Literature DB >> 29887331

Optic Disc Pit Maculopathy: A Two-Year Nationwide Prospective Population-based Study.

David H W Steel1, Javid Suleman2, Declan C Murphy3, Anna Song3, Steve Dodds2, Jon Rees4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the incidence, presenting features, treatment, and clinical course of optic disc pit maculopathy (ODPM) in the United Kingdom (UK).
DESIGN: A 2-year nationwide prospective population-based study.
SUBJECTS: All new incident cases of ODPM presenting to UK ophthalmologists using the British Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit monthly reporting system.
METHODS: All reporting ophthalmologists were sent an initial questionnaire requesting data on previous medical and ophthalmic history, presentation details, investigation findings, and management. A further questionnaire was sent at 12 months post diagnosis to ascertain further outcome data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity at initial presentation, at 1 year, and after any intervention. Foveal involvement and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, including retinal layers affected, and the location and size of the optic disc pit. Management, including observation, vitrectomy, and associated procedures.
RESULTS: There were 74 confirmed new cases, giving an annual incidence of approximately 1 per 2 million. Complete data were available on 70 patients (70 eyes) at baseline and 68 after 1 year. There were 35 (50%) female patients with a mean age of 35 years (range, 3-82 years). Visual acuity at baseline ranged from 6/5 to hand movements. In 43 patients (61%) subretinal fluid (SRF) was present, whereas 27 (39%) had intraretinal fluid only. The presence of SRF was associated with worse vision and foveal involvement. Of the 53 eyes initially observed with 1-year follow-up, 10 (19%) deteriorated and 9 (16%) improved on OCT; eyes with SRF were more likely to worsen and those without SRF were more likely to improve. Fifteen of the 70 patients (21%) at baseline had primary surgery and a further 10 had deferred surgery within 1 year of presentation; 19 of these 25 eyes (76%) showed anatomic success with a dry fovea at 1 year of follow-up, and 15 (60%) had a greater than 0.1 logMAR improvement in visual acuity.
CONCLUSION: The incidence and presenting features of ODPM were defined. Patients with SRF had worse vision and were more likely to deteriorate than patients with intraretinal fluid only. Surgery was anatomically successful in 75% of cases. Patients without SRF tended to remain stable with observation. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29887331     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Macular changes in optic disc pits-Optic disc pit maculopathy (ODP-M) : Pathophysiology and possibilities of surgical treatment].

Authors:  J Wachtlin; R G Schumann; M Maier; C Haritoglou
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Optic Pit Maculopathy: Clinical Features and Management Options.

Authors:  Prashanth G Iyer; Harry W Flynn; Kenneth C Fan; Audina M Berrocal; Raquel Goldhardt
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2021-10-07

3.  Inner retinal fenestration for paediatric optic disc pit maculopathy: a case series.

Authors:  Sui Chien Wong; Nicole K Scripsema
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.456

4.  AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN STELLATE NONHEREDITARY IDIOPATHIC FOVEOMACULAR RETINOSCHISIS, PERIPHERAL RETINOSCHISIS, AND POSTERIOR HYALOID ATTACHMENT.

Authors:  Edward Bloch; Blanca Flores-Sánchez; Odysseas Georgiadis; Venki Sundaram; Zubin Saihan; Omar A Mahroo; Andrew R Webster; Lyndon da Cruz
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 5.  Optic disk pit maculopathy: current management strategies.

Authors:  Irini Chatziralli; Panagiotis Theodossiadis; George P Theodossiadis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-10

6.  Treatment outcomes of optic disc pit maculopathy over two decades.

Authors:  Avadhesh Oli; Divya Balakrishnan
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-30

7.  Optic disc pit maculopathy: tamponade of maculoschisis.

Authors:  Robert E Morris; Hannah Hashimi; Andrew J McFarland; Ferenc Kuhn; Mathew Sapp; Matthew Oltmanns
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-05

8.  Surgical outcomes in patients with optic disc pit maculopathy: does peeling the ILM lead to better outcomes?

Authors:  Helena Wagner; Amelie Pielen; Hansjürgen Agostini; Daniel Böhringer; Wolf Alexander Lagrèze; Julia Biermann
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.