| Literature DB >> 29882783 |
Poonam Kalhotra1, Veera C S R Chittepu2, Guillermo Osorio-Revilla3, Tzayhri Gallardo-Velázquez4.
Abstract
Numerous studies indicate that diets with a variety of fruits and vegetables decrease the incidence of severe diseases, like diabetes, obesity, and cancer. Diets contain a variety of bioactive compounds, and their features, like diverge scaffolds, and structural complexity make them the most successful source of potential leads or hits in the process of drug discovery and drug development. Recently, novel serine protease dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors played a role in the management of diabetes, obesity, and cancer. This study describes the development of field template, field-based qualitative structure⁻activity relationship (SAR) model demonstrating DPP-4 inhibitors of natural origin, and the same model is used to screen virtually focused food database composed of polyphenols as potential DPP-4 inhibitors. Compounds’ similarity to field template, and novelty score “high and very high”, were used as primary criteria to identify novel DPP-4 inhibitors. Molecular docking simulations were performed on the resulting natural compounds using FlexX algorithm. Finally, one natural compound, chrysin, was chosen to be evaluated experimentally to demonstrate the applicability of constructed SAR model. This study provides the molecular insights necessary in the discovery of new leads as DPP-4 inhibitors, to improve the potency of existing DPP-4 natural inhibitors.Entities:
Keywords: dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme; field-based virtual screening; molecular docking; natural products; structure–activity relationship model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29882783 PMCID: PMC6100528 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23061368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Representation of four template compounds inhibiting DPP-4 activity and identification of three-dimensional bioactive conformations on the basis of field points generated using field template tool.
Natural products proven to inhibit dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme activity.
| Compound Name | Inhibitory Concentration (μM) |
|---|---|
| Hispidulin | 0.49 ± 0.1 |
| Crisimaritin | 0.43 ± 0.07 |
| Luteolin | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| Apigenin | 0.14 ± 0.02 |
| Kaempferol | 0.49 ± 0.1 |
| Flavone | 0.17 ± 0.01 |
| Hesperetin | 0.28 ± 0.07 |
| Naringenin | 2.5 ± 0.3 |
| Genistein | 0.48 ± 0.04 |
| Cyanidin | 1.41 ± 0.25 |
| Cyanidin-3-glucoside | 0.42 ± 0.09 |
| Malvidin | 1.41 ± 0.44 |
| Resveratrol | 0.0006 ± 0.0004 |
Figure 2Activity atlas model generated based on the alignment of 13 polyphenols to generated field template which provides: activity cliff summary (a); average of actives (b); and regions explored (c). Forge visualization is used to understand the activity atlas and structure–activity relationship (SAR) of different natural compounds already proven to inhibit dipeptidyl peptidase-4 activity.
Figure 3The three-dimensional view, representing the binding pose view of chrysin: at the active site of the DPP-4 enzyme (a); and (b) a two-dimensional representation of interacting residues from the DPP-4 enzyme, involved at binding pose of chrysin.
Figure 4Chrysin bioactive conformation predicted using field template and fields predicted using activity atlas model. Field of chrysin is compared with resveratrol, sitagliptin, flavone, and luteolin.
Figure 5Different concentrations of chrysin and their relative percent of inhibition of DPP-4 enzyme activity. Data are represented as mean ± standard error.
Figure 6Metabolic transformation of natural compound chrysin.