Literature DB >> 29881608

Increased detection of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal dysplasia with adjunctive use of wide-area transepithelial sample with three-dimensional computer-assisted analysis (WATS).

Seth A Gross1, Michael S Smith2, Vivek Kaul3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal dysplasia (ED) are frequently missed during screening and surveillance esophagoscopy because of sampling error associated with four-quadrant random forceps biopsy (FB). AIM: The aim of this article is to determine if wide-area transepithelial sampling with three-dimensional computer-assisted analysis (WATS) used adjunctively with FB can increase the detection of BE and ED.
METHODS: In this multicenter prospective trial, patients screened for suspected BE and those with known BE undergoing surveillance were enrolled. Patients at 25 community-based practices underwent WATS adjunctively to targeted FB and random four-quadrant FB.
RESULTS: Of 4203 patients, 594 were diagnosed with BE by FB alone, and 493 additional cases were detected by adding WATS, increasing the overall detection of BE by 83% (493/594, 95% CI 74%-93%). Low-grade dysplasia (LGD) was diagnosed in 26 patients by FB alone, and 23 additional cases were detected by adding WATS, increasing the detection of LGD by 88.5% (23/26, 95% CI 48%-160%).
CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive use of WATS to FB significantly improves the detection of both BE and ED. Sampling error, an inherent limitation associated with screening and surveillance, can be improved with WATS allowing better informed decisions to be made about the management and subsequent treatment of these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett’s esophagus; WATS; esophageal dysplasia; increased yield

Year:  2017        PMID: 29881608      PMCID: PMC5987273          DOI: 10.1177/2050640617746298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  23 in total

1.  Detection of intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus: an observational comparator study suggests the need for a minimum of eight biopsies.

Authors:  Rebecca Harrison; Ian Perry; William Haddadin; Stuart McDonald; Richard Bryan; Keith Abrams; Richard Sampliner; Nicholas J Talley; Paul Moayyedi; Janusz A Jankowski
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Prevalence of adenocarcinoma at esophagectomy for Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia.

Authors:  John Y Nasr; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-03

3.  Computer-assisted analysis of abrasive transepithelial brush biopsies increases the effectiveness of esophageal screening: a multicenter prospective clinical trial by the EndoCDx Collaborative Group.

Authors:  J F Johanson; J Frakes; D Eisen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Risk factors for Barrett's esophagus compared between African Americans and non-Hispanic Whites.

Authors:  Theresa H Nguyen; Aaron P Thrift; David Ramsey; Linda Green; Yasser H Shaib; David Y Graham; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett's esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria.

Authors:  Prateek Sharma; John Dent; David Armstrong; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Liebwin Gossner; Yoshio Hoshihara; Janusz A Jankowski; Ola Junghard; Lars Lundell; Guido N J Tytgat; Michael Vieth
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Frederik Hvid-Jensen; Lars Pedersen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Peter Funch-Jensen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Surveillance and survival in Barrett's adenocarcinomas: a population-based study.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Theodore R Levin; Laurel A Habel; Noel S Weiss; Patricia A Buffler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to rise: analysis of period and birth cohort effects on recent trends.

Authors:  A P Thrift; D C Whiteman
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Review article: emerging techniques for screening and surveillance in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  P Sharma
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Age at onset of GERD symptoms predicts risk of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Aaron P Thrift; Jennifer R Kramer; Zeeshan Qureshi; Peter A Richardson; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of Dysplasia in Barrett Esophagus.

Authors:  Seth A Gross; Joseph Kingsbery; Janice Jang; Michelle Lee; Abraham Khan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2018-04

Review 2.  Wide-area transepithelial sampling for dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Chamil Codipilly; Apoorva Krishna Chandar; Kenneth K Wang; David A Katzka; John R Goldblum; Prashanthi N Thota; Gary W Falk; Amitabh Chak; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  High rate of missed Barrett's esophagus when screening with forceps biopsies.

Authors:  Mendel E Singer; Robert D Odze
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  What is the optimal surveillance strategy for non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus?

Authors:  Ying Gibbens; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-25

5.  WATS3D versus forceps biopsy in screening for Barrett's esophagus: experience in community endoscopy centers.

Authors:  Yasmine Hussein Agha; Sachin Srinivasan; Jeffrey Hyder; Chelsea Wuthnow; Ali Taleb; Nathan Tofteland; William Kilgore; William Salyers
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-07

Review 6.  Surveillance of Barrett's esophagus using wide-area transepithelial sampling: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bashar Qumseya; Aymen Bukannan; Robyn Rosasco; Xiuli Liu; Amira Qumseya
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-04-14

7.  Wide Area Transepithelial Sampling with Computer-Assisted Analysis (WATS3D) Is Cost-Effective in Barrett's Esophagus Screening.

Authors:  Mendel E Singer; Michael S Smith
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Wide-area transepithelial sampling in adjunct to forceps biopsy increases the absolute detection rates of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal dysplasia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar; Prateek Harne; Venkata Suresh Patthipati; Abinash Subedi; Umair Masood; Anuj Sharma; Faith Goyal; Nancy Aggarwal; Bishnu Sapkota
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09

9.  Adjunctive Yield of Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling for Dysplasia Detection After Advanced Imaging and Random Biopsies in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Kara L Raphael; Molly Stewart; Divyesh V Sejpal; Mary Cheung; Matthew J Whitson; Dennis Han; Petros C Benias; Calvin Lee; Larry S Miller; Arvind J Trindade
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 10.  Role of Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling With 3D Computer-Assisted Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Robert D Odze; John Goldblum; Vivek Kaul
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.