Literature DB >> 29887245

Sexual dimorphism of cardiometabolic dysfunction: Gut microbiome in the play?

Tzu-Wen L Cross1, Kazuyuki Kasahara2, Federico E Rey3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex is one of the most powerful modifiers of disease development. Clear sexual dimorphism exists in cardiometabolic health susceptibility, likely due to differences in sex steroid hormones. Changes in the gut microbiome have been linked with the development of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and atherosclerosis; however, the impact of microbes in sex-biased cardiometabolic disorders remains unclear. The gut microbiome is critical for maintaining a normal estrous cycle, testosterone levels, and reproductive function. Gut microbes modulate the enterohepatic recirculation of estrogens and androgens, affecting local and systemic levels of sex steroid hormones. Gut bacteria can also generate androgens from glucocorticoids. SCOPE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes current knowledge of the complex interplay between sexual dimorphism in cardiometabolic disease and the gut microbiome. MAJOR
CONCLUSIONS: Emerging evidence suggests the role of gut microbiome as a modifier of disease susceptibility due to sex; however, the impact on cardiometabolic disease in this complex interplay is lacking. Elucidating the role of gut microbiome on sex-biased susceptibility in cardiometabolic disease is of high relevance to public health given its high prevalence and significant financial burden.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Gut microbiota; Metabolic disease; Sex differences; Steroids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29887245      PMCID: PMC6066746          DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Metab        ISSN: 2212-8778            Impact factor:   7.422


Introduction

Humans harbor over 100 trillion microbes, with the gastrointestinal tract being the most densely populated body habitat [1], [2]. Gut microbial communities include members of the Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya (fungi, protozoa) domains, as well as viruses. Their collective genomes encode for metabolic pathways essential for acquiring nutrients that are indigestible to us and for the generation of metabolites that modulate our metabolism. While some of the effects of gut microbes on the immune system and gut physiology have been recognized for a long time, over the last decade, we have developed a deeper appreciation for the many roles these organisms play in virtually every aspect of our biology. Although there is substantial interpersonal variation in the composition of the distal gut microbiota among unrelated healthy subjects, sequence-based studies have revealed distal gut community patterns associated with different pathological states, including metabolic syndrome. Remarkably, recent studies indicate that the gut microbiota influences the development of cardiometabolic disease: Sub-therapeutic antibiotic therapy in young, conventionally-raised mice results in taxonomic changes in the distal gut microbiota and increases adiposity [3]. Mice of the same genotype, but with different microbiota composition, develop different metabolic phenotypes in response to chronic high-fat/high-sucrose feeding [4]. Germ-free mice are resistant to diet-induced metabolic disease [5]. The absence of the gut microbiome differentially impacts the atherosclerosis susceptibility of apolipoprotein E−/− (ApoE−/−) mice compared to conventionally-raised mice (i.e. fully colonized with microorganisms at birth) [6]. Transplantation of gut microbiota from genetically obese mice or obese humans, to lean, germ-free mice transfers an increased adiposity phenotype [7]. Transfer of gut microbiota from lean, metabolically healthy human donors to humans with metabolic syndrome increases their insulin sensitivity, and this improvement is linked to changes in plasma metabolites [8]. However, beneficial effects are transient, and response is driven by baseline fecal microbiota composition [9]. This evidence highlights the importance of the gut microbiome on the etiology of cardiometabolic disease. Additionally, clear sexual dimorphism exists in cardiometabolic disease. Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are more common in men than age-matched pre-menopausal women. However, this cardioprotection in women is lost once menopause occurs, suggesting the contribution of sex steroid hormones on varying disease susceptibility. Globally, more men are diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D) than women [10]. Men tend to be overweight at a younger age, whereas women tend to be overweight or obese after the age of 45 [11]. Similarly, male mice develop diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance more rapidly than females [12], [13]. Furthermore, obese female mice are more protected against inflammation and glucose intolerance relative to age- and weight-matched males, indicating that the protective effect of estrogen persists in the obese state [12]. Sex steroid hormones also modulate gastrointestinal (GI) health [14], [15]. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are more prevalent in women than in men. These GI disorders have been associated with greater gut permeability due to compromised gut barrier function, which can result in increased levels of pro-inflammatory molecules entering into systemic circulation. Moreover, the symptoms of IBD fluctuate across the menstrual cycle in humans [16] and the mucosal infiltration of immunocytes (i.e., immunologically competent cells) in IBS patients differs between females and males [17]. Data from experimental models show that female rats are more resistant to intestinal injury and inflammation than males [18]. In females, GI permeability fluctuates throughout the estrous cycle, and ovariectomy-induced estrogen deficiency leads to compromised barrier function [19], [20]. This evidence supports that, besides the role in reproductive functions, sex steroid hormones play important roles in GI homeostasis and modulate the susceptibility of diseases, fundamentally contributing to sexual dimorphism (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Sex differences in cardiometabolic disease and the gut microbiome. GI: gastrointestinal; CVD: cardiovascular disease; T2D: type 2 diabetes.

Sex differences in cardiometabolic disease and the gut microbiome. GI: gastrointestinal; CVD: cardiovascular disease; T2D: type 2 diabetes.

Sexual dimorphism in sterolbiome

Sex steroid hormones and bile acids (BAs) share structural similarity as they are both derivatives of cholesterol which contains cyclic steroid nucleus. They can both be recycled through enterohepatic circulation—a process, in part, regulated by the gut microbiome. Therefore, the action of gut microbes on these steroids is critical in determining whether they are excreted or recycled. Various microbial modifications also alter the cytotoxicity and/or potency of these steroids. The term “sterolbiome” has been recently proposed to describe the genetic potential of the gut microbiome to produce endocrine molecules from endogenous and exogenous steroids [21]. Below, we discuss the current knowledge on the sterolbiome and its impact on sexual dimorphism and cardiometabolic disease.

Bile acids

Traditionally viewed as surfactants, BAs facilitate the absorption of lipids and fat-soluble vitamins, have antimicrobial effects, and play important signaling roles modulating glucose homeostasis, lipid metabolism, energy expenditure, and intestinal motility. Primary BAs are synthesized in the liver from cholesterol and stored in the gallbladder. Upon consumption of food, primary BA conjugates of taurine (most mammals) and glycine (humans) are secreted into the duodenum, with a large fraction then reabsorbed in the ileum. BAs that escape reabsorption modulate the composition of the gut microbial community at least in part by inhibiting growth of specific microbes [22], [23], and are subjected to microbial modification which generate secondary BAs via deconjugation, dehydrogenation, epimerization, and dehydroxylation of primary BAs. BAs with different modifications vary in their ability to activate receptors, act as antimicrobial agents, and impact host physiology. Changes in the homeostasis of BA have been associated with alterations in metabolic health: (i) a bacterial enzyme responsible for deconjugating BA has been shown to regulate lipid metabolism, adiposity, and cholesterol concentration of the host [24]; (ii) oral supplementation of a primary BA, chenodeoxycholic acid, increases brown adipose tissue activity and whole-body energy expenditure in humans [25]. (iii) a secondary BA, tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), exerts a potent metabolic effect by markedly rescuing hyperinsulinema and hepatic steatosis in genetically obese mice and increasing hepatic insulin sensitivity in obese human [26], [27], [28]; (iv) patients with T2D have altered BA profile; (v) supplementation of cholestyramine and other bile acid sequestrants, which increase fecal excretion and modify the composition of BAs, leads to improvement in circulating lipid profile [29]. Altogether, these studies emphasize the critical role of BAs homeostasis on metabolic health and highlight the importance of gut microbial modifications that determine the effects of specific BAs on metabolism. The BA pool size exhibits sexual dimorphism, although the mechanism and impact of the observed differences remain unclear. This may result in differential bile acid-dependent regulation of metabolic homeostasis and energy utilization in men vs. women. Women have been shown to have smaller BA pools than men [30]. However, BA synthesis and pool size are greatly impacted by diet, a major confounding factor for data collected from humans [31], [32]. In contrast to these observations in humans, female mice have a larger BA pool size as well as hepatic cholesterol concentrations than those observed in age-matched male mice consuming the same diet [33]. Estrogen supplementation in ovariectomized female mice, a model of human menopause, increases the gallbladder volume in wild-type mice and induces hepatic cholesterol synthesis [34]. Similarly, estrogen and progesterone elevate BA synthesis of rat hepatocytes in vitro [35]; however, estrogen represses BA synthesis in male rats [36]. In non-human primates, slower hepatic BA flow has been observed in response to estrogen supplementation [37]. The observed sexual dimorphism in BA regulation and pool size likely affects nutrient absorption, gut microbial composition, and the abundance and profile of primary and secondary bile acids that enter into the large bowel. These differences may ultimately regulate host metabolism and contribute to the sexual dimorphism in metabolic diseases. Two estrogen-specific receptors, estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30), are expressed in the smooth muscle and epithelial cells of gallbladder, respectively. The disruption of these key receptors impairs gallbladder emptying in response to a fatty meal [34]. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that activation of ERα, similar to farnesoid X receptor (FXR; a central BA sensor), suppresses BA synthesis via induction of the hepatic small heterodimer partner (SHP) transcription in liver [38]. However, the effects of ERα may vary depending on the hormonal status of the hosts. For example, pregnancy leads to elevation of serum and hepatic levels of BAs. In pregnant mice, ERα activation has an inhibitory effect on FXR, which results in downregulation of SHP depression and greater accumulation of BAs. In contrast, as mentioned above, in non-pregnant mice, activation of ERα results in lower BA levels [39]. The interactions between estrogen signaling and BA metabolism emphasize the importance of sex steroid hormones on bile acid-gut microbiome homeostasis that may contribute to sex-specific phenotypes.

Sex steroid hormones

Similar to BAs, endogenous sex steroid hormones such as androgens, estrogens, and progestogens, are derived from cholesterol. Differences in gut microbiota composition have been described between sexually-mature male and female mice, with male having less diverse gut microbiota than female littermates [40], [41], [42]. This difference is minimized with the castration of males, highlighting the influence of androgens on gut microbiome composition [40]. Although declining gradually with age, concentrations of sex steroid hormones in males are relatively stable after puberty throughout their lifespan. In contrast, women encounter more dramatic fluctuations in sex steroid hormones due to reproductive factors throughout life, which add into the complexity of hormonal effects on metabolism and the gut microbiome. Remarkably, the presence of the gut microbes is critical in maintaining a normal estrous cycle in female mice, testosterone levels in male mice, and reproductive function in both sexes [40], [41], [43]. Gut microbial metabolism affects systemic levels, potency, and the half-life of estrogen metabolites. Endogenous estrogens are synthesized by the cytochrome P450 enzyme aromatase. Aromatase converts testosterone into estradiol (17β-estradiol or E2), the most potent estrogen in humans. Estradiol, the most abundant estrogen in pre-menopausal women, is synthesized by the ovaries. Estrone (E1), a less potent estrogen, is produced in the adipose tissue through conversion from either androstenedione or estradiol. Because the ovaries cease to produce estradiol, estrone is the main form of estrogen in post-menopausal women. Estriol (E3), a metabolite derived from estradiol and estrone, is the main estrogen produced by placenta during pregnancy. These three forms of parent estrogens serve as substrates for the production of various metabolites through hydroxylation, oxidation, and conjugation (methylation, glucuronidation, and sulfonation) in the liver. Although ∼50% of conjugated estrogens are subjected to biliary excretion, only a small fraction of these metabolites appears in feces, with the majority being hydrolyzed and reabsorbed in the intestine [44], [45]. Remarkably, administration of antibiotics leads to a 60-fold increase in the fecal excretion of conjugated estrogens in pregnant women, highlighting the central role of the gut microbiome in modulating the reabsorption of estrogens [46], [47]. Bacterial sulfatases and glucuronidases are considered the main deconjugating enzymes. Among the three endogenous forms of estrogens, estriol shows the greatest degree of enterohepatic recycling (Figure 2). Gut microbes are able to cleave off sulfate and glucuronide from conjugated estrogens, allowing these estrogens to be reabsorbed. Bacterial β-glucuronidase is an enzyme largely involved in this enterohepatic recirculation. Bacterial β-glucuronidase activity is encoded by two genes, gus and BG. The Firmicutes phylum accounts for 96% of the gus gene sequences detected in human feces whereas BG gene sequences are detected both in Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes (59% and 41%, respectively) [48], [49]. Besides the deconjugation reactions, in vitro studies suggest that gut microbes are also able to convert estrone into estradiol (aerobically and anaerobically), as well as 16-α-hydroxyestrone into estriol, but this reaction has only been documented under aerobic culture conditions and may not be physiologically relevant in vivo [50]. Several gut bacterial isolates are able to form estradiol—the most potent form of estrogen, from estrone, including Slackia sp. NATTS and Bacteroides fragilis [50], [51], [52]. This interconversion has also been observed in aerobic cultures of Alcaligenes faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Mycobacterium smegmatis. Interestingly, estrogen and progesterone have been shown to replace the bacterial needs of vitamin K and promote growth of the oral plaque associated bacterium Bacteroides melaninogenicus, which has been observed at high levels during pregnancy [53]. However, the role of these bacteria in modulating estrogens and the physiological impact on the host is less clear.
Figure 2

Known microbial transformation on estrogens and androgens. The degree of enterohepatic recirculation of two forms of endogenous estrogens varies greatly among host species [143]. However, estriol exhibits significant enterohepatic recycling. Conjugation of estrogens with sulfate and glucuronide occurs largely in liver, resulting in compounds such as estriol-3-sulfate-16-glucuronide (E3-3-S-16-G). This conjugated estrogenic metabolite is then subjected to excretion via the intestinal tract. Gut microbial sulfatases can hydrolyze E3-3-S-16-G to E3-16-G, which can return to the liver for excretion or reconjugation or be hydrolyzed further into free E3 by bacterial β-glucuronidase for reabsorption. Gut microbes can also reconjugate free E3 into E3-3-G, which is then subjected to excretion. Moreover, in vitro studies suggest that gut microbes are able to convert estrone into estradiol (aerobically and anaerobically), as well as 16-α-hydroxyestrone into estriol, but this reaction has only been shown to occur in the presence of oxygen [50]. Similarly, conjugated androgens can be hydrolyzed in the intestinal tract via bacterial β-glucuronidase into free androgens for reabsorption. Further, glucocorticoids can be converted it into androgens via side-chain cleaving capacity of bacterial desABCD-encoded enzymes.

Known microbial transformation on estrogens and androgens. The degree of enterohepatic recirculation of two forms of endogenous estrogens varies greatly among host species [143]. However, estriol exhibits significant enterohepatic recycling. Conjugation of estrogens with sulfate and glucuronide occurs largely in liver, resulting in compounds such as estriol-3-sulfate-16-glucuronide (E3-3-S-16-G). This conjugated estrogenic metabolite is then subjected to excretion via the intestinal tract. Gut microbial sulfatases can hydrolyze E3-3-S-16-G to E3-16-G, which can return to the liver for excretion or reconjugation or be hydrolyzed further into free E3 by bacterial β-glucuronidase for reabsorption. Gut microbes can also reconjugate free E3 into E3-3-G, which is then subjected to excretion. Moreover, in vitro studies suggest that gut microbes are able to convert estrone into estradiol (aerobically and anaerobically), as well as 16-α-hydroxyestrone into estriol, but this reaction has only been shown to occur in the presence of oxygen [50]. Similarly, conjugated androgens can be hydrolyzed in the intestinal tract via bacterial β-glucuronidase into free androgens for reabsorption. Further, glucocorticoids can be converted it into androgens via side-chain cleaving capacity of bacterial desABCD-encoded enzymes. Several studies have assessed compositional changes in the gut microbiota in response to ovariectomy. Loss of ovarian hormone production leads to distinct gut microbiota composition when fed a high-fat/high-sucrose semi-purified diet in Sprague-Dawley rats and two stains of mice (C57BL/6J and DBA/2J) [54], [55]. Yet, this effect is not observed when mice were fed a natural ingredient based-rodent chow [54]. Similarly, others have found limited signals of ovariectomy on overall gut microbiota composition when feeding natural ingredient-based diets in rats [56], [57]. Nonetheless, Cox-York and colleagues demonstrated ovariectomy effect on gut microbial composition in low-capacity running rats feeding a natural ingredient-based diet [58]. The impact of loss of ovarian hormone production on gut microbiome is likely highly sensitive to diets and specific to host species and strains. For instance, natural ingredients diets commonly contain high and inconsistent level of phytoestrogens, which vary in composition and abundance among production lots. Phytoestrogens are plant-derived compounds that have a structure similar to endogenous estrogens synthesized from the mammalian endocrine system and are generally viewed as natural compounds that exert health benefits with anti-atherosclerotic, anti-cancer, and anti-osteoporotic properties [59]. Due to their structural similarity to endogenous estrogens, phytoestrogens can bind to ER (both ERα and ERβ) and act as estrogen agonists or antagonists. There are three major classes of phytoestrogens, including isoflavones, lignans, and coumestans. Isoflavones usually exist in food as biologically inactive forms, such as genistin and daidzin, that are present in soy as β-D-glycosides, which can be become biologically active aglycone forms via hydrolyzation and deconjugation through bacterial β-glycosidases present in the gut microbiome. Therefore, inclusion of phytoestrogens in the diet may directly and/or indirectly mask the changes of gut microbiome in response to the loss of ovarian hormone production at both compositional and functional level. Alternatively, other components in the diets may also contribute to the inconsistent results, such as variation in the types and abundance of dietary fibers in natural ingredient diets. Altogether, perturbation of ovariectomy-associated gut microbiota on host physiology and metabolism needs to be examined using highly controlled diets free of dietary phytoestrogens. Supplementation of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri elevates circulating testosterone, enough to prevent age-associated testicular atrophy in mice [60]. Germ-free non-obese diabetic (NOD) male mice have lower systemic testosterone levels compared to conventionally-raised counterparts [41]. Additionally, inoculation of the gut microbiome from male NOD mice into female NOD mice elevates circulating testosterone levels of the female recipients and exerts a protective effect against type 1 diabetes (T1D) [41]. This evidence highlights the interactions between testosterone and the gut microbiome, which are sufficient to influence host phenotypes. Similar to estrogens, androgens also go through significant enterohepatic recirculation through deconjugation via the gut microbiome. Bacterial β-glucuronidase cleaves off glucuronide from androgen conjugates, releasing free androgens for reabsorption [61], [62]. Furthermore, the gut microbiome also modulates glucocorticoids and androgens through reductive and oxidative reactions [63], [64]. Androgens, such as androstenedione and testosterone, are C-19 steroids derived from C-27 cholesterol through reductive reactions. These androgens can then be converted into C-18 estrogens. The ability of gut microbes to convert steroids anaerobically through side-chain cleavage has been known for decades [65], [66], but the pathways involved have only been recently identified. Work from Riddlon and colleagues has revealed that the side-chain cleavage product of glucocorticoids generated by the human gut bacterium Clostridium scindens is an androgen, 11β-hydroxyandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (11β-OHA). This work also identified a cortisol-inducible operon (desABCD) encoding (i) the enzyme involved in anaerobic side-chain cleavage (DesC, a 20α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [HSDH]), (ii) a putative transketolase (encoded by desAB) which is hypothesized to have steroid-17,20-desmolase/oxidase activity, and (iii) a possible corticosteroid transporter (encoded by desD) [64]. This conversion may potentially impact testosterone concentrations in vivo. While further work is required to ascertain the host phenotypes affected by these bacterial functions, modulation of sex steroid hormones through bacterial β-glucuronidase and desABCD-encoded enzymes may result in changes in local and systemic levels of steroid compounds that ultimately impact host hormonal homeostasis.

Gastrointestinal tract and sexual dimorphism

GI tract physiology

There are several factors related to the GI tract may contribute to the sex-associated differences observed in gut microbiome composition. These include varying GI motility due to sex hormones that impact GI transit time and the distribution and effector response of the estrogen and/or androgen receptors along the GI tract. Pre-menopausal women have slower gastric emptying and greater GI transit time than men; this difference disappears in post-menopausal women who are not on hormone replacement therapy [67], [68]. Differences in GI transit time likely affects the time gut microbes are in contact with dietary substrates, hence impacting fermentation and accumulation of metabolites. End-products of fermentation can alter the pH within the GI tract and consequently, impact microbiota composition, as pH imposes a selective pressure on microbial growth and metabolism that is differentially tolerated among bacteria (e.g., acidic pH dramatically affects the growth of Bacteroides species, but to a significantly lower extent the growth of Gram-positive bacteria [69]). Sex steroid hormones are thought to be the main contributor to the sexual dimorphism observed in GI transit time [70], [71], [72], [73], [74]. The luteal phase of the menstrual cycles and during the second and third trimester of the pregnancy, when the concentrations of estrogen and progesterone are both elevated, have been associated with prolonged GI transit time; however, these findings have not been consistent among studies [70], [71], [72]. Administration of estrogen inhibits gastric emptying in intact diestrus and ovariectomized female rats, resulting in prolonged GI transit time, whereas progesterone has opposite effects [73]. When administering a combination of estrogen and progesterone to ovariectomized rats, the effect of estrogen dominates, and gastric emptying is inhibited. In contrast, testosterone does not impact the rate of gastric emptying in castrated male rats, suggesting the role of estrogens but not testosterone on GI motility [73]. Interestingly, both estrogen and progesterone inhibit gastric emptying in intact male rats [74]. The mechanisms by which sex steroid hormones modulate GI motility may be multifaceted and segment dependent, possible due to the distribution of ligand-binding receptors. In both males and females, transcriptional effects of estrogens are thought to be mediated partly by nuclear ER through ligand-binding activation, which then initiates transcription of target genes involved in metabolism, development, reproduction, and homeostasis via recognition of ER (this mode of signaling of estrogens if often referred as the genomic pathway). There are at least two types of ER that are currently known, ERα and ERβ. ERα, the “original ER”, was cloned and characterized in 1985 [75]. ERβ was not discovered until 1996 [76]. Since then, at least five isoforms of ERβ have been identified [77], [78]. ERβ is poorly understood and widely distributed among many tissues that were previously thought to be estrogen-insensitive, including the gastrointestinal tract. The ratio and predominance of ERα and ERβ expression varies along the GI tract, and the mapping of these receptors in the GI tract have been inconsistent among studies, varying among species, sex, and hormonal status. Nonetheless, ERβ has been consistently shown to be the predominant form of the ER in colon of men, women, and developing fetuses [79], [80]. Additionally, while some studies detected greater colonic expression of ERβ in women than men, these differences have not been consistently observed [80], [81], [82]. Given the prevalence of ERβ in the GI tract, elucidating the tissue distribution and functions of ERβ will likely enhance our understanding of sex-dependent GI physiology. Other than the classic genomic (transcriptional) signaling pathway, GPR30 (also known as G-protein coupled estrogen receptor) is now recognized as the receptor of non-genomic (rapid) signaling of estrogen. GPR30 is expressed in both gastric fundic gland and colonic tissue [83], [84]. Estradiol is a highly specific ligand of GPR30, whereas estrone and estriol exhibit very low affinities [85], [86]. In contrast, progesterone, testosterone and cortisol do not bind to GPR30 [86]. Therefore, the known sex differences in GI motility and disease susceptibility may also be regulated through the non-genomic signaling of sex hormones. The localization of progesterone and androgen receptors in the GI tract of males and females is poorly defined for both sexes. The expression of progesterone receptors has been observed in the colon of women; whereas the expression of androgen receptors has been detected in the intestine of female and male fetuses [87], [88]. The distribution and localization of the sex hormone receptors and the abundance and potency of differential sex hormones in male and female may both contribute to the observed sexual dimorphism in GI-related disorder and further influence gut microbial communities.

Gut barrier function

The lining of the GI tract is primarily formed by a layer of epithelial cells held together by the tight junctions, along with a mucus layer coating the top of the epithelium and creating a physical barrier that separates host cells from luminal contents. This dynamic structure is an important first line of defense that prevents inflammatory macromolecules (e.g., lipopolysaccharides [LPS]) and bacteria from entering systemic circulation. The GI tract epithelium has a rapid (2–6 days) turnover in most adult mammals. This process is initiated by the epithelial stem cells located near the base of the crypts. ERβ is preferentially expressed in stem cells and regulates cellular differentiation [89], [90]. Colonic tissue from ERβ−/- mice exhibits epithelial hyperproliferation, incomplete differentiation, and increased shedding, highlighting a key role of sex steroid hormones on maintaining epithelial homeostasis and integrity of the colon [89]. The mucus that coats the colon consists predominantly of mucin-2 (MUC2), which is generated and secreted by intestinal goblet cells. Estrogen has also been shown to dramatically increase mucin content in mucin-producing intestinal epithelial cells in vitro and deletion of ERβ leads to disorganization of the colon mucin layer in mice [89], [91]. Female mice are protected against intestinal injury during proestrus stage (high estrogen) compared to diestrus stage (low and stable estrogen) and compared to male mice [18], [92]. In fact, diestrus female mice and male mice have similar mucus thickness within the colon [93]. Altogether, these studies support the notion that estrogens play an important role in maintaining the health of the intestinal epithelium and integrity of the GI mucus layers through ERβ signaling. Obesity leads to a compromised intestinal barrier function characterized by disrupted tight junctions, resulting in increased paracellular permeability which allows pro-inflammatory molecules such as bacterial LPS into systemic circulation [94], [95]. As a cellular component of gram-negative bacteria, LPS is a potent inflammatory mediator that is recognized mainly through the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Subcutaneous infusion of LPS leads to weight gain, adiposity, hepatic insulin resistance, and liver triglycerides in rodent models [96]. Similarly, higher plasma levels of LPS have been reported in obese patients relative to lean and healthy individuals [97], [98]. Estrogens promote gut barrier function not only by increasing mucus production as mentioned above but also through ERβ-mediated upregulation of tight junction transmembrane proteins, in both male and ovariectomized female rodent models and in vitro monolayer cultures [18], [19], [99]. Similar protective effects of estrogen have been observed in the vaginal epithelium [100]. In contrast, a recent study showed that estrogen decreases tight junction protein zonula occludens 1 (ZO-1) expression in primary colonic tissues isolated from post-menopausal women and men [101]. Consistent with this finding, the effect of hormone supplementation in metabolic health of post-menopausal women contrasts to those observed in pre-menopausal women, suggesting that the loss of ovarian function due to menopause may have profound and differential impact on estrogen signaling compared to pre-menopausal women [102], [103], [104]. Temporal and regional changes on GI permeability via tight junction disruption have been recently shown in ovariectomized mice, suggesting that loss of ovarian function alters the homeostasis of GI integrity in time-sensitive manner though dynamic adaptations [105].

The role of gut microbiome on sexual dimorphism of cardiometabolic dysfunction

Microbiota transplant experiments in germ-free mice have recently demonstrated that the sex of the recipient animal shapes the composition of the gut microbiota [42]. Additionally, sex influences susceptibility and severity of various diseases, including CVD, obesity, T1D, and gastrointestinal disorders, as discussed above. Emerging evidence suggests that sex-associated differences in gut microbiota composition may contribute to sex-specific susceptibility to disease. For example, females are known to be more susceptible to T1D than males, a phenomenon that has been observed in both humans and rodents. However, this sex-bias in disease susceptibility does not exist in germ-free NOD mice (a mouse model of T1D) [40]. Gut microbiota composition differs between sexually-mature male and female NOD mice with males having greater relative abundance of several genera including Roseburia, Coprococcus, and Bilophilia [41]. Furthermore, cecal microbial transplants from male to female increase the circulating testosterone levels and significantly decrease the incidence of T1D among recipients [41]. While the sexual dimorphism in disease susceptibility may be due to either the distinct sex steroid hormones or sex chromosome, sex hormones appear to be the major component driving the gut microbiota differences between males and females. For instance, male and female NOD mice exhibit similar gut microbiomes up to puberty; differences do not appear until adulthood/postpubescent stage [40], [41]. Removal of endogenous source of androgens through castration of male mice results in a gut microbial community that shows similar composition to those of intact female littermates and increases T1D incidence [40], [106]. Altogether, these results highlight the complex interactions between microbes and sex hormones and support the notion that this microbes-hormonal interplay alters disease susceptibility. Obesity is one of the major public health crises of the 21st century and the leading contributor of numerous chronic diseases, including insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease [107]. In obese subjects, sexual dimorphism results in differential distribution of adipose tissue deposition. Women typically have ∼10% higher body fat than men, with most fat deposition occurs in the subcutaneous/peripheral adipose tissues around the hip and thigh area (i.e., pear-shaped body). Men, on the other hand, tend to have an apple-shaped configuration with deposition of more visceral adipose tissues, which is associated with higher risks to obesity-related comorbidities [108]. Female mice are partially protected against high-fat diet induced obesity, whereby the onset of obesity is delayed relative to males [12]. Estrogens reduce inflammation by inhibiting NF-κB translocation into the nucleus, which is typically induced by bacterial LPS [109], [110], [111] and other pro-inflammatory molecules (e.g., bacterial peptidoglycan) [112]. Furthermore, microbial metabolism of sex steroid hormones may impact the potency and affinity of estrogen-derived agonists on ERs, which, in turn, would impact the downstream metabolic and inflammatory pathways. Interestingly, low total testosterone concentrations in older men have been associated with high fasting glucose and insulin resistance, whereas high bioavailable testosterone in older women predicts insulin resistance and incidences of T2D [113]. This sexual dimorphism of testosterone-associated insulin resistance may be due to hormonal homeostasis prior to aging, whereby the androgenic activity is normally low in women but maximized in men. Interactions between the gut microbiome and host metabolism likely contribute to the sex differences in obesity and related comorbidities. Moreover, the inherent hormonal status of the hosts may add another layer of complexity to the etiology of sex-biases in this disease development. During the third trimester of pregnancy, an increased maternal bacterial load within the gut and significant remodeling of the gut microbiome has been reported [114], [115]. Maternal stress during pregnancy has been associated with lasting sex-specific differential impact on obesity, with male offspring but not females having a significantly higher risk of obesity in adulthood [116]. Smoking during pregnancy has been associated with alteration in meconium microbiota and linked with increased risk of childhood obesity in the male offspring, but not females [117], [118]. Although it is difficult to dissect the direct impact of the maternal gut microbiome on the offspring, modulation of the infant gut microbiota through shaping the prenatal maternal gut microbiome has been demonstrated by administering probiotics to pregnant women 14 days prior to C-section [119]. CVD is the leading cause of death worldwide [120], [121]. As discussed earlier, pre-menopausal women are less likely to have cardiovascular events than men. Women tend to be 10 years older than men at the onset of coronary heart disease and as much as 20 years older than men for cardiac events such as myocardial infarction [122], [123]. However, the prognosis of myocardial infarction is worse in women compared to men [123], [124]. Sex differences in CVD risks have also been demonstrated in rodent models, although the sex-bias differs from humans. The size of atherosclerotic plaque lesions and number of fatty steaks in mice fed a cholesterol-rich diet is significantly greater in females as compared to age-matched and diet-matched males [125], [126]. This sex-dependent difference in atherosclerosis is also observed across many strains of mice [127]. The current knowledge of how the gut microbiome affect sex differences in CVD is quite limited, but evidence supports the contributions of both gut microbiota and the expression of hepatic flavin monooxygenases 3 (FMO3) on sex-dependent development of CVD. Gut microbial metabolism of dietary carnitine and choline (mainly consumed as phosphatidylcholine [lecithin]) results in the production of trimethylamine (TMA), which is rapidly absorbed into portal vein and subsequently converted into TMAO by host hepatic FMO3. Several clinical studies have shown that plasma levels of TMAO are independently associated with incident CVD development and adverse event risks [128], [129], [130], [131], [132]. Recent studies showed that TMAO exacerbates development of CVD, in part by enhancing platelet reactivity and thrombosis potential [128], [129], [130], [131]. Plasma TMAO levels and atherosclerotic lesions are much greater in ApoE−/- female mice relative to their male counterparts [130]. Hepatic FMO3 expression and activity are also significantly higher in female than male mice [133]. Ovariectomized mice show a modest decrease in hepatic FMO3 expression and plasma TMAO levels compared to intact female mice. In contrast, castrated male mice show a more than 100-fold increase in hepatic Fmo3 mRNA levels as well as a 7-fold increase in circulating levels of TMAO compared to intact males, and this response is blunted by treatment with dihydrotestosterone. These effects are likely mediated through FXR because (i) FMO3 expression is an FXR target gene, (ii) FXR activation induces FMO3 and increases plasma TMAO, and (iii) androsterone, a major testosterone degradation product, is a potent FXR agonist [134]. While sex differences of hepatic FMO3 expression are observed in humans, no sex differences in circulating levels of TMAO have been observed in humans [135]. The link between this gut microbial-dependent metabolite and sexual dimorphism of CVD needs to be further examined. In addition to sex steroid hormones, sex chromosomes could contribute to the observed sex differences in metabolic traits. The presence of female (XX) vs. male (XY) sex chromosome ultimately determines the type and levels of the sex steroid hormones of an individual. Therefore, it is difficult to discern the cause of an observed sex-associated metabolic difference between sex chromosome complement and steroid hormone differences. One of the most widely used models to dissect these two factors is known as the four core genotypes (FCG) mouse model, which includes XX chromosome and XY chromosome on both females and male gonadal background [136]. In both males and females, removal of gonads abolishes the differences in FMO3 gene expression among FCG strains, suggesting that the sex differences on hepatic FMO3 expression are due to sex steroid hormones [135]. On the other hand, sex chromosomes appear to contribute greatly to the sex differences in systemic lipid profiles [137]. In humans, men tend to have greater low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and triglyceride levels, and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) levels compared to pre-menopausal women. Lipoprotein profiles are altered in women after menopause to levels similar to those of men, which leads to increased risks of CVD and metabolic dysfunction. This cardiometabolic dysfunction is thought to be caused by deficiency of sex steroid hormones, mainly estrogens. Paradoxically, estrogen supplementation in post-menopausal women can lead to unexpected consequences, including an increase in blood clotting and coronary events within the first year of treatment [102], [103], [104], suggesting that the etiology of menopause-associated CVD is complex and multifaceted. Using the FCG mouse model, the role of sex chromosome complement vs. sex steroid hormones on systemic lipid levels were assessed. Regardless of sex or existence of gonads, XX mice have greater HDL-c levels than XY mice, highlighting the importance of sex chromosomes in CVD risks [137]. Much work remains to be done to determine the relevance of sex differences in CVD risks, and how the sex-associated differential lipid profiles are associated with gut microbiome. The gut microbiome is highly sensitive to environmental perturbation; therefore, variations in diet, hormonal status, exercise (duration and intensity), and stress levels should be considered when designing microbiome studies in humans. Furthermore, genetic variations also shape the human gut microbiome in humans and rodents [138], [139]. A study analyzing the gut microbiome of 89 distinct inbred mouse strains showed that the gut microbial differences between male and females varies as a function of host genotype [54]. For example, female BXD79/RwwJ mice have greater relative abundance of Roseburia than male, but the same taxon is more abundant in the gut microbial community of male BXD85/Rww mice than females, suggesting that host genetics could mask the sex differences on the gut microbial community [54], [93], [140]. Further, it has been shown that gut microbiota differences are mediated by sex hormones and the influences of gonadectomy on bile acid profiles significantly differ between sexes [54]. Of note, the relationship between sex chromosome and the gut microbiome has not been assessed, even though gene variance on the Y chromosome has been associated with sex differences in cardiovascular traits, contributing to dyslipidemia, hypertension, inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary heart disease [141], [142]. Thus, the potential influence of gene variants on the sex chromosomes on the colonization of the gut microbiome should not be overlooked.

Conclusion and future directions

Sexual dimorphism in cardiometabolic disease is evident, but the mechanisms involved remain largely unknown. In the past decade, many studies have linked cardiometabolic dysfunction with alterations in the gut microbiome. Although emerging evidence suggests a role of the gut microbiome as a modifier of disease, its impact on differential suceptibility to cardiometabolic disease due to sex is lacking. The gut microbiome is critical in maintaining normal estrous cycle, testosterone level, and reproductive function. Elucidating the role of gut microbiome in sex-biased susceptibility to cardiometabolic disease is of high relevance to public health. Metagenomic, metatranscriptomic and metabolomic analyses are warranted to characterize the functional changes in the gut microbiome in response to alterations in sex hormones and to identify sex-specific signals that modulate microbial community composition and activity. Identifying host and microbial genes responsible for selective gut microbial colonization due to sex may contribute to novel approaches in disease prevention. Furthermore, unlike polymorphisms in our human genomes, gut microbial community composition can be rapidly modified through diet or drugs, opening the door to new approaches in translational and personalized medicine.
  140 in total

1.  You've come a long way, baby: cardiovascular health and disease in women: problems and prospects.

Authors:  Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Host Genotype and Gut Microbiome Modulate Insulin Secretion and Diet-Induced Metabolic Phenotypes.

Authors:  Julia H Kreznar; Mark P Keller; Lindsay L Traeger; Mary E Rabaglia; Kathryn L Schueler; Donald S Stapleton; Wen Zhao; Eugenio I Vivas; Brian S Yandell; Aimee Teo Broman; Bruno Hagenbuch; Alan D Attie; Federico E Rey
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Low-dose brain estrogen prevents menopausal syndrome while maintaining the diversity of the gut microbiomes in estrogen-deficient rats.

Authors:  Sunmin Park; Da Sol Kim; Eun Seon Kang; Da Bin Kim; Suna Kang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.310

4.  Meconium microbiota types dominated by lactic acid or enteric bacteria are differentially associated with maternal eczema and respiratory problems in infants.

Authors:  M J Gosalbes; S Llop; Y Vallès; A Moya; F Ballester; M P Francino
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.018

5.  Distinct composition of gut microbiota during pregnancy in overweight and normal-weight women.

Authors:  Maria Carmen Collado; Erika Isolauri; Kirsi Laitinen; Seppo Salminen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Effects of sex steroid hormones on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit in rats.

Authors:  T S Chen; M L Doong; F Y Chang; S D Lee; P S Wang
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-01

7.  Gender-related differences in bile acid and sterol metabolism in outbred CD-1 mice fed low- and high-cholesterol diets.

Authors:  S D Turley; M Schwarz; D K Spady; J M Dietschy
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  17beta-estradiol inhibits inflammatory gene expression by controlling NF-kappaB intracellular localization.

Authors:  Serena Ghisletti; Clara Meda; Adriana Maggi; Elisabetta Vegeto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Inheritance of coronary artery disease in men: an analysis of the role of the Y chromosome.

Authors:  Fadi J Charchar; Lisa Ds Bloomer; Timothy A Barnes; Mark J Cowley; Christopher P Nelson; Yanzhong Wang; Matthew Denniff; Radoslaw Debiec; Paraskevi Christofidou; Scott Nankervis; Anna F Dominiczak; Ahmed Bani-Mustafa; Anthony J Balmforth; Alistair S Hall; Jeanette Erdmann; Francois Cambien; Panos Deloukas; Christian Hengstenberg; Chris Packard; Heribert Schunkert; Willem H Ouwehand; Ian Ford; Alison H Goodall; Mark A Jobling; Nilesh J Samani; Maciej Tomaszewski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Ovariectomy results in differential shifts in gut microbiota in low versus high aerobic capacity rats.

Authors:  Kimberly A Cox-York; Amy M Sheflin; Michelle T Foster; Christopher L Gentile; Amber Kahl; Lauren G Koch; Steven L Britton; Tiffany L Weir
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-08
View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in metabolism and cardiometabolic disorders.

Authors:  Karthickeyan Chella Krishnan; Margarete Mehrabian; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.776

2.  Androgen receptor blockade promotes response to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy.

Authors:  Christopher P Vellano; Michael G White; Miles C Andrews; Manoj Chelvanambi; Russell G Witt; Joseph R Daniele; Mark Titus; Jennifer L McQuade; Fabio Conforti; Elizabeth M Burton; Matthew J Lastrapes; Gabriel Ologun; Alexandria P Cogdill; Golnaz Morad; Peter Prieto; Alexander J Lazar; Yanshuo Chu; Guangchun Han; M A Wadud Khan; Beth Helmink; Michael A Davies; Rodabe N Amaria; Jeffrey J Kovacs; Scott E Woodman; Sapna Patel; Patrick Hwu; Michael Peoples; Jeffrey E Lee; Zachary A Cooper; Haifeng Zhu; Guang Gao; Hiya Banerjee; Mike Lau; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Anthony Lucci; Emily Z Keung; Merrick I Ross; Laura Pala; Eleonora Pagan; Rossana Lazcano Segura; Qian Liu; Mikayla S Borthwick; Eric Lau; Melinda S Yates; Shannon N Westin; Khalida Wani; Michael T Tetzlaff; Lauren E Haydu; Mikhila Mahendra; XiaoYan Ma; Christopher Logothetis; Zachary Kulstad; Sarah Johnson; Courtney W Hudgens; Ningping Feng; Lorenzo Federico; Georgina V Long; P Andrew Futreal; Swathi Arur; Hussein A Tawbi; Amy E Moran; Linghua Wang; Timothy P Heffernan; Joseph R Marszalek; Jennifer A Wargo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 69.504

Review 3.  Sex differences in the intergenerational inheritance of metabolic traits.

Authors:  Ionel Sandovici; Denise S Fernandez-Twinn; Antonia Hufnagel; Miguel Constância; Susan E Ozanne
Journal:  Nat Metab       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 4.  Gut Microbiota and Sex Hormones: Crosstalking Players in Cardiometabolic and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Silvia Maffei; Francesca Forini; Paola Canale; Giuseppina Nicolini; Letizia Guiducci
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Association Between Sex Hormone Levels and Gut Microbiota Composition and Diversity-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Manfredi d'Afflitto; Advait Upadhyaya; Alicia Green; Madusha Peiris
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2022 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 3.174

Review 6.  The microgenderome revealed: sex differences in bidirectional interactions between the microbiota, hormones, immunity and disease susceptibility.

Authors:  Ravichandra Vemuri; Kristyn E Sylvia; Sabra L Klein; Samuel C Forster; Magdalena Plebanski; Raj Eri; Katie L Flanagan
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 9.623

7.  Bacterial diversity in intestinal mucosa of mice fed with Dendrobium officinale and high-fat diet.

Authors:  Xiaoya Li; Xinxin Peng; Kangxiao Guo; Zhoujin Tan
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Sex is associated with differences in gut microbial composition and function in hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Krishnakant Saboo; Amirhossein Shamsaddini; Mihir V Iyer; Chang Hu; Andrew Fagan; Edith A Gavis; Melanie B White; Michael Fuchs; Douglas M Heuman; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; Ravishankar K Iyer; Patrick M Gillevet; Jasmohan S Bajaj
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Effects of dietary macronutrient profile on apparent total tract macronutrient digestibility and fecal microbiota, fermentative metabolites, and bile acids of female dogs after spay surgery.

Authors:  Thunyaporn Phungviwatnikul; Celeste Alexander; Sungho Do; Fei He; Jan S Suchodolski; Maria R C de Godoy; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

10.  Firmicutes in Gut Microbiota Correlate with Blood Testosterone Levels in Elderly Men.

Authors:  Makoto Matsushita; Kazutoshi Fujita; Daisuke Motooka; Koji Hatano; Junya Hata; Mitsuhisa Nishimoto; Eri Banno; Kentaro Takezawa; Shinichiro Fukuhara; Hiroshi Kiuchi; Yue Pan; Toshifumi Takao; Akira Tsujimura; Shinichi Yachida; Shota Nakamura; Wataru Obara; Hirotsugu Uemura; Norio Nonomura
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.