Literature DB >> 14685940

Coronary heart disease: the female heart is vulnerable.

Nanette K Wenger1.   

Abstract

During the past decade, an overall theme has emerged, validating the exploration of gender-based differences in coronary heart disease (CHD) as a basis for clinical strategies to improve outcomes for women. Underrepresentation of women in most of CHD and lack of gender-specific reporting in many clinical trials continue to limit the available knowledge and evidence-based medicine needed to devise optimal managements for women with CHD. Control of conventional coronary risk factors provides comparable cardioprotection for men and women. Current evidence fails to show cardiac protection from menopausal hormone therapy. Clinical presentations of coronary heart disease (CHD) and management strategies differ between the sexes. Underutilization of proven beneficial therapies is a contributor to less-favorable outcomes in women. The contemporary increased application of appropriate diagnostic, therapeutic, and interventional managements has favorably altered the prognosis for women, particularly when the data are adjusted for baseline characteristics. Better education of women during office visits, earlier and more aggressive control of coronary risk factors, and a greater index of suspicion regarding chest pain and its appropriate evaluation may help to reverse the trend of late referral and late intervention. Research indicates that behavioral changes on the part of women and reshaping of practice patterns by their health care providers may dramatically reduce the number of women disabled and killed by CHD each year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14685940     DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2003.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 0033-0620            Impact factor:   8.194


  27 in total

1.  Coronary heart disease in women.

Authors:  Ghada W Mikhail
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-03

2.  The boomers are coming: a total cost of care model of the impact of population aging on health care costs in the United States by Major Practice Category.

Authors:  E Mary Martini; Nancy Garrett; Tammie Lindquist; George J Isham
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Gavin L Noble; Gary V Heller
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Hypertension in pregnancy is a risk factor for peripheral arterial disease decades after pregnancy.

Authors:  Tracey L Weissgerber; Stephen T Turner; Kent R Bailey; Thomas H Mosley; Sharon L R Kardia; Heather J Wiste; Virginia M Miller; Iftikhar J Kullo; Vesna D Garovic
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.162

5.  Innovations in translational sex and gender-sensitive tobacco research.

Authors:  Sherry A McKee; Andrea H Weinberger
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 6.  Sex/gender differences in smoking cessation: A review.

Authors:  Philip H Smith; Andrew J Bessette; Andrea H Weinberger; Christine E Sheffer; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Sex preferences in cardiovascular testing: the contribution of the patient-physician discussion.

Authors:  Katie E Golden; Anna Marie Chang; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  The Association of Tobacco Use and Gender to Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes: A Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  Andrea H Weinberger; Carolyn M Mazure; Sherry A McKee; Teresa Caulin-Glaser
Journal:  J Subst Use       Date:  2014-03-01

9.  Low bone mass is associated with carotid atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.

Authors:  J Tamaki; M Iki; Y Hirano; Y Sato; E Kajita; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Gender differences in presentation and diagnosis of chest pain in primary care.

Authors:  Stefan Bösner; Jörg Haasenritter; Maren A Hani; Heidi Keller; Andreas C Sönnichsen; Konstantinos Karatolios; Juergen R Schaefer; Erika Baum; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.