Peter A Lichtenberg1, Rebecca Campbell2, LaToya Hall1, Evan Z Gross2. 1. Department of Psychology, Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. 2. Institute of Gerontology and Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Context can influence or overwhelm the intellectual and cognitive aspects of financial decision making but has only recently received increased attention. The construct validity of conceptual subscales from a financial decision-making scale was examined in the context of their relationship to financial exploitation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-two community-based participants were recruited into the study. The final sample contained 242 participants. Measures included demographic variables, conceptually derived contextual items, and neurocognitive measures. Seventeen of the 34 contextual items investigated differentiated financially exploited and nonexploited older adults. Combining these 17 contextual items led to the creation of a new scale: the Financial Exploitation Vulnerability Scale (FEVS). Correlational analyses and area under the curve analyses were used to examine the relationship between this new scale of contextual items and other measures and to determine how clinically meaningful the scale was in the current sample. RESULTS: Contextual items were powerful discriminators between those who were exploited and those who were not. The new scale of contextual items (the FEVS) demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82) and a strong area under the curve (receiver operating characteristic = 0.80), thereby indicating good clinical significance and evidence for construct validity. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We examined the conceptually derived subscales of financial awareness, psychological vulnerability, and relationship strain and how these relate to financial exploitation. Our major finding is that contextual items differentiated between exploited and nonexploited adults, which demonstrate the importance of measuring context in financial decision making and exploitation. A new scale for measuring contextual items was introduced.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Context can influence or overwhelm the intellectual and cognitive aspects of financial decision making but has only recently received increased attention. The construct validity of conceptual subscales from a financial decision-making scale was examined in the context of their relationship to financial exploitation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-two community-based participants were recruited into the study. The final sample contained 242 participants. Measures included demographic variables, conceptually derived contextual items, and neurocognitive measures. Seventeen of the 34 contextual items investigated differentiated financially exploited and nonexploited older adults. Combining these 17 contextual items led to the creation of a new scale: the Financial Exploitation Vulnerability Scale (FEVS). Correlational analyses and area under the curve analyses were used to examine the relationship between this new scale of contextual items and other measures and to determine how clinically meaningful the scale was in the current sample. RESULTS: Contextual items were powerful discriminators between those who were exploited and those who were not. The new scale of contextual items (the FEVS) demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82) and a strong area under the curve (receiver operating characteristic = 0.80), thereby indicating good clinical significance and evidence for construct validity. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We examined the conceptually derived subscales of financial awareness, psychological vulnerability, and relationship strain and how these relate to financial exploitation. Our major finding is that contextual items differentiated between exploited and nonexploited adults, which demonstrate the importance of measuring context in financial decision making and exploitation. A new scale for measuring contextual items was introduced.
Authors: David Burnes; Charles R Henderson; Christine Sheppard; Rebecca Zhao; Karl Pillemer; Mark S Lachs Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Peter Alexander Lichtenberg; Michael A Sugarman; Daniel Paulson; Lisa J Ficker; Annalise Rahman-Filipiak Journal: Clin Gerontol Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 2.619
Authors: Peter A Lichtenberg; Jonathan Stoltman; Lisa J Ficker; Madelyn Iris; Benjamin Mast Journal: Clin Gerontol Date: 2015-01-01 Impact factor: 2.619
Authors: Christopher C Stewart; Lei Yu; Crystal M Glover; Gary Mottola; David A Bennett; Robert S Wilson; Patricia A Boyle Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2020-11-23
Authors: S Duke Han; Lisa L Barnes; Sue Leurgans; Lei Yu; Christopher C Stewart; Melissa Lamar; Crystal M Glover; David A Bennett; Patricia A Boyle Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-07-12