Literature DB >> 34543648

Wide-area transepithelial sampling for dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

D Chamil Codipilly1, Apoorva Krishna Chandar2, Kenneth K Wang1, David A Katzka1, John R Goldblum3, Prashanthi N Thota4, Gary W Falk5, Amitabh Chak6, Prasad G Iyer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Seattle protocol forceps biopsy sampling (FB) is currently recommended for surveillance in Barrett's esophagus (BE) but limited by sampling error and lack of compliance. Wide-area transepithelial sampling with 3-dimensional analysis (WATS3D; CDx Diagnostics, Suffern, NY, USA) is reported to increase BE dysplasia detection. We assessed the incremental yield and clinical significance of WATS3D for dysplasia detection over FB in a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: We queried major scientific databases for studies using WATS3D and FB from 2000 to 2020. The primary outcome was the incremental yield of WATS3D-detected dysplasia (defined as a composite of indefinite for dysplasia, low- and high-grade dysplasia [HGD] and esophageal adenocarcinoma [EAC]) over FB. Secondary outcomes were incremental yields of HGD/EAC and rate of reconfirmation of WATS3D dysplasia on subsequent FB.
RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 7 eligible studies demonstrated that FB diagnosed dysplasia in 15.9% of cases, whereas the incremental yield with WATS3D was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, 3.9%-11.5%; I2= 92.1%). Meta-analysis of 6 studies demonstrated that FB diagnosed HGD/EAC in 2.3% of patients, whereas the incremental yield with WATS3D was 2.1% (95% confidence interval, .4%-5.3%; I2= 92.7%). Notably, WATS3D was negative in 62.5% of cases where FB identified dysplasia. Two studies reported reconfirmation of WATS3D dysplasia with FB histology in only 20 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: WATS3D increases dysplasia detection; however, the clinical significance of this increased dysplasia detection remains uncertain. Data from endoscopic follow-up to ascertain FB histology in patients with dysplasia based solely on WATS3D are needed to determine the optimal clinical application and significance of WATS3D-only dysplasia.
Copyright © 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34543648      PMCID: PMC8671247          DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  41 in total

1.  Clinical and histologic determinants of mortality for patients with Barrett's esophagus-related T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Cadman L Leggett; Jason T Lewis; Tsung Teh Wu; Cathy D Schleck; Alan R Zinsmeister; Kelly T Dunagan; Lori S Lutzke; Kenneth K Wang; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Risk of progression in Barrett's esophagus indefinite for dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Babu P Mohan; Mahendran Jayaraj; Kenneth K Wang; David A Katzka; Andrew Ross; Douglas G Adler; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Inter-Observer Agreement among Pathologists Using Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling With Computer-Assisted Analysis in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Prashanth R Vennalaganti; Vijay Naag Kanakadandi; Seth A Gross; Sravanthi Parasa; Kenneth K Wang; Neil Gupta; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.

Authors:  Bas Weusten; Raf Bisschops; Emanuel Coron; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; José-Miguel Esteban; Cesare Hassan; Oliver Pech; Alessandro Repici; Jacques Bergman; Massimiliano di Pietro
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 5.  Barrett's esophagus and Barrett's-related dysplasia.

Authors:  John R Goldblum
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 6.  The Effect of Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Don Chamil Codipilly; Apoorva Krishna Chandar; Siddharth Singh; Sachin Wani; Nicholas J Shaheen; John M Inadomi; Amitabh Chak; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Gary W Falk; Prasad G Iyer; Lauren B Gerson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Lower Annual Rate of Progression of Short-Segment vs Long-Segment Barrett's Esophagus to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nour Hamade; Sreekar Vennelaganti; Sravanthi Parasa; Prashanth Vennalaganti; Srinivas Gaddam; Manon C W Spaander; Sophie H van Olphen; Prashanthi N Thota; Kevin F Kennedy; Marco J Bruno; John J Vargo; Sharad Mathur; Brooks D Cash; Richard Sampliner; Neil Gupta; Gary W Falk; Ajay Bansal; Patrick E Young; David A Lieberman; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Epidemiology and Outcomes of Young-Onset Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis from a Population-Based Database.

Authors:  David A Katzka; Prasad G Iyer; Don C Codipilly; Tarek Sawas; Lovekirat Dhaliwal; Michele L Johnson; Ramona Lansing; Kenneth K Wang; Cadman L Leggett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.090

10.  Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and prior diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus: a population-based study.

Authors:  Shivaram K Bhat; Damian T McManus; Helen G Coleman; Brian T Johnston; Christopher R Cardwell; Una McMenamin; Finian Bannon; Blanaid Hicks; Grace Kennedy; Anna T Gavin; Liam J Murray
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in Development and Use of Biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Nicola F Frei; Matthew D Stachler
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-02-02

2.  Retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study of detection of recurrent Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia in post-ablation patients with adjunctive use of wide-area transepithelial sample (WATS-3D).

Authors:  Hala Fatima; Maryiam Wajid; Nour Hamade; Yan Han; William Kessler; John Dewitt; Douglas Rex; Thomas Imperiale
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-07

Review 3.  Management of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus: When to survey? When to ablate?

Authors:  Max M Puthenpura; Krishna O Sanaka; Yi Qin; Prashanthi N Thota
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.091

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.