Literature DB >> 11720257

Evaluation of the LKC stimulator for focal ERG testing.

J S Lyons1, D J Sapper.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated the ability of focal ERGs to diagnose abnormally functioning maculae in the absence of funduscopic and angiographic signs, as well as to confirm diagnoses of clinically suspected macular disease. We present normative data on the second commercially available focal ERG stimulator (FCS-500, LKC Technologies), which may be added to the standard full field ERG systems currently used in many laboratories. The stimulator uses a monocular indirect ophthalmoscope to present a 5 degrees white stimulus flickering at 31.25 Hz in a 20 degrees background field. We have established a range of normal amplitudes (747-3000 nV) and implicit times (30.5-37.5 ms) for the instrument based on tests of 45 eyes of 45 normal patients. To confirm the validity of this test for diagnosis of ocular dysfunction we compared these normals to 46 eyes of 46 patients with macular disease and decreased acuity, and to 49 eyes of 49 patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Using Focal ERG amplitude alone, we found overall accuracy of 85% in diagnosing macular disease associated with decreased acuity. These findings confirm the validity and efficacy of the system we have evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11720257     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012421111342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  9 in total

1.  Foveal cone electroretinograms in patients with central visual loss of unexplained etiology.

Authors:  G P Matthews; M A Sandberg; E L Berson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-11

2.  Automated estimation of implicit time and amplitude from the flicker electroretinogram.

Authors:  M L Severns; M A Johnson; S A Merritt
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Normal change in the foveal cone ERG with increasing duration of light exposure.

Authors:  A Weiner; M A Sandberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Standard for clinical electroretinography (1994 update).

Authors:  M F Marmor; E Zrenner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 5.  The clinical utility of the foveal electroretinogram: a review.

Authors:  W R Biersdorf
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Foveal cone electroretinograms in strabismic amblyopia: comparison with juvenile macular degeneration, macular scars, and optic atrophy.

Authors:  S G Jacobson; M A Sandberg; M H Effron; E L Berson
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1979

7.  A comparison of visual function tests in eyes with maculopathy.

Authors:  G E Fish; D G Birch; D G Fuller; R Straach
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Hereditary macular dystrophy without visible fundus abnormality.

Authors:  Y Miyake; K Ichikawa; Y Shiose; Y Kawase
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-09-15       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  The focal electroretinogram in the clinical assessment of macular disease.

Authors:  G E Fish; D G Birch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 12.079

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.