe | 18 (15) | |||
| Severe | 11 (8) | |||
| NIH Stroke Scale 7 days after the mechanical thrombectomy procedure (NIHSS-7 d) | Minor | 43 (36) | ||
| Moderate | 57 (48) | |||
| Moderate to severe | 12 (10) | |||
| Severe | 7 (6) | |||
| Modified Rankin Scale 3 months after the mechanical thrombectomy procedure (three-month modified Rankin Scale) | 0–2 | 49 (47) | ||
| 3 | 17 (16) | |||
| 4–5 | 17 (16) | |||
| 6 | 22 (21) | |||
Odds ratios for achieving better clinical status were computed (where possible), together with 95% confidence intervals and p-values of Chi-square test of independence (or Fisher’s exact test where necessary).
Hemocoagulation response and entry National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).
| Variables | Status before the procedure | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIHSS ≤15 | NIHSS >15 | ||
| 196 (124; 313) | 201 (151; 272) | 0.948 | |
| 0.2 (0.2; 0.3) | 0.2 (0.2; 0.3) | 0.359 | |
| 11.7 (10.0; 13.0) | 11.2 (10.2; 12.6) | 0.309 | |
| 14.1 (11.3; 17.8) | 13.8 (11.6; 17.2) | 0.731 | |
| 3.3 (1.7; 7.7) | 3.7 (1.6; 8.4) | 0.862 | |
| 38.8 (24.1; 47.2) | 34.0 (25.5; 46.0) | 0.321 | |
| 10.0 (6.4; 12.5) | 9.1 (6.1; 14.7) | 0.531 | |
| 0.6 (0.3; 1.1) | 0.6 (0.4; 0.9) | 0.708 | |
| 128 (109; 151) | 133 (107; 149) | 0.545 | |
| 0.383 (0.322; 0.443) | 0.390 (0.326; 0.450) | 0.397 | |
| 1.1 (1.0; 1.3) | 1.1 (1.0; 1.3) | 0.981 | |
| 1.0 (0.8; 3.2) | 0.9 (0.8; 1.9) | 0.222 | |
| 18 (14; 30) | 18 (14; 30) | 0.974 | |
| 2.42 (1.44; 3.47) | 2.37 (1.28; 3.70) | 0.651 | |
| 3.3 (0.7; 15.1) | 3.4 (0.8; 24.8) | 0.596 | |
| 175 (132; 276) | 216 (137; 374) | ||
| 174 (73; 280) | 177 (70; 363) | 0.397 | |
| 74 (21; 100) | 71 (16; 98) | 0.601 | |
| 2.5 (1.5; 7.9) | 3.0 (1.9; 15.9) | ||
| 4.1 (1.0; 13.8) | 5.2 (1.1; 31.6) | 0.122 | |
P-values of Mann-Whitney U test were computed to compare patients with different outcomes.
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).
Hemocoagulation response and three-month modified Rankin Scale.
| Variables | Outcome after 3 months | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mRS 0–2 (n=49) | mRS 3–6 (n=56) | ||
| 195 (147; 284) | 205 (148; 271) | 0.584 | |
| 0.24 (0.19; 0.33) | 0.23 (0.17; 0.31) | 0.987 | |
| 11.6 (10.2; 12.7) | 11.2 (10.2; 12.8) | 0.529 | |
| 14.1 (11.8; 17.6) | 13.8 (11.6; 17.6) | 0.497 | |
| 3.8 (1.6; 9.0) | 3.5 (1.8; 7.8) | 0.590 | |
| 37.4 (26.1; 46.4) | 34.0 (26.2; 47.1) | 0.493 | |
| 9.7 (6.1; 13.3) | 8.6 (6.1; 16.1) | 0.322 | |
| 0.6 (0.4; 1.2) | 0.6 (0.4; 1.0) | 0.333 | |
| 130 (112; 152) | 130 (104; 152) | 0.489 | |
| 0.386 (0.326; 0.446) | 0.390 (0.323; 0.452) | 0.987 | |
| 1.07 (0.98; 1.36) | 1.10 (1.00; 1.38) | 0.430 | |
| 1.0 (0.8; 3.1) | 1.0 (0.8; 2.1) | 0.365 | |
| 18 (14; 32) | 19 (14; 30) | 0.912 | |
| 2.4 (1.3; 3.5) | 2.2 (1.2; 3.8) | 0.566 | |
| 2.6 (0.7; 10.7) | 4.4 (0.8; 26.0) | ||
| 174 (118; 298) | 225 (160; 379) | ||
| 150 (50; 320) | 190 (70; 340) | 0.267 | |
| 66 (15; 93) | 78 (20; 101) | ||
| 3.1 (1.6; 15.4) | 3.0 (1.7; 15.4) | 0.689 | |
| 4 (1; 24) | 5 (2; 31) | 0.078 | |
P-values of Mann-Whitney U test were computed to compare patients with different outcomes.
Inflammatory response and clinical outcome.
| Inflammatory response 3–7 days after stroke | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Outcome 7 days after stroke | P | |
| NIHSS ≤15 | NIHSS >15 | ||
| WBC | 8.5 (6.0–12.7) | 11.6 (6.6–14.9) | |
| Neutrophils | 5.7 (3.8–9.0) | 9.1 (4.6–11.0) | |
| Lymphocytes | 1.67 (1.02–2.34) | 1.19 (0.90–2.08) | 0.052 |
| Monocytes | 0.82 (0.52–1.25) | 0.88 (0.53–1.26) | 0.622 |
| Eosinophils | 0.20 (0.04–0.42) | 0.13 (0.02–0.31) | 0.136 |
| Basophils | 0.04 (0.02–0.08) | 0.03 (0.02–0.07) | 0.226 |
| T-cells | 1.16 (0.66–1.61) | 0.86 (0.59–1.25) | |
| Helper T-cells | 0.77 (0.45–1.14) | 0.55 (0.38–0.92) | |
| Cytotoxic T-cells | 0.37 (0.18–0.68) | 0.28 (0.16–0.39) | |
| Natural killer cells | 0.24 (0.12–0.41) | 0.20 (0.08–0.46) | 0.264 |
| DR+ T-cells | 0.075 (0.032–0.170) | 0.054 (0.037–0.145) | 0.218 |
| B-cells | 0.19 (0.08–0.38) | 0.19 (0.08–0.44) | 0.595 |
| CD14+ cells | 0.68 (0.39–1.13) | 0.83 (0.45–1.17) | 0.308 |
| DR+ monocytes | 0.63 (0.37–0.97) | 0.62 (0.41–0.94) | 0.976 |
| CD16+ monocytes | 0.087 (0.041–0.159) | 0.107 (0.044–0.161) | 0.286 |
| Calprotectin | 6.0 (2.9–10.7) | 5.7 (3.9–12.7) | 0.383 |
| WBC | 8.1 (5.8–11.4) | 9.6 (6.6–13.7) | 0.061 |
| Neutrophils | 5.3 (3.1–7.9) | 6.8 (4.1–10.7) | |
| Lymphocytes | 1.73 (1.29–2.78) | 1.47 (0.88–2.28) | |
| Monocytes | 0.81 (0.48–1.18) | 0.88 (0.57–1.25) | 0.345 |
| Eosinophils | 0.20 (0.03–0.42) | 0.18 (0.04–0.35) | 0.231 |
| Basophils | 0.04 (0.02–0.08) | 0.04 (0.02–0.08) | 0.487 |
| T-cells | 1.27 (0.90–1.94) | 1.08 (0.64–1.56) | |
| Helper T-cells | 0.81 (0.59–1.23) | 0.73 (0.36–1.06) | |
| Cytotoxic T-cells | 0.38 (0.19–0.82) | 0.33 (0.16–0.62) | 0.090 |
| Natural killer cells | 0.25 (0.13–0.41) | 0.20 (0.10–0.38) | 0.127 |
| DR+ T-cells | 0.09 (0.04–0.19) | 0.07 (0.03–0.17) | 0.127 |
| B-cells | 0.19 (0.11–0.47) | 0.18 (0.06–0.38) | 0.243 |
| CD14+ cells | 0.66 (0.37–0.96) | 0.77 (0.48–1.17) | 0.114 |
| DR+ monocytes | 0.62 (0.35–0.92) | 0.65 (0.43–0.97) | 0.259 |
| CD16+ monocytes | 0.086 (0.036–0.198) | 0.103 (0.043–0.160) | 0.311 |
| Calprotectin | 5.8 (2.5–10.9) | 6.0 (4.3–12.6) | 0.066 |
P-values of the Mann-Whitney U test were computed to compare patients with different outcomes.
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).
Inflammatory responses.
| Inflammatory response | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Time of measurement | P | |
| Entry | After 3–7 days | ||
| WBC | 9.1 (6.1–13.0) | 8.8 (6.2–12.9) | 0.113 |
| Neutrophils | 6.8 (4.4–11.0) | 5.8 (3.9–9.9) | |
| Lymphocytes | 1.23 (0.72–2.16) | 1.67 (1.01–2.57) | |
| Monocytes | 0.58 (0.35–0.96) | 0.83 (0.52–1.27) | |
| Eosinophils | 0.1 (0.0–0.2) | 0.2 (0.0–0.4) | |
| Basophils | 0.04 (0.02–0.07) | 0.04 (0.02–0.08) | 0.654 |
| T-cells | 0.82 (0.43–1.50) | 1.15 (0.66–1.70) | |
| Helper T-cells | 0.50 (0.27–1.01) | 0.75 (0.42–1.15) | |
| Cytotoxic T-cells | 0.26 (0.11–0.54) | 0.35 (0.18–0.70) | 0.003 |
| Natural killer cells | 0.19 (0.09–0.46) | 0.23 (0.12–0.42) | 0.218 |
| DR+ T-cells | 0.061 (0.027–0.138) | 0.072 (0.033–0.173) | 0.052 |
| B-cells | 0.14 (0.06–0.29) | 0.19 (0.08–0.42) | |
| CD14+ cells | 0.48 (0.28–0.80) | 0.71 (0.41–1.17) | |
| DR+ monocytes | 0.45 (0.27–0.76) | 0.62 (0.38–0.95) | |
| CD16+ monocytes | 0.039 (0.016–0.091) | 0.093 (0.039–0.162) | |
| Calprotectin | 4.9 (2.6–9.8) | 5.8 (2.9–11.1) | |
| WBC | 11.2 (7.3–13.7) | 8.5 (6.0–12.8) | |
| Neutrophils | 8.3 (5.1–11.0) | 5.6 (3.8–9.3) | |
| Lymphocytes | 1.2 (1.0–2.9) | 1.7 (1.0–2.5) | 0.307 |
| Monocytes | 0.90 (0.65–1.27) | 0.82 (0.50–1.26) | 0.426 |
| Eosinophils | 0.11 (0.03–0.27) | 0.19 (0.04–0.42) | 0.289 |
| Basophils | 0.04 (0.02–0.07) | 0.04 (0.02–0.08) | 0.454 |
| T-cells | 0.92 (0.60–1.96) | 1.15 (0.70–1.68) | 0.244 |
| Helper T-cells | 0.67 (0.39–1.14) | 0.75 (0.43–1.15) | 0.478 |
| Cytotoxic T-cells | 0.23 (0.18–0.83) | 0.37 (0.18–0.68) | 0.095 |
| Natural killer cells | 0.25 (0.06–0.42) | 0.22 (0.12–0.42) | 0.908 |
| DR+ T-cells | 0.049 (0.040–0.266) | 0.074 (0.032–0.172) | 0.490 |
| B-cells | 0.20 (0.13–0.38) | 0.19 (0.08–0.42) | 0.631 |
| CD14+ cells | 0.80 (0.55–1.18) | 0.69 (0.40–1.16) | 0.289 |
| DR+ monocytes | 0.60 (0.46–0.93) | 0.63 (0.37–0.95) | 0.694 |
| CD16+ monocytes | 0.114 (0.055–0.180) | 0.087 (0.039–0.162) | 0.242 |
| Calprotectin | 6.4 (3.4–11.3) | 5.8 (2.7–11.0) | 0.387 |
P-values of the paired sign test were computed to compare the inflammatory response at different time points;
P-values of the Mann-Whitney U test were computed to compare patients with different outcome.
Figure 3Histopathology analysis. Photomicrographs in the left column show the light microscopic appearance of thrombus viewed by an Olympus dotSlide BX51 virtual microscope (×20). In the right column, photomicrographs show selected sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and show a large number of neutrophils in the surface of the thrombus. Carstairs’ histochemical staining method for fibrin and platelets shows fibrin in orange-red, and platelets in light grey. Immunohistochemistry for the endothelial cell marker, CD31, is stained light blue; positive immunohistochemistry staining for von Willebrand factor (vWF) was mainly located at the thrombus surface, with granulocytes near the vWF-stained areas. Immunohistochemical staining for CD15 is positive for myelomonocytes (neutrophils and eosinophils).
Figure 4Correlations between hemocoagulation, immune response, histology, and clinical outcome. (A) Significant correlations between hemocoagulation analysis and histology, and between von Willebrand factor (vWF) and thrombotic parameters: platelets, vWF, and fibrin levels. These parameters are significantly correlated with each other. (B) Histology and the inflammatory response shows a significant correlation with fibrin thrombus and inflammatory response parameters. Significant correlation coefficients are circled (level of significance 0.05).