Literature DB >> 298812

Foveal cone electroretinograms in strabismic amblyopia: comparison with juvenile macular degeneration, macular scars, and optic atrophy.

S G Jacobson, M A Sandberg, M H Effron, E L Berson.   

Abstract

A hand-held stimulator-ophthalmoscope was used to elicit foveal cone electroretinograms (ERGs) from fifteen patients with strabismic amblyopia. The ERGs were in response to a 4 degrees stimulus visualized on the fundus and centred on the fovea throughout testing. Foveal cone ERGs from amblyopic eyes were normal in amplitude and normal in b-wave implicit time. Interocular differences in ERGs in patients with amblyopia were no greater than those in normal subjects. Patients with comparable visual acuity loss due to macular scars or juvenile hereditary macular degeneration had abnormal foveal cone ERGs, while patients with optic atrophy had normal responses. These findings support the idea that the defect in strabismic amblyopia does not involve a functional abnormality in the fovea distal to the ganglion cell layer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 298812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K        ISSN: 0078-5334


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the LKC stimulator for focal ERG testing.

Authors:  J S Lyons; D J Sapper
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Pupillary responses in amblyopia.

Authors:  A Y Firth
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Decreased nasal-temporal asymmetry of the second-order kernel response of multifocal electroretinograms in eyes with normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Eijiro Asano; Kiyofumi Mochizuki; Akira Sawada; Ei-Ichiro Nagasaka; Yuji Kondo; Tetsuya Yamamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Electrophysiologic testing and its specific application in unsedated children.

Authors:  T D France
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1984

Review 5.  The clinical utility of the foveal electroretinogram: a review.

Authors:  W R Biersdorf
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Pattern and Ganzfeld electroretinograms in macular disease.

Authors:  G B Arden; R M Carter; A Macfarlan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Macular electroretinograms and contrast sensitivity as sensitive detectors of early maculopathy.

Authors:  F A Billson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-11-15       Impact factor: 2.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.