Waleed Brinjikji1, Sharon Duffy2, Anthony Burrows1, Werner Hacke3, David Liebeskind4, Charles B L M Majoie5, Diederik W J Dippel6, Adnan H Siddiqui7, Pooja Khatri8, Blaise Baxter9, Raul Nogeuira10, Matt Gounis11, Tudor Jovin12, David F Kallmes1. 1. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 2. Department of Engineering, Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, Galway, Ireland. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 5. Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA. 8. Department of Neurology, University of Cincinatti, Cincinatti, Ohio, USA. 9. Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Chatanooga, Tennessee, USA. 10. Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 11. Department of Radiology, New England Center for Stroke Research, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA. 12. Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studying the imaging and histopathologic characteristics of thrombi in ischemic stroke could provide insights into stroke etiology and ideal treatment strategies. We conducted a systematic review of imaging and histologic characteristics of thrombi in acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all studies published between January 2005 and December 2015 that reported findings related to histologic and/or imaging characteristics of thrombi in acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. The five outcomes examined in this study were (1) association between histologic composition of thrombi and stroke etiology; (2) association between histologic composition of thrombi and angiographic outcomes; (3) association between thrombi imaging and histologic characteristics; (4) association between thrombi imaging characteristics and angiographic outcomes; and (5) association between imaging characteristics of thrombi and stroke etiology. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of red blood cell (RBC)-rich thrombi between cardioembolic and large artery atherosclerosis etiologies (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.1 to 28.0, p=0.63). Patients with a hyperdense artery sign had a higher odds of having RBC-rich thrombi than those without a hyperdense artery sign (OR 9.0, 95% CI 2.6 to 31.2, p<0.01). Patients with a good angiographic outcome had a mean thrombus Hounsfield unit (HU) of 55.1±3.1 compared with a mean HU of 48.4±1.9 for patients with a poor angiographic outcome (mean standard difference 6.5, 95% CI 2.7 to 10.2, p<0.001). There was no association between imaging characteristics and stroke etiology (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.32 to 4.00, p=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The hyperdense artery sign is associated with RBC-rich thrombi and improved recanalization rates. However, there was no association between the histopathological characteristics of thrombi and stroke etiology and angiographic outcomes. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studying the imaging and histopathologic characteristics of thrombi in ischemic stroke could provide insights into stroke etiology and ideal treatment strategies. We conducted a systematic review of imaging and histologic characteristics of thrombi in acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all studies published between January 2005 and December 2015 that reported findings related to histologic and/or imaging characteristics of thrombi in acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. The five outcomes examined in this study were (1) association between histologic composition of thrombi and stroke etiology; (2) association between histologic composition of thrombi and angiographic outcomes; (3) association between thrombi imaging and histologic characteristics; (4) association between thrombi imaging characteristics and angiographic outcomes; and (5) association between imaging characteristics of thrombi and stroke etiology. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of red blood cell (RBC)-rich thrombi between cardioembolic and large artery atherosclerosis etiologies (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.1 to 28.0, p=0.63). Patients with a hyperdense artery sign had a higher odds of having RBC-rich thrombi than those without a hyperdense artery sign (OR 9.0, 95% CI 2.6 to 31.2, p<0.01). Patients with a good angiographic outcome had a mean thrombus Hounsfield unit (HU) of 55.1±3.1 compared with a mean HU of 48.4±1.9 for patients with a poor angiographic outcome (mean standard difference 6.5, 95% CI 2.7 to 10.2, p<0.001). There was no association between imaging characteristics and stroke etiology (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.32 to 4.00, p=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The hyperdense artery sign is associated with RBC-rich thrombi and improved recanalization rates. However, there was no association between the histopathological characteristics of thrombi and stroke etiology and angiographic outcomes. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: J Kaesmacher; T Boeckh-Behrens; S Simon; C Maegerlein; J F Kleine; C Zimmer; L Schirmer; H Poppert; T Huber Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Raul G Nogueira; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Diogo C Haussen; Alain Bonafe; Ronald F Budzik; Parita Bhuva; Dileep R Yavagal; Marc Ribo; Christophe Cognard; Ricardo A Hanel; Cathy A Sila; Ameer E Hassan; Monica Millan; Elad I Levy; Peter Mitchell; Michael Chen; Joey D English; Qaisar A Shah; Frank L Silver; Vitor M Pereira; Brijesh P Mehta; Blaise W Baxter; Michael G Abraham; Pedro Cardona; Erol Veznedaroglu; Frank R Hellinger; Lei Feng; Jawad F Kirmani; Demetrius K Lopes; Brian T Jankowitz; Michael R Frankel; Vincent Costalat; Nirav A Vora; Albert J Yoo; Amer M Malik; Anthony J Furlan; Marta Rubiera; Amin Aghaebrahim; Jean-Marc Olivot; Wondwossen G Tekle; Ryan Shields; Todd Graves; Roger J Lewis; Wade S Smith; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; Tudor G Jovin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael T Froehler; Satoshi Tateshima; Gary Duckwiler; Reza Jahan; Nestor Gonzalez; Fernando Vinuela; David Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; J Pablo Villablanca Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: John Charles Benson; Sean T Fitzgerald; Ramanathan Kadirvel; Collin Johnson; Daying Dai; Doyle Karen; David F Kallmes; Waleed Brinjikji Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Waleed Brinjikji; Sharon Duffy; Anthony Burrows; Werner Hacke; David Liebeskind; Charles B L M Majoie; Diederik W J Dippel; Adnan H Siddiqui; Pooja Khatri; Blaise Baxter; Raul Nogeuira; Matt Gounis; Tudor Jovin; David F Kallmes Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: R Bourcier; R Pautre; M Mirza; C Castets; J Darcourt; J Labreuche; L Detraz; H Desal; J-M Serfaty; C Toquet Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jun-Soo Byun; Patrick Nicholson; Christopher A Hilditch; Anderson Chun On Tsang; Vitor Mendes Pereira; Timo Krings; Yibin Fang; Waleed Brinjikji Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: C J Maurer; T Dobrocky; F Joachimski; U Neuberger; T Demerath; A Brehm; A Cianfoni; B Gory; A Berlis; J Gralla; M A Möhlenbruch; K A Blackham; M N Psychogios; P Zickler; S Fischer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.825